Power reduction by varying sampling rate
read more
Citations
A survey on wireless body area networks
E-MiLi: Energy-Minimizing Idle Listening in Wireless Networks
E-MiLi: energy-minimizing idle listening in wireless networks
Event-Driven Data Acquisition and Digital Signal Processing—A Tutorial
A Survey of Energy Efficient Wireless Transmission and Modeling in Mobile Cloud Computing
References
Communication in the presence of noise
Alpha-power law MOSFET model and its applications to CMOS inverter delay and other formulas
Real-time dynamic voltage scaling for low-power embedded operating systems
CMOS Digital Integrated Circuits Analysis & Design
Low Power Design Methodologies
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (13)
Q2. What is the effect of the variable sampling rate technique?
As the amount of computation per frame decreases the technique becomes less effective due to the overhead of determining the frequency content of a frame.
Q3. What is the typical sampling rate for human hearing?
Since human hearing is generally considered to cover a range of 20 Hz to 20 KHz, typical audio sampling rates are 44.1 KHz or 48 KHz.
Q4. What is the way to increase the sampling rate of a hearing aid?
Whenever a high frequency input is detected, the hearing aid can increase its sampling rate and processing speed to process the input at a rate high enough to preserve signal fidelity.
Q5. What are the common uses of audio compression algorithms?
Lossy audio compression algorithms [12, 23] commonly use psychoacoustic principles to reduce the amount of data in a stored or transmitted audio stream.
Q6. How much power is required to process the signal?
The variable sampling rate technique reduces power required to as little as 40 % of the power required for the static sampling rate, depending on the amount of processing per frame.
Q7. How many FIR filters are used to determine the frequency of the hearing aid?
Around 14 FIR filters, constant rate hearing aid consumed approximately 2.5 times more power than the variable rate hearing aid because the constant rate hearing aid is forced to run at a frequency that requires 1.6 V.
Q8. What is the way to schedule DVS tasks?
Other DVS algorithms could schedule variable sampling rate signal processing tasks with other tasks in a system with other real-time tasks.
Q9. How long can a PLL lock to a new frequency?
Calculations based on specifications from TI and experiments with frequency scaling have shown that locking to a new frequency can take from 20 µs to 80 µs.
Q10. What was used to determine the maximum frequency content in the input signal?
The FFT used to determine the maximum frequency content in the input signal was taken from the TI TMS320C55x DSPlib library [22].
Q11. How many samples are taken per 20 ms frame?
Thus the system could slow down the CPU in proportion to the number of samples, so that the filter finishes computing the filtered frame as close to 20 ms as possible.
Q12. What is the difference between the variable rate hearing aid and the constant rate hearing aid?
At low loads the standard hearing aid uses less power than the variable rate hearing aid because both the constant rate and the variable rate hearing aid can run at a frequency low enough that Vdd is always 1.1 V.
Q13. What is the difference between the variable and static sampling rate hearing aids?
The variable sampling rate system would likely also do better if more voltage levels wereavailable, since the largest advantage is seen when it is able to switch to a lower voltage than the static sampling rate system much of the time.