scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Who Is Paying for Carbon Dioxide Removal? Designing Policy Instruments for Mobilizing Negative Emissions Technologies

TLDR
In this paper, the authors develop six functions jointly needed for policy mixes mobilizing carbon dioxide removal in a manner compatible with the Paris Agreement's objectives, and chart a path to a meaningful long-term structuring of policies and financing instruments.
Abstract
Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) poses a significant and complex public policy challenge in the long-term. Presently treated as a marginal aspect of climate policy, addressing CDR as a public good is quickly becoming essential for limiting warming to well below 2°C or 1.5°C by achieving net-zero emissions in time – including by mobilization of public and private finance. In this policy and practice review, we develop six functions jointly needed for policy mixes mobilizing CDR in a manner compatible with the Paris Agreement’s objectives. We discuss the emerging CDR financing efforts in light of these functions, and we chart a path to a meaningful long-term structuring of policies and financing instruments. CDR characteristics point to the need for up-front capital, continuous funding for scaling, and long-term operating funding streams, as well as differentiation based on permanence of storage and should influence the design of policy instruments. Transparency and early public deliberation are essential for charting a politically stable course of action on CDR, while specific policy designs are being developed in a way that ensures effectiveness, prevents rent-seeking at public expense, and allows for iterative course corrections. We propose a stepwise approach whereby various CDR approaches initially need differentiated treatment based on their differing maturity and cost through R&D pilot activity subsidies. In the longer term, CDR increasingly ought to be funded through mitigation results-oriented financing and included in broader policy instruments. We conclude that CDR needs to become a regularly-provided public service like public waste management has become over the last century.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

State of Climate Action 2022

TL;DR: The State of Climate Action 2022 provides a comprehensive assessment of the global gap in climate action across the world's highest-emitting systems, highlighting where recent progress made in reducing GHG emissions, scaling up carbon removal, and increasing climate finance must accelerate over the next decade to keep the Paris Agreement's goal to limit warming to 1.5°C within reach as discussed by the authors .
Journal ArticleDOI

Framework for Assessing the Feasibility of Carbon Dioxide Removal Options Within the National Context of Germany

TL;DR: In this paper , the authors proposed a framework that considers the environmental, technological, economic, social, institutional, and systemic implications of upscaling carbon dioxide removal (CDR) options.
Journal ArticleDOI

European Carbon Dioxide Removal Policy: Current Status and Future Opportunities

TL;DR: In this article, the authors highlight the arguments for near-term development of a comprehensive carbon removal policy framework and highlight the current status of negative emission technologies and the role of carbon capture and storage in delivering negative emissions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Why residual emissions matter right now

TL;DR: In this paper , the authors analyzed governments' long-term strategies submitted to the UNFCCC to explore projections of residual emissions, including amounts and sectors, and found substantial levels of residual emission at net-zero greenhouse gas emissions, on average 18% of current emissions for Annex I countries.
Journal ArticleDOI

The ABC of Governance Principles for Carbon Dioxide Removal Policy

TL;DR: In this paper , governance principles from legislative texts, the climate governance literature, and the carbon dioxide removal (CDR) literature with relevance to CDR policy considerations are discussed for evaluating policy options.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Climate Strategy with Co2 Capture from the Air

TL;DR: Air capture differs from conventional mitigation in three key aspects: it removes emissions from any part of the economy with equal ease or difficulty, so its cost provides an absolute cap on the cost of mitigation as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

Potential market niches for biomass energy with CO2 capture and storage—Opportunities for energy supply with negative CO2 emissions

TL;DR: In this article, an analysis of biomass energy with CO2 capture and storage (BECS) in industrial applications is presented, where sugar cane-based ethanol mills and chemical pulp mills are identified as market niches with promising prospects for BECS.
Related Papers (5)