Mechanical pretreatments of lignocellulosic biomass: towards facile and environmentally sound technologies for biofuels production
read more
Citations
Nanocellulose: Extraction and application
New opportunities for agricultural digestate valorization: current situation and perspectives
Lignocellulosic Biomass: Understanding Recalcitrance and Predicting Hydrolysis.
Pretreatment methods of lignocellulosic biomass for anaerobic digestion
Insight into progress in pre-treatment of lignocellulosic biomass
References
Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass.
Energy production from biomass (Part 1): Overview of biomass.
Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes to improve ethanol and biogas production: a review.
Note on a Method of Determining the Distribution of Pore Sizes in a Porous Material
Fundamental factors affecting biomass enzymatic reactivity.
Related Papers (5)
Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review.
Frequently Asked Questions (11)
Q2. What are the future works in "Mechanical pretreatments of lignocellulosic biomass: towards facile and environmentally sound technologies for biofuels production" ?
Sh er br oo ke o n 09 /1 0/ 20 14 0 7: 49 :3 9. 5. Conclusion and perspectives for the future: environmental drypretreatment lignocellulosic biorefineries In this regard, dry chemical/ physicochemical and biological “ solid state ” pretreatments combined with dry fractionation steps can be key for advanced pretreatment processes in the future, of direct use in downstream processing in the absence of any solvents/conditioning steps or even separation. The authors believe these technologies can signicantly contribute to a more sustainable biomass processing in the future, being part of industrial ventures in their aim to develop multidisciplinary processes equally efficient, cost competitive and with improved environmental footprint to those derived from petrol-based resources that they have relied upon the past 50+ years. The complexity of pretreatment steps for an eventual energetic valorization of the biomass was illustrated with a number of examples that provides relevant alternatives to traditional ( physic ) chemical pretreatments with generally promising ( and even improved ) results.
Q3. What are the factors that can inuence sugar recovery from biomass?
the extruder screw speed, barrel temperature, and feedstock moisture content are important factors that can inuence sugar recovery from biomass.
Q4. What is the main advantage of a uidized bed as superne grinder?
The uidized bed as superne grinder has been widely used in various industrial elds for its excellent ability to improve the surface area and enhance the bioavailability of the materials through micronizations, without sacricing the natural physical–chemical proprieties of the materials.
Q5. How can the authors determine the specic surface area of a material?
In the case of materials with macropores and mesopores (greater than 3 nm), the determination of the specic surface area, as well as pore size distribution must be conducted by analyzing the curves of mercury porosimetry.
Q6. What is the effect of size reduction on the rate of hydrolysis of cellulose?
The reduction of particle size could enhance the affinity between cellulose polymers and enzymes and thus increase the rate of hydrolysis.
Q7. How much hydrolysis was achieved with a minimum enzyme loading?
when lignocellulosic substrates were employed, up to 100% hydrolysis was achieved with a minimum enzyme loading (10 lter paper units per g of cellulose) at lower substrate concentrations and with a greater number of reaction beads during milling.
Q8. What variables had a signicant effect on sugar recovery?
Statistical analyses revealed that among the independent variables considered, temperature, screw speed, and moisture content had signicant effect on sugar recoveries.
Q9. How much energy is required to grind non-torreed pine chips?
Grindability of torreed pine chips was substantially improved aer torrefaction at 275 C and 300 C as well as the specic energies required for grinding (24–52 kW h t 1), while the energy consumption to grind non-torreed spruce and beech chips was as high as 750 kW h t 1 and 850 kW h t 1, respectively.
Q10. How does SSA of miscanthus and switchgrass increase with particle size?
As seen in Fig. 4, SSA of treated miscanthus and switchgrass is highly sensitive to particle size since it increases linearly with increasing particle size.
Q11. How did the authors achieve the conditions for the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose?
Optimum conditions for the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose (86%) were achieved using peracetic acid 1 g g 1 followed by ball milling for 6 days.