scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted Content

Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms

TLDR
The findings suggest that the previously asserted direct effect of structural differentiation on ambidexterity operates through informal senior team and formal organizational integration mechanisms, and contributes to a greater clarity and better understanding of how organizations may effectively pursue exploration and exploitation simultaneously to achieve ambideXterity.
Abstract
textPrior studies have emphasized that structural attributes are crucial to simultaneously pursuing exploration and exploitation, yet our understanding of antecedents of ambidexterity is still limited. Structural differentiation can help ambidextrous organizations to maintain multiple inconsistent and conflicting demands; however, differentiated exploratory and exploitative activities need to mobilized, coordinated, integrated, and applied. Based on this idea, we delineate formal and informal senior team integration mechanisms (i.e. contingency rewards and social integration) and formal and informal organizational integration mechanisms (i.e. cross-functional interfaces and connectedness) and examine how they mediate the relationship between structural differentiation and ambidexterity. Overall, our findings suggest that the previously asserted direct effect of structural differentiation on ambidexterity operates through informal senior team (i.e. senior team social integration) and formal organizational (i.e. cross-functional interfaces) integration mechanisms. Through this richer explanation and empirical assessment, we contribute to a greater clarity and better understanding of how organizations may effectively pursue exploration and exploitation simultaneously to achieve ambidexterity.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Exploration and exploitation within and across intra-organisational domains and their reactions to firm-level failure

TL;DR: It is found that failure experience stimulates technological search but not market search within domains, and a negative relationship between firms’ innovation experience and exploration orientation within domains is found.
Journal ArticleDOI

Pull the Right Levers: Creating Internationally “Useful” Subsidiary Competence by Organizational Architecture

TL;DR: In this article, the effect of formal organizational architecture on the extent to which a subsidiary creates competence that is "useful" to other units of a multinational corporation (MNC).
Journal ArticleDOI

Does ambidexterity in marketing pay off? The role of absorptive capacity

TL;DR: The authors examined marketing ambidexterity (MA) as balanced levels of exploitation and exploration across marketing activities and tested how firm-level absorptive capacity (AC) moderates the MA-firm performance relationship, finding that MA is positively associated with sales growth for firms with relatively strong AC.
Journal ArticleDOI

Formalisation and flexibilisation in organisations - Dynamic and selective approaches in corporate innovation processes

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors focus on the tension between formalization and flexibilisation in corporate innovation projects and derive a way to break down formalisation and flexiblity into the dimensions of power, communication and trust and connect them to learning.
Journal ArticleDOI

Synergies and tensions between and within domestic and international market activities of firms

TL;DR: The authors examined the role of domestic market activities for the internationalizing firm through the theoretical lens of exploitation and exploration and found that both the dynamics between domestic and international market activities and the interplay between exploitation-exploration are intrinsically concerned with synergies and tensions.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.

TL;DR: This article seeks to make theorists and researchers aware of the importance of not using the terms moderator and mediator interchangeably by carefully elaborating the many ways in which moderators and mediators differ, and delineates the conceptual and strategic implications of making use of such distinctions with regard to a wide range of phenomena.
Book ChapterDOI

Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined the link between firm resources and sustained competitive advantage and analyzed the potential of several firm resources for generating sustained competitive advantages, including value, rareness, imitability, and substitutability.
Journal ArticleDOI

Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that the ability of a firm to recognize the value of new, external information, assimilate it, and apply it to commercial ends is critical to its innovative capabilities.
Journal ArticleDOI

Dynamic capabilities and strategic management

TL;DR: The dynamic capabilities framework as mentioned in this paper analyzes the sources and methods of wealth creation and capture by private enterprise firms operating in environments of rapid technological change, and suggests that private wealth creation in regimes of rapid technology change depends in large measure on honing intemal technological, organizational, and managerial processes inside the firm.
Journal ArticleDOI

On the evaluation of structural equation models

TL;DR: In this article, structural equation models with latent variables are defined, critiqued, and illustrated, and an overall program for model evaluation is proposed based upon an interpretation of converging and diverging evidence.
Related Papers (5)