Open AccessPosted Content
Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms
TLDR
The findings suggest that the previously asserted direct effect of structural differentiation on ambidexterity operates through informal senior team and formal organizational integration mechanisms, and contributes to a greater clarity and better understanding of how organizations may effectively pursue exploration and exploitation simultaneously to achieve ambideXterity.Abstract:
textPrior studies have emphasized that structural attributes are crucial to simultaneously pursuing exploration and exploitation, yet our understanding of antecedents of ambidexterity is still limited. Structural differentiation can help ambidextrous organizations to maintain multiple inconsistent and conflicting demands; however, differentiated exploratory and exploitative activities need to mobilized, coordinated, integrated, and applied. Based on this idea, we delineate formal and informal senior team integration mechanisms (i.e. contingency rewards and social integration) and formal and informal organizational integration mechanisms (i.e. cross-functional interfaces and connectedness) and examine how they mediate the relationship between structural differentiation and ambidexterity. Overall, our findings suggest that the previously asserted direct effect of structural differentiation on ambidexterity operates through informal senior team (i.e. senior team social integration) and formal organizational (i.e. cross-functional interfaces) integration mechanisms. Through this richer explanation and empirical assessment, we contribute to a greater clarity and better understanding of how organizations may effectively pursue exploration and exploitation simultaneously to achieve ambidexterity.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors draw on a variety of cognate literatures to discuss the field-level structural characteristics and organizational attributes that shape institutional complexity and explore the repertoire of strategies and structures that organizations deploy to cope with multiple, competing demands.
Journal ArticleDOI
Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance
TL;DR: An overview of the seven articles included in this special issue is provided and several avenues for future research are suggested.
Posted Content
Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future
TL;DR: Organizational ambidexterity refers to the ability of an organization to both explore and exploit--to compete in mature technologies and markets where efficiency, control, and incremental improvement are prized and to also compete in new technologies as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI
Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Organizations
TL;DR: The exploration and exploitation framework has attracted substantial interest from scholars studying phenomena such as organizational learning, knowledge management, innovation, organizational design, and strategic alliances as discussed by the authors, and it has become an essential lens for interpreting various behaviors and outcomes within and across organizations.
Journal ArticleDOI
CROSSROADS---Microfoundations of Performance: Balancing Efficiency and Flexibility in Dynamic Environments
TL;DR: Overall, this work contributes a more accurate view of how leaders effectively balance between efficiency and flexibility by emphasizing heuristics-based “strategies of simple rules,” multiple environmental realities, and higher-order “expert” cognition.
References
More filters
Platform owners and complementors: the emergence and evolution of platform firms and the performance implications for organizational learning, strategic alliance, and vertical integration behaviors of platform participants
TL;DR: In this article, the authors explore the emergence of platform firms and develop a theory and a process model showing how platform firms come into existence over four consecutive stages: (1) Inefficient Markets and Incumbents, (2) Entrepreneurial Motivation and Enabling Factors, (3) Efficiency-Enhancing Means, and (4) Platform Firms.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Impact of Knowledge Management and Dynamic Capacity on the Ambidextrous Innovation of Korean MNCs in the Chinese Market
Xin-Ran Yu,Tae-In Kim +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the relationship between knowledge management and ambidextrous innovation in Chinese subsidiaries of Korean MNCs and found that knowledge transfer and knowledge sharing have positive effects on dynamic capabilities and ambidesxterity innovation.
Proceedings Article
Exploring Sharing Economy Success: Resource-Based View and the Role of Resource Complementarity in Business Value Co-Creation
TL;DR: A holistic view is presented to illuminate relationships among resource complementarity, relational capabilities, subsequent performance and cooperation continuance intention based on the perspective of resource-based view to contribute nascent knowledge for sharing economy phenomenon and value co-creation with online marketing and information management disciplines scholarly.
Journal ArticleDOI
Making planning work: insights from business development
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigated the business development tasks and processes that span a growth opportunity's planning phase and its implementation phase and their unique performance implications, finding that business development increases firm performance and that the effectiveness of business planning depends on business development.