scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Global prevalence of anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-regression

TLDR
Anxiety disorders are common and the substantive and methodological factors identified here explain much of the variability in prevalence estimates, and specific attention should be paid to cultural differences in responses to survey instruments for anxiety disorders.
Abstract
BackgroundThe literature describing the global prevalence of anxiety disorders is highly variable. A systematic review and meta-regression were undertaken to estimate the prevalence of anxiety disorders and to identify factors that may influence these estimates. The findings will inform the new Global Burden of Disease study.MethodA systematic review identified prevalence studies of anxiety disorders published between 1980 and 2009. Electronic databases, reference lists, review articles and monographs were searched and experts then contacted to identify missing studies. Substantive and methodological factors associated with inter-study variability were identified through meta-regression analyses and the global prevalence of anxiety disorders was calculated adjusting for study methodology.ResultsThe prevalence of anxiety disorders was obtained from 87 studies across 44 countries. Estimates of current prevalence ranged between 0.9% and 28.3% and past-year prevalence between 2.4% and 29.8%. Substantive factors including gender, age, culture, conflict and economic status, and urbanicity accounted for the greatest proportion of variability. Methodological factors in the final multivariate model (prevalence period, number of disorders and diagnostic instrument) explained an additional 13% of variance between studies. The global current prevalence of anxiety disorders adjusted for methodological differences was 7.3% (4.8–10.9%) and ranged from 5.3% (3.5–8.1%) in African cultures to 10.4% (7.0–15.5%) in Euro/Anglo cultures.ConclusionsAnxiety disorders are common and the substantive and methodological factors identified here explain much of the variability in prevalence estimates. Specific attention should be paid to cultural differences in responses to survey instruments for anxiety disorders.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The global prevalence of common mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis 1980–2013

TL;DR: Despite a substantial degree of inter-survey heterogeneity in the meta-analysis, the findings confirm that common mental disorders are highly prevalent globally, affecting people across all regions of the world.
Journal ArticleDOI

The State of US Health, 1990-2016: Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Among US States

Ali H. Mokdad, +143 more
- 10 Apr 2018 - 
TL;DR: There are wide differences in the burden of disease at the state level and specific diseases and risk factors, such as drug use disorders, high BMI, poor diet, high fasting plasma glucose level, and alcohol use disorders are increasing and warrant increased attention.
Journal ArticleDOI

Scaling-up treatment of depression and anxiety: a global return on investment analysis.

TL;DR: Return on investment analysis of the kind reported here can contribute strongly to a balanced investment case for enhanced action to address the large and growing burden of common mental disorders worldwide.
Journal ArticleDOI

A systematic review and meta-regression of the prevalence and incidence of perinatal depression

TL;DR: Perinatal depression appears to impose a higher burden on women in low- and middle-income countries and studies in low income countries were especially scarce in this review, demonstrating a need for more epidemiological research in those regions.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

TL;DR: Moher et al. as mentioned in this paper introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which is used in this paper.
Journal Article

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.

TL;DR: The QUOROM Statement (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analyses) as mentioned in this paper was developed to address the suboptimal reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Book

Applied Logistic Regression

TL;DR: Hosmer and Lemeshow as discussed by the authors provide an accessible introduction to the logistic regression model while incorporating advances of the last decade, including a variety of software packages for the analysis of data sets.
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

TL;DR: A structured summary is provided including, as applicable, background, objectives, data sources, study eligibility criteria, participants, interventions, study appraisal and synthesis methods, results, limitations, conclusions and implications of key findings.
Journal ArticleDOI

Applied Logistic Regression.

TL;DR: Applied Logistic Regression, Third Edition provides an easily accessible introduction to the logistic regression model and highlights the power of this model by examining the relationship between a dichotomous outcome and a set of covariables.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (3)
How does the prevalence of generalized anxiety disorder vary across different cultures and demographics?

The paper does not specifically mention the prevalence of generalized anxiety disorder across different cultures and demographics.

What is the prevelence of anxiety in global?

The global prevalence of anxiety disorders is estimated to be 7.3%, meaning that approximately one in 14 people worldwide has an anxiety disorder at any given time.

What is the prevalence of anxiety in the world?

The prevalence of anxiety disorders in the world is 7.3%, suggesting that one in 14 people globally has an anxiety disorder at any given time.