scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

The 2019 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for IgG4-related disease

TLDR
In this article, an international multispecialty group of 86 physicians was assembled by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR).
Abstract
IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) can cause fibroinflammatory lesions in nearly any organ. Correlation among clinical, serological, radiological and pathological data is required for diagnosis. This work was undertaken to develop and validate an international set of classification criteria for IgG4-RD. An international multispecialty group of 86 physicians was assembled by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR). Investigators used consensus exercises; existing literature; derivation and validation cohorts of 1879 subjects (1086 cases, 793 mimickers); and multicriterion decision analysis to identify, weight and test potential classification criteria. Two independent validation cohorts were included. A three-step classification process was developed. First, it must be demonstrated that a potential IgG4-RD case has involvement of at least one of 11 possible organs in a manner consistent with IgG4-RD. Second, exclusion criteria consisting of a total of 32 clinical, serological, radiological and pathological items must be applied; the presence of any of these criteria eliminates the patient from IgG4-RD classification. Third, eight weighted inclusion criteria domains, addressing clinical findings, serological results, radiological assessments and pathological interpretations, are applied. In the first validation cohort, a threshold of 20 points had a specificity of 99.2% (95% CI 97.2% to 99.8%) and a sensitivity of 85.5% (95% CI 81.9% to 88.5%). In the second, the specificity was 97.8% (95% CI 93.7% to 99.2%) and the sensitivity was 82.0% (95% CI 77.0% to 86.1%). The criteria were shown to have robust test characteristics over a wide range of thresholds. ACR/EULAR classification criteria for IgG4-RD have been developed and validated in a large cohort of patients. These criteria demonstrate excellent test performance and should contribute substantially to future clinical, epidemiological and basic science investigations.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

IgG4-related disease: an update on pathophysiology and implications for clinical care.

TL;DR: The central role of B cells in the disease has been demonstrated by both the robust clinical responsiveness of IgG4-RD to B cell depletion and by the identification of multiple self-antigens that promote B cell expansion.
Journal ArticleDOI

The 2020 revised comprehensive diagnostic (RCD) criteria for IgG4-RD.

TL;DR: The Japanese IgG4 team has updated the 2011 comprehensive diagnostic criteria for IgG 4-RD and proposed the 2020 revised comprehensive diagnostic (RCD) criteria for igG4-RD, which consists of 3 domains; 1) Clinical and radiological features, 2) Serological diagnosis and 3) Pathological diagnosis.
Journal ArticleDOI

Advances in the diagnosis and management of IgG4 related disease

TL;DR: IgG4 related disease was recognized as a unified disease entity only 15 years ago as mentioned in this paper, and specialists are now familiar with most of its clinical manifestations, including the involvement of the pancreato-biliary tract, retroperitoneum/aorta, head and neck, and salivary glands.
Journal ArticleDOI

Fibroblast Activation Protein-Targeted PET/CT with 68Ga-FAPI for Imaging IgG4-Related Disease: Comparison to 18F-FDG PET/CT.

TL;DR: 68Ga-FAPI might be a promising imaging agent for the assessment of IgG4-RD and demonstrated significantly higher uptake than 18F-FDG in the matched disease in the pancreas, bile duct/liver, and salivary gland.
Journal ArticleDOI

European Guideline on IgG4-related digestive disease – UEG and SGF evidence-based recommendations:

TL;DR: Treatment with glucocorticoids should be weight-based and initiated at a dose of 0.6–0.8 mg/kg body weight/day orally for 1 month to induce remission and then be tapered within two additional months.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative.

TL;DR: This new classification system redefines the current paradigm of RA by focusing on features at earlier stages of disease that are associated with persistent and/or erosive disease, rather than defining the disease by its late-stage features.
Journal ArticleDOI

2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative.

TL;DR: This new classification system redefines the current paradigm of RA by focusing on features at earlier stages of disease that are associated with persistent and/or erosive disease, rather than defining the disease by its late-stage features.
Journal ArticleDOI

Basic principles of ROC analysis

TL;DR: ROC analysis is shown to be related in a direct and natural way to cost/benefit analysis of diagnostic decision making and the concepts of "average diagnostic cost" and "average net benefit" are developed and used to identify the optimal compromise among various kinds of diagnostic error.
Journal ArticleDOI

2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: An american college of rheumatology/European league against rheumatism collaborative initiative

Frank H J van den Hoogen, +46 more
TL;DR: The ACR/EULAR classification criteria for SSc performed better than the 1980 ACR criteria and should allow for more patients to be classified correctly as having the disease.
Related Papers (5)