scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Scaling properties of convection-driven dynamos in rotating spherical shells and application to planetary magnetic fields

TLDR
In this paper, an extensive set of dynamo models in rotating spherical shells, varying all relevant control parameters by at least two orders of magnitude, were studied and their scaling laws were established.
Abstract
SUMMARY We study numerically an extensive set of dynamo models in rotating spherical shells, varying all relevant control parameters by at least two orders of magnitude. Convection is driven by a fixed temperature contrast between rigid boundaries. There are two distinct classes of solutions with strong and weak dipole contributions to the magnetic field, respectively. Non-dipolar dynamos are found when inertia plays a significant role in the force balance. In the dipolar regime the critical magnetic Reynolds number for self-sustained dynamos is of order 50, independent of the magnetic Prandtl number Pm. However, dynamos at low Pm exist only at sufficiently low Ekman number E. For dynamos in the dipolar regime we attempt to establish scaling laws that fit our numerical results. Assuming that diffusive effects do not play a primary role, we introduce non-dimensional parameters that are independent of any diffusivity. These are a modified Rayleigh number based on heat (or buoyancy) flux Ra ∗ , the Rossby number Ro measuring the flow velocity, the Lorentz number Lo measuring magnetic field strength, and a modified Nusselt number Nu ∗ for the advected heat flow. To first approximation, all our dynamo results can be collapsed into simple power-law dependencies on the modified Rayleigh number, with approximate exponents of 2/5, 1/2 and 1/3 for the Rossby number, modified Nusselt number and Lorentz number, respectively. Residual dependencies on the parameters related to diffusion (E, Pm, Prandtl number Pr) are weak. Our scaling laws are in agreement with the assumption that the magnetic field strength is controlled by the available power and not necessarily by a force balance. The Elsasser number � , which is the conventional measure for the ratio of Lorentz force to Coriolis force, is found to vary widely. We try to assess the relative importance of the various forces by studying sources and sinks of enstrophy (squared vorticity). In general Coriolis and buoyancy forces are of the same order, inertia and viscous forces make smaller and variable contributions, and the Lorentz force is highly variable. Ignoring a possible weak dependence on the Prandtl numbers or the Ekman number, a surprising prediction is that the magnetic field strength is independent both of conductivity and of rotation rate and is basically controlled by the buoyancy flux. Estimating the buoyancy flux in the Earth’s core using our Rossby number scaling and a typical velocity inferred from geomagnetic secular variations, we predict a small growth rate and old age of the inner core and obtain a reasonable magnetic field strength of order 1 mT inside the core. From the observed heat flow in Jupiter, we predict an internal field of 8 mT, in agreement with Jupiter’s external field being 10 times stronger than that of the Earth.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Simulations of Dynamo Action in Fully Convective Stars

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present three-dimensional nonlinear magnetohydrodynamic simulations of the interiors of fully convective M dwarfs using the Anelastic Spherical Harmonic code, with the spherical computational domain extending from 0.08 to 0.96 times the overall stellar radius.
Journal ArticleDOI

Energy flux determines magnetic field strength of planets and stars

TL;DR: This work reports an extension of a scaling law derived from geodynamo models to rapidly rotating stars that have strong density stratification, and predicts that the field strengths of rapidly rotating brown dwarfs and massive extrasolar planets are high enough to make them observable.
Journal ArticleDOI

Planetary Magnetic Fields and Fluid Dynamos

TL;DR: A wide range of simulations with different convection models, varying boundary conditions, and parameter values have been performed over the past 10 years as discussed by the authors and the results of specific models relating to individual planets are reviewed.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A three-dimensional self-consistent computer simulation of a geomagnetic field reversal

TL;DR: In this article, a three-dimensional, self-consistent numerical model of the geodynamo is described, which maintains a magnetic field for over 40,000 years, including a successful reversal of the dipole moment.
Journal ArticleDOI

A three-dimensional convective dynamo solution with rotating and finitely conducting inner core and mantle

TL;DR: In this article, the authors presented the first 3D, time-dependent, self-consistent numerical solution of the magneto- hydrodynamic (MHD) equations that describe thermal convection and magnetic field generation in a rapidly rotating spherical fluid shell with a solid conducting inner core.
Journal ArticleDOI

The role of the Earth's mantle in controlling the frequency of geomagnetic reversals

TL;DR: In this article, a series of computer simulations of the Earth's dynamo illustrates how the thermal structure of the lowermost mantle might affect convection and magnetic field generation in the fluid core.
Journal ArticleDOI

An Earth-like numerical dynamo model

TL;DR: In this paper, a numerical investigation of the dynamo process in the Earth's core was conducted, and the authors obtained a solution that at leading order operates in an Earth-like dynamical regime.
Journal ArticleDOI

Numerical Simulations of Stellar Convective Dynamos. I. The Model and Method

TL;DR: In this paper, a numerical model used to simulate global convection and magnetic field generation in stars is described, where the velocity, magnetic field, and thermodynamic perturbations are expanded in spherical harmonics to resolve their horizontal structure and in Chebyshev polynomials to resolve the radial structure.
Related Papers (5)