Showing papers on "Afatinib published in 2013"
Harvard University1, National Taiwan University2, Trinity College, Dublin3, McGill University4, The Chinese University of Hong Kong5, Prince of Songkla University6, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital7, National Cheng Kung University8, Chungbuk National University9, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust10, Boehringer Ingelheim11, University of Duisburg-Essen12
TL;DR: The LUX-Lung 3 study as mentioned in this paper investigated the efficacy of chemotherapy compared with afatinib, a selective, orally bioavailable ErbB family blocker that irreversibly blocks signaling from epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR/ErbB1), human epIDERmal growth factors receptor 2 (HER2/ERbB2), and ErbbB4 and has wide-spectrum preclinical activity against EGFR mutations.
Abstract: Purpose The LUX-Lung 3 study investigated the efficacy of chemotherapy compared with afatinib, a selective, orally bioavailable ErbB family blocker that irreversibly blocks signaling from epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR/ErbB1), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/ErbB2), and ErbB4 and has wide-spectrum preclinical activity against EGFR mutations. A phase II study of afatinib in EGFR mutation–positive lung adenocarcinoma demonstrated high response rates and progression-free survival (PFS). Patients and Methods In this phase III study, eligible patients with stage IIIB/IV lung adenocarcinoma were screened for EGFR mutations. Mutation-positive patients were stratified by mutation type (exon 19 deletion, L858R, or other) and race (Asian or non-Asian) before two-to-one random assignment to 40 mg afatinib per day or up to six cycles of cisplatin plus pemetrexed chemotherapy at standard doses every 21 days. The primary end point was PFS by independent review. Secondary end points included tumor...
2,550 citations
Harvard University1, National Taiwan University2, Trinity College, Dublin3, McGill University4, The Chinese University of Hong Kong5, Prince of Songkla University6, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital7, National Cheng Kung University8, Chungbuk National University9, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust10, Boehringer Ingelheim11, University of Duisburg-Essen12
TL;DR: Afatinib is associated with prolongation of PFS when compared with standard doublet chemotherapy in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and EGFR mutations.
Abstract: Purpose
The LUX-Lung 3 study investigated the efficacy of chemotherapy compared with afatinib, a selective, orally bioavailable ErbB family blocker that irreversibly blocks signaling from epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR/ErbB1), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/ErbB2), and ErbB4 and has wide-spectrum preclinical activity against EGFR mutations. A phase II study of afatinib in EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma demonstrated high response rates and progression-free survival (PFS).
Patients and Methods
In this phase III study, eligible patients with stage IIIB/IV lung adenocarcinoma were screened for EGFR mutations. Mutation-positive patients were stratified by mutation type (exon 19 deletion, L858R, or other) and race (Asian or non-Asian) before two-to-one random assignment to 40 mg afatinib per day or up to six cycles of cisplatin plus pemetrexed chemotherapy at standard doses every 21 days. The primary end point was PFS by independent review. Secondary end points included tumor response, overall survival, adverse events, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).
Results
A total of 1,269 patients were screened, and 345 were randomly assigned to treatment. Median PFS was 11.1 months for afatinib and 6.9 months for chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.78; P = .001). Median PFS among those with exon 19 deletions and L858R EGFR mutations (n = 308) was 13.6 months for afatinib and 6.9 months for chemotherapy (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.65; P = .001). The most common treatmentrelated adverse events were diarrhea, rash/acne, and stomatitis for afatinib and nausea, fatigue, and decreased appetite for chemotherapy. PROs favored afatinib, with better control of cough, dyspnea, and pain.
Conclusion
Afatinib is associated with prolongation of PFS when compared with standard doublet chemotherapy in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and EGFR mutations.
2,380 citations
TL;DR: Crystal structure and detailed analysis of different EGFR mutants explain why some mutations in exon 20 make lung cancers resistant to EGFR inhibitors and others make them more sensitive to TKIs, and how to design drugs that exploit the unique structural features of resistant mutants and specifically target them for treatment.
Abstract: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations (G719X, exon 19 deletions/insertions, L858R, and L861Q) predict favorable responses to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations (~10% of all EGFR mutations) are generally associated with insensitivity to available TKIs (gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib). The basis of this primary resistance is poorly understood. We studied a broad subset of exon 20 insertion mutations, comparing in vitro TKI sensitivity with responses to gefitinib and erlotinib in NSCLC patients, and found that most are resistant to EGFR TKIs. The crystal structure of a representative TKI-insensitive mutant (D770_N771insNPG) reveals an unaltered adenosine triphosphate-binding pocket, and the inserted residues form a wedge at the end of the C helix that promotes the active kinase conformation. Unlike EGFR-L858R, D770_N771insNPG activates EGFR without increasing its affinity for EGFR TKIs. Unexpectedly, we find that EGFR-A763_Y764insFQEA is highly sensitive to EGFR TKIs in vitro, and patients whose NSCLCs harbor this mutation respond to erlotinib. Analysis of the A763_Y764insFQEA mutant indicates that the inserted residues shift the register of the C helix in the N-terminal direction, altering the structure in the region that is also affected by the TKI-sensitive EGFR-L858R. Our studies reveal intricate differences between EGFR mutations, their biology, and their response to EGFR TKIs.
424 citations
TL;DR: Afatinib demonstrated modest but noteworthy efficacy in patients with NSCLC who had received third- or fourth-line treatment and who progressed while receiving erlotinib and/or gefitinib, including those with acquired resistance to erlot inib, gef itin ib, or both.
Abstract: Purpose New molecular targeted agents are needed for patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who progress while receiving erlotinib, gefitinib, or both. Afatinib, an oral irreversible ErbB family blocker, has preclinical activity in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR [ErbB1]) mutant models with EGFR-activating mutations, including T790M. Patients and Methods This was a Japanese single-arm phase II trial conducted in patients with stage IIIB to IV pulmonary adenocarcinoma who progressed after ≥ 12 weeks of prior erlotinib and/or gefitinib. Patients received afatinib 50 mg per day. The primary end point was objective response rate (complete response or partial response) by independent review. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results Of 62 treated patients, 45 (72.6%) were EGFR mutation positive in their primary tumor according to local and/or central laboratory analyses. Fifty-one patients (82.3%) fulfilled the criteria of acquire...
306 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, a randomized, phase III trial of Afatinib or cisplatin/pemetrexed was conducted to investigate patient-reported symptoms and health-related quality of life (QoL) benefits.
Abstract: Purpose Patient-reported symptoms and health-related quality of life (QoL) benefits were investigated in a randomized, phase III trial of afatinib or cisplatin/pemetrexed. Patients and Methods Three hundred forty-five patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation–positive lung adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned 2:1 to afatinib 40 mg per day or up to six cycles of cisplatin/pemetrexed. Lung cancer symptoms and health-related QoL were assessed every 21 days until progression using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 and Lung Cancer-13 questionnaires. Analyses of cough, dyspnea, and pain were preplanned, including percentage of patients who improved on therapy, time to deterioration of symptoms, and change in symptoms over time. Results Questionnaire compliance was high. Compared with chemotherapy, afatinib significantly delayed the time to deterioration for cough (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.87; P = .007...
276 citations
TL;DR: The results suggest that inducing miR-146a might be a therapeutic strategy for NSCLC, and suggests that its effects are due to its targeting of EGFR and NF-κB signaling.
Abstract: Aberrant expression of microRNA-146a (miR-146a) has been reported to be involved in the development and progression of various types of cancers. However, its role in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been elucidated. The aim of this study was to investigate the contribution of miR-146a to various aspects of the malignant phenotype of human NSCLCs. In functional experiments, miR-146a suppressed cell growth, induced cellular apoptosis and inhibited EGFR downstream signaling in five NSCLC cell lines (H358, H1650, H1975, HCC827 and H292). miR-146a also inhibited the migratory capacity of these NSCLC cells. On the other hand, miR-146a enhanced the inhibition of cell proliferation by drugs targeting EGFR, including both TKIs (gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib) and a monoclonal antibody (cetuximab). These effects were independent of the EGFR mutation status (wild type, sensitizing mutation or resistance mutation), but were less potent compared to the effects of siRNA targeting of EGFR. Our results suggest that these effects of miR-146a are due to its targeting of EGFR and NF-κB signaling. We also found, in clinical formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) lung cancer samples, that low expression of miR-146a was correlated with advanced clinical TNM stages and distant metastasis in NSCLC (P<0.05). The patients with high miR-146a expression in their tumors showed longer progression-free survival (25.6 weeks in miR-146a high patients vs. 4.8 weeks in miR-146a low patients, P<0.05). miR-146a is therefore a strong candidate prognostic biomarker in NSCLC. Thus inducing miR-146a might be a therapeutic strategy for NSCLC.
237 citations
TL;DR: Oral afatinib has been approved in the US for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer who have tumours with EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 (L858R) substitution mutations as detected by a US FDA-approved test.
Abstract: Afatinib, an irreversible inhibitor of the ErbB family of tyrosine kinases, is under development with Boehringer Ingelheim for the once-daily, oral treatment of cancer. Afatinib downregulates ErbB signalling by covalently binding to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 2 and HER4, irreversibly inhibiting tyrosine kinase autophosphorylation. It also inhibits transphosphorylation of HER3. Oral afatinib (Gilotrif™) has been approved in the US for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have tumours with EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 (L858R) substitution mutations as detected by a US FDA-approved test. Afatinib has also been approved in Taiwan for the first-line treatment of patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. In addition, the European Medicines Agency's Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use has recommended the approval of afatinib (Giotrif®) for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with activating EGFR mutations who are EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor naive. Afatinib is also under regulatory review in Canada, Japan and other Asian countries. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of afatinib, leading to this first approval in patients with metastatic NSCLC.
224 citations
TL;DR: The identification of T790M as acquired resistance mechanism was clinically feasible and further research is necessary to identify patients with T790 M-mutant tumors who might benefit from newly developed T790m-specific TKIs.
103 citations
TL;DR: This study compared the safety and efficacy of first-line A with GC in EGFR M+ Asian pts and found PFS was significantly prolonged with A compared with GC by independent review.
Abstract: 8016 Background: A is an oral, irreversible, ErbB Family Blocker, blocking signaling from EGFR (ErbB1), HER2 (ErbB2) and ErbB4. A was superior to first-line pemetrexed/cisplatin in a global phase I...
93 citations
TL;DR: Clinically, afatinib has been evaluated in the LUX-Lung series of trials, with improvement in progression-free survival reported in patients with EGFR-activating mutations in both first- and second-/third-line settings when compared to chemotherapy.
Abstract: The discovery of epidermal growth-factor receptor (EGFR)-activating mutations and the introduction of oral EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) have expanded the treatment options for patients with non-small cell lung cancer. The first two reversible EGFR-TKIs, erlotinib and gefitinib, are approved for use in the first-line setting in patients with known EGFR-activating mutations and in the second- and third-line settings for all NSCLC patients. These first-generation EGFR-TKIs improve progression-free survival when compared to chemotherapy in patients with EGFR-activating mutations in the first-line setting. However, nearly all patients develop resistance to EGFR-directed agents. There is a need for further therapy options for patients with disease progression after treatment with reversible EGFR-TKIs. Afatinib is an irreversible ErbB family blocker that inhibits EGFR, HER2, and HER4. In vitro and in vivo, afatinib have shown increased inhibition of the common EGFR-activating mutations as well as the T790M resistance mutation when compared to erlotinib and gefitinib. Clinically, afatinib has been evaluated in the LUX-Lung series of trials, with improvement in progression-free survival reported in patients with EGFR-activating mutations in both first- and second-/third-line settings when compared to chemotherapy. Further investigation is needed to determine the precise role that afatinib will play in the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and EGFR-activating mutations.
89 citations
TL;DR: Afatinib demonstrated antitumor activity in HER2-positive gastric cancer in vivo and demonstrated the pharmacodynamic effects of afatinib in NCI-N87 xenografts using 89Zr-trastuzumab and 18F-FDG PET.
Abstract: We evaluated the ability of the PET imaging agent 89Zr-trastuzumab to delineate HER2-positive gastric cancer and to monitor the pharmacodynamic effects of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) tyrosine kinase inhibitor afatinib. Methods: Using 89 Zr-trastuzumab, 18 F-FDG, or 39-deoxy-39- 18 F-fluorothymidine ( 18 F-FLT PET), we imaged HER2-positive NCI-N87 and HER2negative MKN74 gastric cancer xenografts in mice. Next, we examined the pharmacodynamic effects of afatinib in NCI-N87 xenografts using 89Zr-trastuzumab and 18F-FDG PET and comparing imaging results to changes in tumor size and in protein expression as monitored by Western blot and histologic studies. Results: Although 18 F-FDG uptake in NCI-N87 tumors did not change, a decrease in 89Zr-trastuzumab uptake was observed in the afatinib-treated versus control groups (3.0 6 0.0 percentage injected dose per gram (%ID/g) vs. 21.0 6 3.4 %ID/g, respectively; P , 0.05). 89 Zr-trastuzumab PET results corresponded with tumor reduction, apoptosis, and downregulation of HER2 observed on treatment with afatinib. Downregulation of total HER2, phosphorylated (p)-HER2, and p-EGFR occurred within 24 h of the first dose of afatinib, with a sustained effect over 21 d of treatment. Conclusion: Afatinib demonstrated antitumor activity in HER2-positive gastric cancer in vivo. 89Zr-trastuzumab PET spe
TL;DR: The pharmacokinetic profile of afatinib supports a once-daily dosage regimen and shows moderate to high inter-patient variability, as expected for this patient population.
Abstract: Afatinib is a potent, irreversible, ErbB family blocker in clinical development for the treatment of a variety of solid tumours. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of afatinib (10–100 mg once daily) in cancer patients. Data from 221 patients with advanced solid tumours in four phase I and one phase II trial were analysed using non-compartmental methods. Within each dose group, the shape of the geometric mean plasma concentration–time profiles after single and multiple doses were comparable. Maximum plasma concentration (C
max) values were achieved 2–5 h after dosing and thereafter declined at least bi-exponentially. Steady-state plasma concentrations were attained within 8 days after the start of dosing. The geometric mean terminal elimination half-life at steady state was about 37 h. Repeated dosing resulted in a 2.77-fold accumulation based on the area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC), and 2.11-fold accumulation based on C
max values. A slightly more than dose-proportional increase in afatinib exposure was observed. There was moderate intra-individual variability in afatinib trough concentration values (the geometric coefficient of variation (gCV) ranged from 22.2 to 67.5 %). The inter-patient variability in plasma concentrations was moderate to high (e.g. at the 40 mg dose, the gCVs ranged from 35.6 to 221 %). The exposure to afatinib (as measured by AUC and C
max) correlated with the severity of the most common adverse events of afatinib—diarrhoea and rash. The pharmacokinetic profile of afatinib supports a once-daily dosage regimen. As expected for this patient population, the pharmacokinetic parameters of afatinib showed moderate to high inter-patient variability. Afatinib exhibits non-linear pharmacokinetics.
TL;DR: To fully exploit the clinical activity of afatinib, proactive management of its gastrointestinal and dermatologic toxicities is advised.
Abstract: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) consists of several histomorphologically defined phenotypes that display an enormous genetic variability. In recent years, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma has emerged as a unique subset of NSCLC in terms of etiopathogenesis and tumor biology. Since the introduction of the reversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) erlotinib and gefitinib, patients with metastatic EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer can be offered a therapeutic alternative that has proven its superiority over standard platinum-based chemotherapy. However, primary or acquired resistance limits the therapeutic success of these targeted agents. Irreversible inhibitors targeting all ErbB family receptor tyrosine kinases, such as afatinib and dacomitinib, have been developed to confer sustained disease control in ErbB-dependent cancers. The large LUX-Lung 3 phase III trial recently reported afatinib to be clearly superior over the most effective platinum doublet in patients with EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer. To fully exploit the clinical activity of afatinib, proactive management of its gastrointestinal and dermatologic toxicities is advised.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors summarized current data on afatinib-associated diarrhea and provided strategies for its management, including patient education, early identification, timely management and ongoing assessment, encouraging patient compliance and allowing patients to obtain the maximum therapeutic benefit from this agent.
Abstract: Gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs) are frequently observed in patients receiving EGF receptor (EGFR; also known as HER1 or ErbB1) tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. GI AEs are among the most common and most impactful on a patient's quality of life. Severe diarrhea can result in fluid and electrolyte losses, leading to dehydration, electrolyte imbalances and renal insufficiency. Afatinib is an irreversible, oral, ErbB family blocker, inhibiting EGFR (ErbB1), HER2 (ErbB2) and ErbB4 receptor kinases. It also inhibits transphosphorylation of ErbB3. Similar to reversible tyrosine kinase inhibitors of EGFR, GI AEs - in particular, diarrhea - have frequently been observed in afatinib-treated patients. This article summarizes current data on afatinib-associated diarrhea and provides strategies for its management. Patient education, early identification, timely management and ongoing assessment will help to prevent aggravation, afatinib dose reductions or therapy discontinuation, encouraging patient compliance and allowing patients to obtain the maximum therapeutic benefit from this agent.
TL;DR: The rationale for the development of targeted therapies in NSCLC and the various strategies employed in preventing or overcoming the inevitable occurrence of treatment resistance are focused on.
Abstract: The iterative discovery in various malignancies during the past decades that a number of aberrant tumorigenic processes and signal transduction pathways are mediated by "druggable" protein kinases has led to a revolutionary change in drug development. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the ErbB family of receptors (e.g., EGFR [epidermal growth factor receptor], HER2 [human epidermal growth factor receptor 2]), RAS (rat sarcoma gene), BRAF (v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1), MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) c-MET (c-mesenchymal-epithelial transition), FGFR (fibroblast growth factor receptor), DDR2 (discoidin domain receptor 2), PIK3CA (phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate3-kinase, catalytic subunit alpha)), PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog), AKT (protein kinase B), ALK (anaplastic lym phoma kinase), RET (rearranged during transfection), ROS1 (reactive oxygen species 1) and EPH (erythropoietin-producing hepatoma) are key targets of various agents currently in clinical development. These oncogenic targets exert their selective growth advantage through various intercommunicating pathways, such as through RAS/RAF/MEK, phosphoinositide 3-kinase/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin and SRC-signal transduction and transcription signaling. The recent clinical studies, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors and crizotinib were considered as strongly effective targeted therapies in metastatic NSCLC. Currently, five molecular targeted agents were approved for treatment of advanced NSCLC: Gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib for positive EGFR mutation, crizotinib for positive echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4)-ALK translocation and bevacizumab. Moreover, oncogenic mutant proteins are subject to regulation by protein trafficking pathways, specifically through the heat shock protein 90 system. Drug combinations affecting various nodes in these signaling and intracellular processes are predicted and demonstrated to be synergistic and advantageous in overcoming treatment resistance compared with monotherapy approaches. Understanding the role of the tumor microenvironment in the development and maintenance of the malignant phenotype provided additional therapeutic approaches as well. More recently, improved knowledge on tumor immunology has set the stage for promising immunotherapies in NSCLC. This review will focus on the rationale for the development of targeted therapies in NSCLC and the various strategies employed in preventing or overcoming the inevitable occurrence of treatment resistance.
TL;DR: It is found that the inhibition of glycolysis using 2-deoxy-d-glucose (2DG) improves the efficacy of afatinib in H1975 and PC9-GR NSCLC cells with EGFR T790M, and the combined use of an inhibitor of glucose metabolism and afatinIB is a potential therapeutic strategy for the treatment of patients with acquired resistance to reversible EGFR-TKIs.
Abstract: The secondary EGF receptor (EGFR) T790M is the most common mechanism of resistance to reversible EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with activating EGFR mutations. Although afatinib (BIBW2992), a second-generation irreversible EGFR-TKI, was expected to overcome the acquired resistance, it showed limited efficacy in a recent phase III clinical study. In this study, we found that the inhibition of glycolysis using 2-deoxy-d-glucose (2DG) improves the efficacy of afatinib in H1975 and PC9-GR NSCLC cells with EGFR T790M. Treatment with the combination of 2DG and afatinib induced intracellular ATP depletion in both H1975 and PC9-GR cells, resulting in activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). AMPK activation played a central role in the cytotoxicity of the combined treatment with 2DG and afatinib through the inhibition of mTOR. The alteration of the AMPK/mTOR signaling pathway by the inhibition of glucose metabolism induced specific downregulation of Mcl-1, a member of the antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family, through translational control. The enhancement of afatinib sensitivity by 2DG was confirmed in the in vivo PC9-GR xenograft model. In conclusion, this study examined whether the inhibition of glucose metabolism using 2DG enhances sensitivity to afatinib in NSCLC cells with EGFR T790M through the regulation of the AMPK/mTOR/Mcl-1 signaling pathway. These data suggest that the combined use of an inhibitor of glucose metabolism and afatinib is a potential therapeutic strategy for the treatment of patients with acquired resistance to reversible EGFR-TKIs due to secondary EGFR T790M.
TL;DR: Primary resistance mechanisms associated with progression are better known: clonal selection of EGFR resistance mutation (T790M mutation in exon 20), amplification of transmembrane receptors for other growth factors, downstream molecular alterations in EGFR signaling pathway, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition or transdifferentiation to small-cell cancer.
Abstract: Activating mutation in exons 19 or 21 of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC) are associated with increased sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), such as gefitinib and erlotinib. Cancer patients harboring activating EGFR mutations benefit from first-line TKI therapy. Yet 10% of patients present a primary TKI resistance, while 50% of the others develop a secondary resistance within 9-12 months after starting TKI. The RECIST's definition of progression appears flawed when applied to EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients. Most often, tumor volume shrinking widely exceeds 30% during TKI response and kinetics of growth is low during relapse. At present, secondary resistance mechanisms associated with progression are better known: clonal selection of EGFR resistance mutation (T790M mutation in exon 20), amplification of transmembrane receptors for other growth factors (c-met, HER family, IGF1R, or AXL), downstream molecular alterations in EGFR signaling pathway (PI3K or PTEN), and epithelial-mesenchymal transition or transdifferentiation to small-cell cancer. The best strategy for secondary resistance is not well-defined: maintaining TKI therapy, switching to chemotherapy, combining both treatments, or using new therapies targeting other signaling pathways.
TL;DR: Current data on the dermatologic AEs associated with afatinib treatment across the clinical trial program is summarized, and strategies for their effective management are provided.
Abstract: Dermatologic adverse events (AEs) are frequently observed in patients receiving EGF receptor (EGFR; also known as ErbB1) tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. The impact of these AEs goes beyond cosmesis to the discomfort from itching, pain and secondary infections, all of which may significantly impact on patient well-being, adherence and clinical outcomes. Afatinib is a potent, irreversible, oral, ErbB family blocker, inhibiting EGFR (ErbB1), HER2 (ErbB2) and ErbB4 receptor kinases. It also inhibits transphosphorylation of ErbB3. Similar to EGFR inhibitors, dermatologic AEs have been frequently observed in patients treated with afatinib. Papulopustular (acneiform) rash, pruritus, xerosis, paronychia and alopecia will require patient education and proactive treatment interventions. This article summarizes current data on the dermatologic AEs associated with afatinib treatment across the clinical trial program, and provides strategies for their effective management.
TL;DR: In the LUX-Lung 1 trial, the addition of afatinib to BSC significantly improved non–small-cell lung cancer–related symptoms, fatigue, physical functioning, and HRQoL and significantly delayed time to deterioration of cough.
TL;DR: The hypotheses and data that provide the rationale for the development of targeted agents for third- and fourth-line treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory NSCLC are reviewed.
TL;DR: This landmark phase III effort comparing afatinib with standard chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC and EGFR mutation is distinguished by a number of factors, including being the largest trial to date in the first-line EGFR mutant setting to be published; it is the first randomized phase III trial to compare a second-generation irreversible EGFR TKI with activity against both human epidermal growth factor receptor 1 and HER2 versus platinum-based cytotoxics.
Abstract: In the last decade we have witnessed a major evolution in both molecular diagnostics and individualized therapy in the management of advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The identification of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and the centrality of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients whose tumors harbor these mutations have irrevocably altered how we view NSCLC. The more recent recognition of echinoderm microtubuleassociated protein-like 4/anaplastic lymphoma kinase and ROS1 translocations as molecular drivers, for which specific treatment exists, has altered our perspective still more. NSCLC is no longer considered a monolithic illness, but it is now readily recognized as a constellation of genotypic entities for which targeted therapy has an increasing role. In this regard, despite clinical, radiographic, and even histologic similarities from tumor to tumor, the genotypic footprint, one believes, should ultimately trump phenotype when it comes to therapeutic decision making. As part of this evolution, we are now observing the second wave of EGFR TKIs. In their seminal article, Sequist et al highlight the results of the LUX-Lung 3 trial, which compared afatinib, a secondgeneration irreversible TKI, to cisplatin and pemetrexed in the firstline treatment of treatment-naive patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung and EGFR mutation. Afatinib is clearly superior with respect to response rate (RR) and progression-free survival (PFS), and these benefits are even more pronounced in the vast majority of patients whose tumors harbor the common activating mutations in exons 19 and 21 (Table 1). In this regard, the LUX-Lung 3 trial joins a number of other trials examining erlotinib and gefitinib in the identical therapeutic setting, each of which has consistently shown a statistically significant and clinically meaningful RR and PFS benefit compared with standard chemotherapy (Table 2). Although many would argue that the results of the LUX-Lung 3 trial were entirely expected and scarcely surprising, this landmark phase III effort comparing afatinib with standard chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC and EGFR mutation is distinguished by a number of factors. It is the largest trial to date in the first-line EGFR mutant setting to be published; it is the first randomized phase III trial to compare a second-generation irreversible EGFR TKI with activity against both human epidermal growth factor receptor 1 (HER1) and HER2 versus platinum-based cytotoxics; it employs a state-of-the-art comparator (pemetrexed and cisplatin); it fully integrates quality-oflife (QoL) evaluation into outcome analysis; it is the first global trial of this sort; and it is explicitly a registration trial. Among those trials that have been confined to patients with actionable EGFR mutations, this trial enrolled nearly double the number of participants, well over 300, making it far more robust and thereby tightening the CIs around the benefits already noted in similar studies. The global nature of this trial and its size make the findings a Table 1. Top-Line Results of the LUX-Lung 3 Trial
TL;DR: Simultaneous blockade of HER2 and EGFR should be an effective treatment strategy against HER2 gene–amplified breast cancer cells harboring T798M mutant alleles.
Abstract: Purpose: Mutations in receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) genes can confer resistance to receptor-targeted therapies. A T798M mutation in the HER2 oncogene has been shown to confer resistance to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) lapatinib. We studied the mechanisms of HER2-T798M–induced resistance to identify potential strategies to overcome that resistance. Experimental Design: HER2-T798M was stably expressed in BT474 and MCF10A cells. Mutant cells and xenografts were evaluated for effects of the mutation on proliferation, signaling, and tumor growth after treatment with combinations of inhibitors targeting the EGFR/HER2/HER3/PI3K axis. Results: A low 3% allelic frequency of the T798M mutant shifted 10-fold the IC 50 of lapatinib. In mutant-expressing cells, lapatinib did not block basal phosphorylation of HER2, HER3, AKT, and ERK1/2. In vitro kinase assays showed increased autocatalytic activity of HER2-T798M. HER3 association with PI3K p85 was increased in mutant-expressing cells. BT474-T798M cells were also resistant to the HER2 antibody trastuzumab. These cells were sensitive to the pan-PI3K inhibitors BKM120 and XL147 and the irreversible HER2/EGFR TKI afatinib but not the MEK1/2 inhibitor CI-1040, suggesting continued dependence of the mutant cells on ErbB receptors and downstream PI3K signaling. BT474-T798M cells showed increased expression of the EGFR ligands EGF, TGFα, amphiregulin, and HB-EGF. Addition of the EGFR neutralizing antibody cetuximab or lapatinib restored trastuzumab sensitivity of BT474-T798M cells and xenografts, suggesting that increased EGFR ligand production was causally associated with drug resistance. Conclusions: Simultaneous blockade of HER2 and EGFR should be an effective treatment strategy against HER2 gene–amplified breast cancer cells harboring T798M mutant alleles. Clin Cancer Res; 19(19); 5390–401. ©2013 AACR .
TL;DR: Three recent studies investigating afatinib in this molecular subset of patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer whose tumours harbour exon 19 deletions or exon 21 (L858R) EGFR substitution mutations are discussed.
Abstract: On 15 July 2013, the FDA approved afatinib as a first-line treatment for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer whose tumours harbour exon 19 deletions or exon 21 (L858R) EGFR substitution mutations. We discuss three recent studies investigating afatinib in this molecular subset of patients.
TL;DR: Afatinib was more potent than gefitinib in tumors harboring an exon 19 deletion mutation, and the combination of afatinib with bevacizumab efficiently suppressed tumors Harboring the T790M secondary mutation.
Abstract: An irreversible ErbB family blocker is expected to inhibit tumors with activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations more strongly than reversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors and to overcome acquired resistance to the T790M secondary mutation. Eleven-week-old transgenic mice with Egfr exon 19 deletion mutation were treated with afatinib, gefitinib, or vehicle for 4 weeks. All mice were sacrificed at 15 weeks of age, and the number of superficial left lung tumors with a long axis exceeding 1 mm was counted. The afatinib-treated group had significantly fewer tumors than the vehicle group (P < 0.01) and tended to have fewer tumors than the gefitinib-treated group (P = 0.06). Pathologically, gefitinib-treated mice had clearer, more nodular tumors than afatinib-treated mice. Immunoblotting showed that afatinib suppressed not only pEGFR but also pHER2, and induced apoptosis for longer periods than gefitinib. Subsequently, when each drug was administered 5 days per week until death, afatinib significantly enhanced mouse survival compared with gefitinib (median survival time: 456 days vs. 376.5 days; log-rank test, P < 0.01). Finally, the combination of afatinib with bevacizumab was found to be superior to either drug alone in exon 19 deletion/T790M and L858R/T790M xenograft tumors. Overall, afatinib was more potent than gefitinib in tumors harboring an exon 19 deletion mutation, and the combination of afatinib with bevacizumab efficiently suppressed tumors harboring the T790M secondary mutation.
TL;DR: Findings indicate that there are highly variable mutation profiles and signalling pathway activation in TSC1‐mutant bladder cancer, and combined Hsp90/mTOR inhibition is a promising therapeutic approach for T SC1 mutant bladder cancer.
Abstract: TSC1 is often mutated in bladder cancer. However the importance of this event in disease pathogenesis and its implications for therapy are uncertain. We used genomic sequencing to examine the involvement of TSC1 in bladder cancer, and signalling pathway analysis and small-molecule screening to identify targeted therapeutic strategies in TSC1 mutant bladder cancer cell lines. TSC1 loss of heterozygosity was seen in 54% of bladder cancers. Two (4.9%) of these 41 bladder cancers had TSC1 mutations by exon-based sequencing. Analysis of 27 bladder cancer cell lines demonstrated inactivating TSC1 mutations in three: RT-4, HCV29, 97-1. Interestingly, only RT-4 showed classic feedback inhibition of AKT, and was highly sensitive to treatment with mTOR inhibitors rapamycin and Torin1. 97-1 cells showed constitutive EGFR activation, and were highly sensitive to combined treatment with the mTOR inhibitor Torin1 and EGFR inhibitors Lapatinib or Afatinib. A BRAF missense mutation G469V was found in HCV29 cells, and AKT activation was dependent on BRAF, but independent of ERK. A kinase inhibitor screen of HCV29 cells showed strong growth inhibition by the Hsp90 inhibitor NVP-AUY922, and we then found synergistic inhibitory effects of NVP-AUY922 combined with either Torin1 or rapamycin on cell survival for both HCV29 and 97-1 cells. In aggregate, these findings indicate that there are highly variable mutation profiles and signalling pathway activation in TSC1-mutant bladder cancer. Furthermore, combined Hsp90/mTOR inhibition is a promising therapeutic approach for TSC1 mutant bladder cancer.
TL;DR: Newer, second-generation EGFR TKIs have been developed with the intent to delay or overcome acquired resistance by the broader inhibition of kinases (eg, HER2 and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor) and/or altering the interactions with EGFR through irreversibly binding to the kinase domain.
Abstract: EGFR mutations identify patients who are more likely to respond to treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) than cytotoxic chemotherapy. The distinct success of the first-generation EGFR TKIs erlotinib and gefitinib has been accompanied by the observation that acquired resistance to these treatments develops after a median of 1 year of treatment. Newer, second-generation EGFR TKIs have been developed with the intent to delay or overcome acquired resistance by the broader inhibition of kinases (eg, HER2 and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor) and/or altering the interactions with EGFR through irreversibly binding to the kinase domain. This article discusses many of these agents (including afatinib, dacomitinib, XL647, AP26113, and CO-1686) which have the potential for greater efficacy compared with first-generation EGFR TKIs, and may also have clinical activity against other oncogenic mutations within the EGFR family, including HER2.
TL;DR: The findings offer preclinical proof of principle for combined inhibition as a promising treatment strategy for NSCLC, especially for patients in whom current EGFR-targeted treatments fail due to the presence of the T790M-EGFR-mutation or high c-MET expression.
Abstract: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and c-MET receptors are expressed on many non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. Current single agent therapeutic targeting of a mutant EGFR has a high efficacy in the clinic, but is not curative. Here, we investigated the combination of targeting EGFR and c-MET pathways in NSCLC cells resistant to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), using RNA interference and inhibition by TKIs. Different NSCLC cell lines with various genomic characteristics (H358, H1650 and H1975) were transfected with EGFR-specific-siRNA, T790M-specific-siRNA, c-MET siRNA or the combination. Subsequently EGFR TKIs (gefitinib, erlotinib or afatinib) or monoclonal antibody cetuximab were combined respectively with the c-MET-specific TKI su11274 in NSCLC cell lines. The cell proliferation, viability, caspase−3/7 activity and apoptotic morphology were monitored by spectrophotometry, fluorimetry and fluorescence microscopy. The combined effect of EGFR TKIs, or cetuximab and su11274, was evaluated using a combination index. The results showed that the cell lines that were relatively resistant to EGFR TKIs, especially the H1975 cell line containing the resistance T790M mutation, were found to be more sensitive to EGFR-specific-siRNA. The combination of EGFR siRNA plus c-MET siRNA enhanced cell growth inhibition, apoptosis induction and inhibition of downstream signaling in EGFR TKI resistant H358, H1650 and H1975 cells, despite the absence of activity of the c-MET siRNA alone. EGFR TKIs or cetuximab plus su11274 were also consistently superior to either agent alone. The strongest biological effect was observed when afatinib, an irreversible pan-HER blocker was combined with su11274, which achieved a synergistic effect in the T790M mutant H1975 cells. In a conclusion, our findings offer preclinical proof of principle for combined inhibition as a promising treatment strategy for NSCLC, especially for patients in whom current EGFR-targeted treatments fail due to the presence of the T790M-EGFR-mutation or high c-MET expression.
TL;DR: Clinical efficacy of afatinib has been extensively studied in the LUX-Lung study program and these trials showed promising efficacy in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC or enriched for clinical benefit from EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors gefitinib or erlotinib.
TL;DR: The approval of Boehringer Ingelheim's anticancer drug afatinib highlights the growing enthusiasm for once-shunned irreversible kinase inhibitors.
Abstract: The approval of Boehringer Ingelheim's anticancer drug afatinib highlights the growing enthusiasm for once-shunned irreversible kinase inhibitors.
TL;DR: Results indicate that co-targeting of the erbB (HER) family and IGF-IR, with a combination of afatinib and NVP-AEW541, is superior to treatment with a single agent and encourages further investigation in vivo on their therapeutic potential in IGF- IR and HER positive pancreatic cancers.
Abstract: Aberrant expression and activation of the IGF-IR have been reported in a variety of human cancers and have been associated with resistance to HER targeted therapy. In this study, we investigated the effect of simultaneous targeting of IGF-IR and HER (erbB) family, with NVP-AEW541 and afatinib, on proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells. The sensitivity of a panel of human pancreatic cancer cell lines to treatment with NVP-AEW541 used alone or in combination with afatinib, anti-EGFR antibody ICR62, and cytotoxic agents was determined using the Sulforhodamine B colorimetric assay. Growth factor receptor expression, cell-cycle distribution and cell signalling were determined using flow cytometry and western blot analysis. All pancreatic cancer cell lines were found to be IGF-IR positive and NVP-AEW541 treatment inhibited the growth of the pancreatic cancer cell lines with IC50 values ranging from 342 nM (FA6) to 2.73 μM (PT45). Interestingly, of the various combinations examined, treatment with a combination of NVP-AEW541 and afatinib was superior in inducing synergistic growth inhibition of the majority of pancreatic cancer cells. Our results indicate that co-targeting of the erbB (HER) family and IGF-IR, with a combination of afatinib and NVP-AEW541, is superior to treatment with a single agent and encourages further investigation in vivo on their therapeutic potential in IGF-IR and HER positive pancreatic cancers.