scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted Content

Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms

TLDR
The findings suggest that the previously asserted direct effect of structural differentiation on ambidexterity operates through informal senior team and formal organizational integration mechanisms, and contributes to a greater clarity and better understanding of how organizations may effectively pursue exploration and exploitation simultaneously to achieve ambideXterity.
Abstract
textPrior studies have emphasized that structural attributes are crucial to simultaneously pursuing exploration and exploitation, yet our understanding of antecedents of ambidexterity is still limited. Structural differentiation can help ambidextrous organizations to maintain multiple inconsistent and conflicting demands; however, differentiated exploratory and exploitative activities need to mobilized, coordinated, integrated, and applied. Based on this idea, we delineate formal and informal senior team integration mechanisms (i.e. contingency rewards and social integration) and formal and informal organizational integration mechanisms (i.e. cross-functional interfaces and connectedness) and examine how they mediate the relationship between structural differentiation and ambidexterity. Overall, our findings suggest that the previously asserted direct effect of structural differentiation on ambidexterity operates through informal senior team (i.e. senior team social integration) and formal organizational (i.e. cross-functional interfaces) integration mechanisms. Through this richer explanation and empirical assessment, we contribute to a greater clarity and better understanding of how organizations may effectively pursue exploration and exploitation simultaneously to achieve ambidexterity.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Configurations for Achieving Organizational Ambidexterity with Digitization

TL;DR: Organizational ambidexterity refers to the capability of businesses to balance the pursuit of radical innovation simultaneously with incremental innovation in order to balance radical innovation and incremental innovation.

Unlocking Business Model Innovation. A look through the keyhole at the inner workings of Business Model Innovation

Jaco Smit
TL;DR: In this paper, a keyhole look at the inner workings of business model innovation is presented, and it is shown that business model innovations are not conducive to being classified into any one framework or theory.
Journal ArticleDOI

HR practices for explorative and exploitative alliances in smart cities: Evidences from smart city managers’ perspective

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigate how multinational enterprises manage human resources (HR) in explorative and exploitative alliances in smart city projects (SCPs) and provide guidelines to MNEs in order to adapt HR practices and to rethink the role of HR within and across corporate boundaries in an emergent context of analysis.

Decision Making and Behavioral Strategy: The role of regulatory focus in corporate innovation processes

TL;DR: In this article, the authors make use of the behavioral strategy perspective in order to examine a number of constructs pertaining to innovation in corporate settings, including regulatory focus, organizational coordination, centralization, formalization, and connectedness.
Journal Article

Supply chain ambidexterity and manufacturing SME performance : the moderating roles of network capability and strategic information flow

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present an understanding of ambidextrous interorganizational collaboration and alliances in general and supply chain ambidexterity of manufacturing SMEs in particular.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.

TL;DR: This article seeks to make theorists and researchers aware of the importance of not using the terms moderator and mediator interchangeably by carefully elaborating the many ways in which moderators and mediators differ, and delineates the conceptual and strategic implications of making use of such distinctions with regard to a wide range of phenomena.
Book ChapterDOI

Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined the link between firm resources and sustained competitive advantage and analyzed the potential of several firm resources for generating sustained competitive advantages, including value, rareness, imitability, and substitutability.
Journal ArticleDOI

Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that the ability of a firm to recognize the value of new, external information, assimilate it, and apply it to commercial ends is critical to its innovative capabilities.
Journal ArticleDOI

Dynamic capabilities and strategic management

TL;DR: The dynamic capabilities framework as mentioned in this paper analyzes the sources and methods of wealth creation and capture by private enterprise firms operating in environments of rapid technological change, and suggests that private wealth creation in regimes of rapid technology change depends in large measure on honing intemal technological, organizational, and managerial processes inside the firm.
Journal ArticleDOI

On the evaluation of structural equation models

TL;DR: In this article, structural equation models with latent variables are defined, critiqued, and illustrated, and an overall program for model evaluation is proposed based upon an interpretation of converging and diverging evidence.
Related Papers (5)