scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Guidance on tiered risk assessment for plant protection products for aquatic organisms in edge-of-field surface waters

TLDR
The Guidance of the PPR Panel was tasked to revise the Guidance Document on Aquatic Ecotoxicology and provides the scientific background for the risk assessment to aquatic organisms in edge-of-field surface waters and is structured to give detailed guidance on all assessment steps.
Abstract
EFSA‘s Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR) was tasked to revise the Guidance Document (GD) on Aquatic Ecotoxicology under Council Directive 91/414/EEC (SANCO/3268/2001 rev.4 (final), 17 October 2002). This Guidance of the PPR Panel is the first of three requested deliverables within this mandate. It has its focus on tiered acute and chronic effect assessment schemes with detailed guidance on tier 1 and higher tier effect assessments for aquatic organisms in edge-of-field surface waters and on proposals regarding how to link effects to exposure estimates. The exposure assessment methodology was not reviewed and it is assumed that the current FOCUS surface water exposure assessment methodology will continue to be used for exposure assessment at EU level. The current GD is intended to be used for authorisation of active substances at EU level as well as for plant protection products at Member State level. The effect assessment schemes in this GD allow for the derivation of regulatory acceptable concentrations (RACs) on the basis of two options: (1) the ecological threshold option (ETO), accepting negligible population effects only, and (2) the ecological recovery option (ERO), accepting some population-level effects if ecological recovery takes place within an acceptable time period. In the tiered effect assessment schemes, in principle, all tiers (1, 2 and 3) are able to address the ETO, while the model ecosystem approach (tier 3), under certain conditions, is able to also address the ERO. The GD provides the scientific background for the risk assessment to aquatic organisms in edge-of-field surface waters and is structured to give detailed guidance on all assessment steps. An executive summary joining all parts of the guidance and decision schemes in a concise way is provided and is intended to help applicants and regulatory authorities in day-to-day use. © European Food Safety Authority, 2013

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Neonicotinoid contamination of global surface waters and associated risk to aquatic invertebrates: A review

TL;DR: It appears that environmentally relevant concentrations of neonicotinoids in surface waters worldwide are well within the range where both short- and long-term impacts on aquatic invertebrate species are possible over broad spatial scales.
Journal ArticleDOI

How a Complete Pesticide Screening Changes the Assessment of Surface Water Quality

TL;DR: An extensive analytical screening was carried out using liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry, covering 86% of all polar organic pesticides sold in Switzerland and applied to agricultural or urban land, plus 134 transformation products; each of which could be quantified in the low ng/L range.
Journal ArticleDOI

Guidance for the identification of endocrine disruptors in the context of Regulations (EU) No 528/2012 and (EC) No 1107/2009

TL;DR: This Guidance describes how to perform hazard identification for endocrine‐disrupting properties by following the scientific criteria which are outlined in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/2100 and Commission Regulation 2018/605 for biocidal products and plant protection products, respectively.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.

TL;DR: A new reproducibility index is developed and studied that is simple to use and possesses desirable properties and the statistical properties of this estimate can be satisfactorily evaluated using an inverse hyperbolic tangent transformation.
Journal ArticleDOI

A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science

TL;DR: A vulnerability framework for the assessment of coupled human–environment systems is presented and it is shown that vulnerability is registered not by exposure to hazards alone but also resides in the sensitivity and resilience of the system experiencing such hazards.
Journal ArticleDOI

Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits.

TL;DR: It is asserted that community ecology should return to an emphasis on four themes that are tied together by a two-step process: how the fundamental niche is governed by functional traits within the context of abiotic environmental gradients; and how the interaction between traits and fundamental niches maps onto the realized niche in the context a biotic interaction milieu.
Related Papers (5)