scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Group Identity and Social Preferences

Yan Chen, +1 more
- 01 Feb 2009 - 
- Vol. 99, Iss: 1, pp 431-457
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
This paper found that participants are significantly more likely to choose social welfare-maximizing actions when matched with an ingroup member when compared to when they are matched with a non-group identity.
Abstract
We present a laboratory experiment that measures the effects of induced group identity on social preferences. We find that when participants are matched with an ingroup member, they show a 47 percent increase in charity concerns and a 93 percent decrease in envy. Likewise, participants are 19 percent more likely to reward an ingroup match for good behavior, but 13 percent less likely to punish an ingroup match for misbehavior. Furthermore, participants are significantly more likely to choose social-welfare-maximizing actions when matched with an ingroup member. All results are consistent with the hypothesis that participants are more altruistic toward an ingroup match. (

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Posted Content

On Peer Effects: Contagion of Pro- and Anti-Social Behavior and the Role of Social Cohesion

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors use a novel experimental approach that enables them to analyze the contagion of behavior under varied levels of social distance to peers and differences in contagions of pro- and anti-social behavior.

On the Eects of Group Identity in Strategic Environments

TL;DR: The authors examined the differences in behavior between subjects interacting with a member of either the same or different identity group in both a centipede game and a series of stag hunt games, and concluded that group identity not only affects a player's social preferences, but also affects the decision-making process, independent of changes in the utility function.
Journal ArticleDOI

Modelling behaviour in intergroup conflicts: a review of microeconomic approaches

TL;DR: The authors provide an overview of the pertinent literatures in economics, highlights instructive examples of central model types and points out several ways forward. But their focus is on intergroup conflict across taxa.
Journal ArticleDOI

Strategic Discrimination in Hierarchies

TL;DR: The authors explore strategic discrimination in principal-agent relationships, which arises from mutually reinforcing expectations of identity-contingent choices, in a laboratory setting, and show that strategic discrimination can be achieved by mutually reinforcing expectation of identity contingent decisions.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing

TL;DR: In this paper, a different approach to problems of multiple significance testing is presented, which calls for controlling the expected proportion of falsely rejected hypotheses -the false discovery rate, which is equivalent to the FWER when all hypotheses are true but is smaller otherwise.
Book ChapterDOI

The social identity theory of intergroup behavior

TL;DR: A theory of intergroup conflict and some preliminary data relating to the theory is presented in this article. But the analysis is limited to the case where the salient dimensions of the intergroup differentiation are those involving scarce resources.
Journal ArticleDOI

z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments

TL;DR: Z-Tree as mentioned in this paper is a toolbox for ready-made economic experiments, which allows programming almost any kind of experiments in a short time and is stable and easy to use.
Journal ArticleDOI

A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation

TL;DR: This paper showed that if some people care about equity, the puzzles can be resolved and that the economic environment determines whether the fair types or the selesh types dominate equilibrium behavior in cooperative games.
Related Papers (5)