scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted Content

Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The findings suggest that the previously asserted direct effect of structural differentiation on ambidexterity operates through informal senior team and formal organizational integration mechanisms, and contributes to a greater clarity and better understanding of how organizations may effectively pursue exploration and exploitation simultaneously to achieve ambideXterity.
Abstract
textPrior studies have emphasized that structural attributes are crucial to simultaneously pursuing exploration and exploitation, yet our understanding of antecedents of ambidexterity is still limited. Structural differentiation can help ambidextrous organizations to maintain multiple inconsistent and conflicting demands; however, differentiated exploratory and exploitative activities need to mobilized, coordinated, integrated, and applied. Based on this idea, we delineate formal and informal senior team integration mechanisms (i.e. contingency rewards and social integration) and formal and informal organizational integration mechanisms (i.e. cross-functional interfaces and connectedness) and examine how they mediate the relationship between structural differentiation and ambidexterity. Overall, our findings suggest that the previously asserted direct effect of structural differentiation on ambidexterity operates through informal senior team (i.e. senior team social integration) and formal organizational (i.e. cross-functional interfaces) integration mechanisms. Through this richer explanation and empirical assessment, we contribute to a greater clarity and better understanding of how organizations may effectively pursue exploration and exploitation simultaneously to achieve ambidexterity.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors draw on a variety of cognate literatures to discuss the field-level structural characteristics and organizational attributes that shape institutional complexity and explore the repertoire of strategies and structures that organizations deploy to cope with multiple, competing demands.
Journal ArticleDOI

Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance

TL;DR: An overview of the seven articles included in this special issue is provided and several avenues for future research are suggested.
Posted Content

Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future

TL;DR: Organizational ambidexterity refers to the ability of an organization to both explore and exploit--to compete in mature technologies and markets where efficiency, control, and incremental improvement are prized and to also compete in new technologies as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Organizations

TL;DR: The exploration and exploitation framework has attracted substantial interest from scholars studying phenomena such as organizational learning, knowledge management, innovation, organizational design, and strategic alliances as discussed by the authors, and it has become an essential lens for interpreting various behaviors and outcomes within and across organizations.
Journal ArticleDOI

CROSSROADS---Microfoundations of Performance: Balancing Efficiency and Flexibility in Dynamic Environments

TL;DR: Overall, this work contributes a more accurate view of how leaders effectively balance between efficiency and flexibility by emphasizing heuristics-based “strategies of simple rules,” multiple environmental realities, and higher-order “expert” cognition.
References
More filters

The Simultaneous Pursuit of Exploitation and Exploration in a Small Owner-Managed Service Firm

Dawn Wade
TL;DR: The Simultaneous Pursuit of Exploitation and Exploration in a Small Owner-Managed Service Firm by Dawn Charisse Wade April 2017 Chair: Dr. Daniel Robey Major Academic Unit: J. Mack Robinson College of Business Small owner-managed service firms must have the ability to create thoughtful and intriguing ideas to satisfy the needs of their clients as discussed by the authors.

Practical Implications of the Ambidexterity Concepts

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors aim at bridging the rigor-relevance gap regarding the concept of ambidexterity by systematically reviewing findings from academic and practitioner literature in order to provide practical implications for managers to reconcile exploration and exploitation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Roles of Board of Directors in Organizational Ambidexterity

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine the interaction effect of these two distinct mechanisms on organizational ambidexterity in restaurant chain industry and propose that the adoption of the franchising system can work as a differentiation mechanism and board of directors can be an integration mechanism.
Book ChapterDOI

Study 3: Lessons from Tata: How Leadership Can Drive Disruptive Innovations

TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigate the role of a senior leader in commercializing disruptive innovations from within the boundaries of an established firm, focusing on the Tata Swach case study.
Journal ArticleDOI

Understanding managerial ambidexterity: a people–situation interaction approach

TL;DR: In this article, the antecedents to managerial ambidexterity from both situational and individual difference considerations were investigated, and it was found that learning goal orientation is positively related with managerial ambidesterity.
Related Papers (5)