scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Elena Nikiphorou published in 2020"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This anniversary article of 43 research‐performing authors from all around the globe in the official journal of the European Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation e.V. summarizes the evidence of the intense HS clinical and experimental research during the last 15 years in all aspects of the disease.
Abstract: The 14 authors of the first review article on hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) pathogenesis published 2008 in EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY cumulating from the 1st International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Research Symposium held March 30-April 2, 2006 in Dessau, Germany with 33 participants were prophetic when they wrote "Hopefully, this heralds a welcome new tradition: to get to the molecular heart of HS pathogenesis, which can only be achieved by a renaissance of solid basic HS research, as the key to developing more effective HS therapy." (Kurzen et al. What causes hidradenitis suppurativa? Exp Dermatol 2008;17:455). Fifteen years later, there is no doubt that the desired renaissance of solid basic HS research is progressing with rapid steps and that HS has developed deep roots among inflammatory diseases in Dermatology and beyond, recognized as "the only inflammatory skin disease than can be healed". This anniversary article of 43 research-performing authors from all around the globe in the official journal of the European Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation e.V. (EHSF e.V.) and the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation, Inc (HSF USA) summarizes the evidence of the intense HS clinical and experimental research during the last 15 years in all aspects of the disease and provides information of the developments to come in the near future.

71 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
24 Mar 2020-Heart
TL;DR: In this article, the burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) at and prior to diagnosis in people with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and subsequent CVD in these patients was assessed.
Abstract: Objective To assess the burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) at and prior to diagnosis in people with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and subsequent CVD in these patients. Methods A retrospective case–control study using a large English primary care database. People with RA (n=6591) diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 (inclusive) were identified using a validated algorithm, matched 1:1 by age and gender to those without RA (n=6591) and followed for a median of 5.4 years. We assessed differences in CVD at, before and after diagnosis, and the impact of traditional and RA-related risk factors (C reactive protein, RA-related autoantibodies and medication use) on incident CVD (a composite of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke or heart failure). Results RA cases and their matched controls were both of mean age 58.7 (SD 15.5) at cohort entry, and 67.5% were female. Some CVD risk factors were more common at RA diagnosis including smoking and diabetes; however, total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were lower in patients with RA. CVD was more common in RA at cohort entry; stroke (3.9% vs 2.7%, p Conclusions An excess of stroke and heart failure occurs before diagnosis of RA. There is excess risk for further cardiovascular events after diagnosis, which is not explained by differences in traditional CVD or RA-related risk factors at diagnosis.

38 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: There is an excess burden of comorbidity at diagnosis of RA including COPD, asthma and interstitial lung disease, and COPD is a major predictor of early mortality in early RA.
Abstract: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. OBJECTIVES: We assessed comorbidity burden in people with RA at diagnosis and early disease (3 years) and its association with early mortality and joint destruction. The association between lung disease and mortality in RA is not well studied; we also explored this relationship. METHODS: From a contemporary UK-based population (n = 1, 475 762) we identified a cohort with incident RA (n = 6591). The prevalence of comorbidities at diagnosis of RA and at 3 years was compared with age- and gender-matched controls (n = 6591). In individuals with RA we assessed the prognostic value of the Charlson Comorbidity Index and Rheumatic Disease Comorbidity Index calculated at diagnosis for all-cause mortality and joint destruction (with joint surgery as a surrogate marker). We separately evaluated the association between individual lung diseases [chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma and interstitial lung disease] and mortality. RESULTS: Respiratory disease, cardiovascular disease, stroke, diabetes, previous fracture and depression were more common (P < 0.05) in patients with RA at diagnosis than controls. Comorbidity (assessed using RDCI) was associated with all-cause mortality in RA [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.26, 95% CI 1.00-1.60]. There was no association with joint destruction. COPD, but not asthma, was associated with mortality (COPD HR 2.84, 95% CI 1.13-7.12). CONCLUSION: There is an excess burden of comorbidity at diagnosis of RA including COPD, asthma and interstitial lung disease. COPD is a major predictor of early mortality in early RA. Early assessment of comorbidity including lung disease should form part of the routine management of RA patients.

30 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Patients considered that using an app could help them to self-manage their RMD condition if it was tailored to their needs and co-developed with health professionals.
Abstract: Background: Despite the growing interest and exponential popularity of mobile health (mHealth) apps for long-term conditions such as rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) and their self-management, patients are rarely directly consulted and involved in the app development process. Objective: This study aims to explore the needs, experiences, and views of people diagnosed with RMDs on mHealth apps. Methods: The study used a mixed methods approach: (1) an initial qualitative phase via a patient focus group in the UK and (2) a survey disseminated through national organizations for patients with RMDs across European countries, the United States, Canada, and Australia. Results: The focus group included six patients with life-long musculoskeletal conditions. Half had used a self-management app at least once. The use of existing apps was reported as time-consuming due to a lack of functionality. The need for bespoke apps was voiced by all participants. Among 424 patients across European countries, the United States, Canada, and Australia, the main age group was 45 to 54 years (122/424, 28.7%), and 86.8% (368/424) were women. Half of the respondents were aware of the existence of apps to support self-management of their RMDs (188/355, 53%), with 42% (79/188) of them currently using such devices. Patients were mostly interested in an app to self-monitor their health parameters (259/346, 74.9%) and disease activity (221/346, 63.9%) or communicate directly with their health care provider (200/346, 57.8%). Conclusions: Patients considered that using an app could help them to self-manage their RMD condition if it was tailored to their needs and co-developed with health professionals. The development of such apps will require standardization and regular quality control.

28 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The present narrative review uses evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses as well as controlled trials to synthesize the current state-of-the-art on the potential effects of aerobic and resistance exercise on CVD risk factors aswell as on cardiac and vascular function and structure in people with RA.
Abstract: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality is highly prevalent in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with debilitating effects for the individual as well as significant healthcare impact. Current evidence demonstrates that engaging in aerobic and resistance exercise (i.e. structured physical activity) can significantly improve patient-reported and clinical index-assessed outcomes in RA. In addition to this, engagement in exercise programmes improves, in a dose-dependent manner, the risk of developing CVD as well as CVD symptoms and outcomes. The present narrative review uses evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses as well as controlled trials, to synthesize the current state-of-the-art on the potential effects of aerobic and resistance exercise on CVD risk factors as well as on cardiac and vascular function and structure in people with RA. Where there is a lack of evidence in RA to explain potential mechanisms, relevant studies from the general population are also discussed and linked to RA.

25 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The clinical, epidemiologic, serologic and histopathologic characteristics, as well as the imaging techniques used for their diagnosis and the therapeutic options and treatment outcomes are discussed.

24 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Evidence and expert opinion informed a set of recommendations providing guidance on the generic core competences of HPRs, with specific reference to nurses, physical therapists (PTs) and occupational therapists (OTs) to serve as a basis for their postgraduate education.
Abstract: Background/objectives To maintain and optimise the quality of care provided by health professionals in rheumatology (HPRs), adequate educational offerings are needed. This task force (TF) aimed to develop evidence-based recommendations for the generic core competences of HPRs, with specific reference to nurses, physical therapists (PTs) and occupational therapists (OTs) to serve as a basis for their postgraduate education. Methods The EULAR standardised operating procedures for the development of recommendations were followed. A TF including rheumatologists, nurses, PTs, OTs, patient-representatives, an educationalist, methodologists and researchers from 12 countries met twice. In the first TF meeting, 13 research questions were defined to support a systematic literature review (SLR). In the second meeting, the SLR evidence was discussed and recommendations formulated. Subsequently, level of evidence and strength of recommendation were assigned and level of agreement (LoA) determined (0–10 rating scale). Results Three overarching principles were identified and 10 recommendations were developed for the generic core competences of HPRs. The SLR included 79 full-text papers, 20 of which addressed the competences, knowledge, skills, attitudes and/or educational needs of HPRs from multiple professions. The average LoA for each recommendation ranged from 9.42 to 9.79. Consensus was reached both on a research and educational agenda. Conclusion Evidence and expert opinion informed a set of recommendations providing guidance on the generic core competences of HPRs. Implementation of these recommendations in the postgraduate education of HPRs at the international and national level is advised, considering variation in healthcare systems and professional roles.

23 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The current evidence for the underlying pathogenic mechanisms linking inflammation with CVD in the context of RA is reviewed and the possible impact of treatments used in RA is reflected.
Abstract: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune inflammatory arthritis. Inflammation, however, can spread beyond the joints to involve other organs. During the past few years, it has been well recognized that RA associates with increased risk for cardiovascular (CV) disease (CVD) compared with the general population. This seems to be due not only to the increased occurrence in RA of classical CVD risk factors and comorbidities like smoking, obesity, hypertension, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and others but also to the inflammatory burden that RA itself carries. This is not unexpected given the strong links between inflammation and atherosclerosis and CVD. It has been shown that inflammatory cytokines which are present in abundance in RA play a significant role in every step of plaque formation and rupture. Most of the therapeutic regimes used in RA treatment seem to offer significant benefits to that end. However, more studies are needed to clarify the effect of these drugs on various parameters, including the lipid profile. Of note, although pharmacological intervention significantly helps reduce the inflammatory burden and therefore the CVD risk, control of the so-called classical risk factors is equally important. Herein, we review the current evidence for the underlying pathogenic mechanisms linking inflammation with CVD in the context of RA and reflect on the possible impact of treatments used in RA.

21 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Recent cohorts indicate improved levels of disease activity and physical quality of life, however this has not translated into similar improvements in levels of pain, fatigue and functional disability by 60-months.

20 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: At diagnosis, anaemia and lymphopenia, but not neutropenia, increase the risk of common infections in individuals with RA, and data support the effectiveness of the influenza vaccination in Individuals with RA.
Abstract: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. OBJECTIVES: To describe the prevalence of haematological abnormalities in individuals with RA at the point of diagnosis in primary care and the associations between haematological abnormalities, vaccinations and subsequent risk of common infections. METHODS: We studied 6591 individuals with newly diagnosed RA between 2004 and 2016 inclusive using the UK Royal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre primary care database. The prevalence of haematological abnormalities at diagnosis (anaemia, neutropenia and lymphopenia) was established. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association between each haematological abnormality and time to common infections and the influence of vaccination status (influenza and pneumococcal vaccine) on time to common infections in individuals with RA compared with a matched cohort of individuals without RA. RESULTS: Anaemia was common at RA diagnosis (16.1% of individuals), with neutropenia (0.6%) and lymphopenia (1.4%) less so. Lymphopenia and anaemia were associated with increased infection risk [hazard ratio (HR) 1.18 (95% CI 1.08, 1.29) and HR 1.37 (95% CI 1.08, 1.73), respectively]. There was no evidence of an association between neutropenia and infection risk [HR 0.94 (95% CI 0.60, 1.47)]. Pneumonia was much more common in individuals with early RA compared with controls. Influenza vaccination was associated with reduced risk of influenza-like illness only for individuals with RA [HR 0.58 (95% CI 0.37, 0.90)]. CONCLUSION: At diagnosis, anaemia and lymphopenia, but not neutropenia, increase the risk of common infections in individuals with RA. Our data support the effectiveness of the influenza vaccination in individuals with RA.

17 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The impact of axSpA on work outcomes is considerable and necessitates optimal intervention, including suppression of disease activity, to enhance people’s chances of remaining in work.
Abstract: Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that typically affects people of working age. Work-related outcomes are therefore important to study, both from an individual but also a societal perspective. Through this review of the literature, we explore the impact of axSpA on key work outcomes including work and productivity loss and predictors for these. Recent evidence confirms that axSpA is associated with substantial consequences on the ability to work. Reassuringly, early treatment and use of biologics have been associated with improved wok outcomes highlighting the importance of prompt diagnosis and management. High disease activity, labour-intensive jobs, poor physical function and impaired spinal mobility are among identified predictors of adverse work outcomes in axSpA. The impact of axSpA on work outcomes is considerable and necessitates optimal intervention, including suppression of disease activity, to enhance people’s chances of remaining in work.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Beverages have a key role within the mosaic of autoimmunity in RA and potential to alter the microbiome, leading to downstream effects on inflammatory pathways, and how this growing body of evidence may be harnessed by the multidisciplinary team in patient management.
Abstract: Background: The role of nutrition in the pathogenesis of rheumatic diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), has gained increasing attention in recent years. A growing number of studies have focussed on the diverse nutritional contents of beverages, and their possible role in the development and progression of RA. Main body: We aimed to summarise the current knowledge on the role of a range of beverages in the context of RA. Beverages have a key role within the mosaic of autoimmunity in RA and potential to alter the microbiome, leading to downstream effects on inflammatory pathways. The molecular contents of beverages, including coffee, tea, and wine, have similarly been found to interfere with immune signalling pathways, some beneficial for disease progression and others less so. Finally, we consider beverages in the context of wider dietary patterns, and how this growing body of evidence may be harnessed by the multidisciplinary team in patient management. Conclusions: While there is increasing work focussing on the role of beverages in RA, integration of discussions around diet and lifestyle in our management of patients remains sparse. Nutrition in RA remains a controversial topic, but future studies, especially on the role of beverages, are likely to shed further light on this in coming years.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Findings from routine care support ACR/EULAR guidelines that remission is a preferable goal over low disease activity in early RA.
Abstract: OBJECTIVES To examine associations between function, quality of life and structural outcomes in patients achieving remission vs low disease activity in early RA. METHODS Demographic, clinical and radiographic variables were collected at baseline and then annually from the Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Study (ERAS) and Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Network (ERAN) inception cohorts in routine care from 1986 to 2012. Disease activity was categorized: mean DAS28 score between years 1 and 5: remission [mean remission DAS (mRDAS) <2.6] or low [mean low DAS (mLDAS) 2.6-3.2]; sustained low/remission DAS28 (sLDAS/sRDAS) at years 1 and 2; and sustained Boolean remission (sBR) at years 1 and 2. Changes in HAQ and Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire [SF-36; physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component score]) and total Sharp van der Heijde (SvdH) scores for each disease activity category were modelled using multi-level models. Covariates included year of onset, age, gender and DMARD use at first visit. RESULTS Of 2701 patients, 562 (21%) were categorized mRDAS, 330 (12%) mLDAS, 279 (10%) sRDAS, 203 (7.5%) sLDAS and 93 (3%) sBR. Patients categorized as mRDAS had increasingly divergent improved HAQ, SF-36 PCS, MCS and total SvdH scores compared with mLDAS (P-values 0.001 to <0.0001, all time points). Patients categorized as sRDAS had better HAQ, SF-36 PCS and MCS scores (P-values 0.05 to <0.0001, all time points) and SvdH scores (P = 0.05, years 3-5) over sLDAS. sBR was associated with better HAQ, and SF-36 PCS and MCS scores over sLDAS (P-values 0.002 to <0.0001, all time points). CONCLUSION These findings from routine care support ACR/EULAR guidelines that remission is a preferable goal over low disease activity in early RA.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: To investigate the relationship between smoking and imaging outcomes over 5 years in axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) and to assess whether socioeconomic factors influence these relationships.
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the relationship between smoking and imaging outcomes over 5 years in axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) and to assess whether socioeconomic factors influence these relationships Methods: Axial SpA patients from the Devenir des Spondylarthropathies Indiffererenciees Recentes cohort were included The following 4 imaging outcomes were assessed by 3 central readers at baseline, 2 years, and 5 years: spine radiographs (using the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score [mSASSS]), sacroiliac (SI) joint radiographs (using the modified New York criteria), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the spine (using the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada [SPARCC] score), and MRI of the SI joint (using the SPARCC score) The explanatory variable of interest was smoking status at baseline Interactions between smoking and socioeconomic factors (ie, job type [blue-collar or manual work versus white-collar or nonmanual work] and education [low versus high]) were first tested, and if significant, analyses were run using separate strata Generalized estimating equations models were used, with adjustments for confounders Results: In total, 406 axial SpA patients were included (52% male, 40% smokers, and 18% blue collar) Smoking was independently associated with more MRI-detected SI joint inflammation at each visit over the 5 years, an effect that was seen only in patients with blue-collar professions (β = 541 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 135, 948]) and in patients with low education levels (β = 265 [95% CI 042,488]), using separate models Smoking was also significantly associated with spinal inflammation (β = 169 [95% CI 045, 293]) and SI joint damage (β = 057 [95% CI 018, 096]) across all patients, irrespective of socioeconomic factors and other potential confounders Conclusion: Strong associations were found between smoking at baseline and MRI-detected SI joint inflammation at each visit over a time period of 5 years in axial SpA patients with a blue-collar job or low education level These findings suggest a possible role for mechanical stress amplifying the effect of smoking on axial inflammation in axial SpA

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The aim of this article is to raise the awareness of this underrecognized clinicoradiological condition and to enable the health-care providers to recognize clinical and radiological features that should raise suspicion of the osteitis condensans illi, and to describe the treatment options.
Abstract: Osteitis condensans ilii is a noninflammatory condition of an uncertain etiology, characterized by sclerotic bone lesions located mainly in the iliac region of the sacroiliac joints. In many patients, osteitis condensans ilii remains an incidental imaging finding; however, it has been associated with lower back pain and may mimic inflammatory rheumatic conditions such as axial spondyloarthritis. The diagnosis is based on the presence of the characteristic sclerotic lesions on radiographs and the exclusion of other conditions that are associated with back pain. Management is usually conservative with the use of physical therapy and analgesics, and it is associated with a favorable prognosis. Herein, we conducted a narrative literature review using the terms osteitis condensans ilii, and we identified case reports, case series, reviews, and original studies associated with the condition. The aim of this article is to raise the awareness of this underrecognized clinicoradiological condition and to enable the health-care providers to recognize clinical and radiological features that should raise suspicion of the osteitis condensans illi, and to describe the treatment options.

Journal ArticleDOI
10 Mar 2020
TL;DR: The currently available evidence is not in the phase of putting diet on the same level as pharmacological treatment in RMDs and in particular, RA, but future studies will likely shed additional light on this controversial topic and at least might suggest a value as dietary prevention of risk factors.
Abstract: The relationship between food and health is known since the antiquity and in the field of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs), mainly rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a large number of studies has been published over the last 50 years encompassing different aspects of nutrition. This led to postulate a role of nutrients for both primary prevention of RMDs in the general population and secondary prevention of disease flares and complications in patients with an established RMD. We aimed to summarise and critically discuss current evidence on the role of different nutrients and dietary regimens in RMDs with a focus on RA. Over the last years, some seminal papers proved that some compounds, such as salt, can directly modulate the immune system and large epidemiological studies have been linking dietary patters with the risk to develop RMDs. However, physicians’ knowledge about the role of diet in disease prevention and treatment is often poor and ultimately diet is rarely perceived as a companion of pharmacological treatment. Based on the currently available evidence, we are not (yet?) in the phase of putting diet on the same level as pharmacological treatment in RMDs and in particular, RA, but future studies will likely shed additional light on this controversial topic and at least might suggest a value as dietary prevention of risk factors.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Improvements in inflammatory markers over time in early RA have not translated into similar improvements in patient-reported outcomes relating to either physical or mental health, in line with improved treatment strategies.
Abstract: © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The TITRATE trial shows that intensive management incorporating psychosocial support delivered by specially trained healthcare professions is effective in moderately active established RA.

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Feb 2020-RMD Open
TL;DR: The EMEUNET post-doc mentoring programme addresses unmet need for mentoring, is viable and appreciated by mentors and mentees, and is transferable to other fields where there is need for academic career mentoring.
Abstract: Objective This study aims to (1) assess the perceived need for a postdoctoral (post-doc) mentoring programme in rheumatology, (2) describe the characteristics and organisational aspects of a pilot mentoring programme implemented by the EMerging European League Against Rheumatism NETwork (EMEUNET) and (3) report mentors’ and mentees’ evaluation of the pilot programme. Methods An online survey was conducted among young researchers in rheumatology to evaluate the need and preferred characteristics of a post-doc mentoring initiative. Informed by the survey, a pilot programme was designed and launched. The pilot programme was evaluated with 3-month, 6-moth and 12-month surveys and interviews with mentees and a 12-month survey among mentors, after completion. Results From 275 responses (43 countries, 86% from Europe) collected, analyses were restricted to the target population (total population=158; post-docs (n=103 (65%)) and PhD students (n=55 (35%))). There was a clear need (99% positive responses) for a post-doc mentoring programme. Discussions about current and new projects, and how to lead projects were ranked as priorities in post-doc mentoring. The most desired mentor attribute was generosity and interest in helping (86%), followed by research experience (68%) and having a well-established network (66%). The pilot programme included four mentees (through competitive application) allocated to three mentors. Evaluation surveys and interviews revealed that the programme organisation and content were well appreciated by mentees and mentors. Conclusions The EMEUNET post-doc mentoring programme addresses unmet need for mentoring, is viable and appreciated by mentors and mentees. The programme structure and content are transferable to other fields where there is need for academic career mentoring.


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The clinical, personal and societal impact imposed by rheumatoid arthritis has transformed in the last decade, driven largely by a substantially revised treatment paradigm, comprising earlier diagnosis, treatment and application of treat-to-target strategies, together with the advent of selective immune-targeted therapeutics based upon pathogenesis driven principles.
Abstract: The clinical, personal and societal impact imposed by rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has transformed in the last decade. The likelihood is increasing of a more favourable disease course, associated with less articular damage and better long-term prognosis in RA (1, 2). This has been driven largely by a substantially revised treatment paradigm, comprising earlier diagnosis, treatment and application of treat-to-target strategies, together with the advent of selective immune-targeted therapeutics based upon pathogenesis driven principles.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results of the survey will inform the development of task force policy proposals for interventions to support career advancement among EULAR and EMEUNET members and the identified interventions have potential to support Career advancement of all rheumatologists, health professionals and non-clinical scientists regardless of gender.
Abstract: Background: Women represent an increasing proportion of the overall rheumatology workforce, but are underrepresented in academic rheumatology, especially in leadership roles [1]. Objectives: The EULAR Task Force on Gender Equity in Academic Rheumatology has been convened to establish the extent of the unmet need for support of female rheumatologists, health professionals and non-clinical scientists in academic rheumatology and develop a framework to address this through EULAR and EMEUNET. Methods: To investigate gender equity in academic rheumatology, an anonymous web-based survey was targeted at the membership of EULAR and Emerging EULAR Network (EMEUNET) and their wider networks. The survey was developed based on a narrative literature review [1], best practice from The Association of Women in Rheumatology, a survey of task force members and face-to-face task force discussions. Personal experiences were explored and 24 potential interventions to aid career advancement were ranked. Statistics were descriptive with significance testing for male/female responses compared using chi-squared/t-tests. The level of significance was set at p Results: A total of 301 respondents from 24 countries fully completed the survey. By profession, 290 (86.4%) were rheumatologists, 19 (6.3%) health professionals, and 22 (7.3%) non-clinical scientists. By gender, 217 (72.1%) were women, 83 (27.6%) men, and 1 (0.3%) third gender. By age, 203 (67.5%) were 40 or under. By ethnicity, 30 (10.0%) identified themselves as ethnic minority. A high proportion of respondents reported having experienced gender discrimination (47.2% total: 58.1% for women and 18.1% for men) and sexual harassment (26.2%: 31.8% and 10.8% respectively) (Figure 1). Chi-squared tests on the numbers on which these proportions were based showed statistically significant differences between women and men in having experienced gender discrimination (Χ2=36.959 (df=1), p Conclusion: The results of the survey will inform the development of task force policy proposals for interventions to support career advancement among EULAR and EMEUNET members. The identified interventions have potential to support career advancement of all rheumatologists, health professionals and non-clinical scientists regardless of gender. References: [1]Andreoli L, Ovseiko PV, Hassan N, Kiltz U, van Mens L, Gossec L, et al. Gender equity in clinical practice, research and training: Where do we stand in rheumatology? Joint, Bone, Spine: Revue du Rhumatisme. 2019;86(6):669-672. Acknowledgments: We gratefully acknowledge the rheumatologists, health professionals and non-clinical scientists who responded to the survey. Disclosure of Interests: Pavel V Ovseiko: None declared, Laure Gossec Grant/research support from: Lilly, Mylan, Pfizer, Sandoz, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB, Laura Andreoli: None declared, Uta Kiltz Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Novartis, Pfizer, Consultant of: AbbVie, Biocad, Eli Lilly and Company, Grunenthal, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Leonieke van Mens: None declared, Neelam Hassan: None declared, Marike van der Leeden: None declared, Heidi J Siddle: None declared, Alessia Alunno: None declared, Iain McInnes Grant/research support from: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Nemanja Damjanov Grant/research support from: from AbbVie, Pfizer, and Roche, Consultant of: AbbVie, Gedeon Richter, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Gedeon Richter, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche, Florence Apparailly: None declared, Caroline Ospelt Consultant of: Consultancy fees from Gilead Sciences., Irene van der Horst-Bruinsma Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Consultant of: AbbVie, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Elena Nikiphorou: None declared, Katie Druce Speakers bureau: Pfizer and Lilly, Zoltan Szekanecz Grant/research support from: Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: Sanofi, MSD, Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Novertis, Lilly, Gedeon Richter, Amgen, Alexandre Sepriano: None declared, Tadej Avcin: None declared, George Bertsias Grant/research support from: GSK, Consultant of: Novartis, Georg Schett Speakers bureau: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Roche and UCB, Anne Maree Keenan: None declared, Laura C Coates: None declared

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Sep 2020-RMD Open
TL;DR: This collaborative initiative highlighted wishes from young specialists for developing regular local multidisciplinary meetings to discuss complex patients, clinical research collaboration with combined grants andMultidisciplinary online projects such as common courses, webinars and apps.
Abstract: Background Multidisciplinary collaboration is defined as a collective work involving multiple disciplines and is common in clinical care and research. Our aim was to describe current clinical and research collaboration among young specialists and to identify unmet needs in this area. Methods An online survey was disseminated by email and social media to members of the EMerging EUlar NETwork, the Young Nephrologists’ Platform, the Paediatric Rheumatology European Society Emerging Rheumatologists and Researchers and the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Junior Members. Results Of 303 respondents from 36 countries, 61% were female, 21% were aged below 30 years and 67% were aged 31–40 years. Young rheumatologists were the most represented (39%), followed by young nephrologists (24%), young paediatricians (20%), young allergologists (11%) then young internists (3%) and 3% other specialities. Collaborations were reported frequently by phone and email, also by various combined clinics while common local multidisciplinary meetings were uncommon. 96% would like to develop clinical research collaborations and 69% basic research collaborations. The majority of young specialists would be interested in online (84%) and/or 1–2 days (85%) common courses including case discussion (81%) and training workshops (85%), as well as webinars recorded with several specialists on a specific disease (96%). Conclusions This collaborative initiative highlighted wishes from young specialists for developing (1) regular local multidisciplinary meetings to discuss complex patients, (2) clinical research collaboration with combined grants and (3) multidisciplinary online projects such as common courses, webinars and apps.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Health care professionals should consider Libman Sacks endocarditis diagnosis in patients with underlying SLE and should be aware of the risk of embolisation.
Abstract: Background: In clinical training, a portfolio is expected to stimulate learning and encourage critical reflection. Some, but not all, European countries use a portfolio in rheumatology training, and their scope varies widely. A EULAR portfolio for Rheumatology trainees could contribute to improve overall training, raise educational standards, foster the setting of common goals and harmonize rheumatology training across countries. Objectives: Develop key components that should be included in a EULAR portfolio of Rheumatology. Methods: A working group (WG) composed of 9 rheumatologists and 1 educationalist was established. A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted in November 2018, according to the PIM structure: Population: trainees; Instrument of interest: portfolio; Measurement of properties of interest: content portfolio. A survey was disseminated among the WG group and WG members of the EMerging EUlar NETwork (EMEUNET), inquiring about the content and structure of existing national portfolios. Portfolio materials of selected countries were reviewed. Last, the WG elected the key components of the portfolio. Results: 13/2,034 articles were included in the SLR (12 high/1 moderate risk of bias). Information on direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) (9/13), personal reflections (8/13), learning goals (5/13) and multisource feedback (5/13) were most often included in the portfolio. Twenty-five respondents filled out the survey (response rate ≈ 50%). Reflective writing (n=7), learning goals (n=4) and feedback (n=4) were considered the most useful components of a portfolio. About half indicated that a portfolio was a bureaucratic burden; 4 respondents mentioned lack of feedback by supervisors as a barrier. Portfolio materials of 7 European countries were reviewed. Several portfolios (Germany, Italy, Greece and Spain) were logbooks, i.e. a record of clinical activities. Other portfolios (UK, Denmark, The Netherlands) also included information on workplace-based assessments, learning goals, and personal reflections. The proposed key components of the portfolio are included in Table 1. Conclusion: This initiative resulted in the establishment of a list of key components to be included in a EULAR portfolio of Rheumatology. Assessment forms for each key portfolio component are currently being developed. Portfolio implementation, particularly in countries that do not use it yet, may contribute significantly to promote a higher standard of patient care across Europe. Disclosure of Interests: Marloes van Onna: None declared, Sofia Ramiro Grant/research support from: MSD, Consultant of: Abbvie, Lilly, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, Speakers bureau: Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Catherine Haines: None declared, M. Holland-Fischer: None declared, Jose Antonio P. da Silva Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Abbvie, Consultant of: Pfizer, AbbVie, Roche, Lilly, Novartis, Jean Dudler: None declared, Christopher Edwards Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Biogen, Roche, Consultant of: Abbvie, Samsung, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, BMS, Biogen, Celgene, Fresenius, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Mundipharma, Pfizer, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Samsung, Sanofi, UCB, Alessia Alunno: None declared, Elena Nikiphorou: None declared, L. Falzon: None declared, Francisca Sivera: None declared

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The longer the length of painful period before diagnosis was related to a higher probability of obtaining a negative result on the biopsy, which could be explained by a greater aggressiveness of pyogenic organisms that perhaps congregate in the lesser time span instead of non-pyogenic agents, that could deliver in more silent infection.
Abstract: Background: Intra-articular therapies (IAT) are widely used in clinical practice to treat patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs). Many factors influence their efficacy and safety. There is a wide variation in the way IATs are delivered by health professionals. In an attempt to standardise these procedures, evidence-based recommendations are the right way forward. Objectives: To establish evidence-based recommendations to guide health professionals using IAT in adult patients with peripheral arthropathies. Methods: At a first face-to-face meeting, the results of an overview of systematic reviews were presented to the multidisciplinary task force of members from 8 countries. The aim, scope and outline of the taskforce were also established at this meeting. Thirty-two clinical questions ranked for priority (relevance for practice plus feasibility) drove the systematic reviews performed by two fellows. In addition, two surveys addressed to physicians, health professionals and patients throughout Europe were agreed to acquire more background information. At the second face-to-face meeting, the evidence for each research question was discussed, and each recommendation shaped and voted in a first Delphi round. Level of agreement was numerically scored 0 to 10 (0 completely disagree, 10 completely agree). All panellists voted anonymously using a sli.do app. Agreement needed to be greater than 80% to be included in a second Delphi round, which also allowed reformulation of statements. Finally, a third Delphi round was sent to the taskforce. The level of evidence was assigned to each recommendation according to the EULAR SOP for establishing recommendations. Results: Recommendations focus on practical aspects for daily practice to guide health professionals before, during and after IAT in adult patients with peripheral arthropathies. Five overarching principles were established, together with 11 recommendations that address the following issues: (1) patient information; (2) procedure and setting; (3) accuracy issues; (3) routine and special antiseptic care; (4) safety issues and precautions to be addressed in special populations; (5) efficacy and safety of repeated joint injections; (6) the usage of local anaesthetics; and (7) aftercare. The document includes the supporting evidence and results from the surveys, level of evidence and agreement. Conclusion: We have developed the first evidence and expert opinion based recommendations to guide health professionals using IAT. Acknowledgments: Eular Taskforce grant CL109 Disclosure of Interests: Jacqueline Uson Jaeger: None declared, Esperanza Naredo: None declared, Sebastian C Rodriguez-Garcia Speakers bureau: Novartis Farmaceutica, S.A., Merck Sharp & Dohme Espana, S.A., Sanofi Aventis, UCB Pharma, Raul Castellanos-Moreira: None declared, Terence O’Neill: None declared, Hemant Pandit Grant/research support from: Glaxo Smith Kline (GSK) for work on Diclofenac Gel, Speakers bureau: Bristol Myers Squibb for teaching their employees about hip and knee replacement, Michael Doherty Grant/research support from: AstraZeneca funded the Nottingham Sons of Gout study, Consultant of: Advisory borads on gout for Grunenthal and Mallinckrodt, Mikael Boesen Consultant of: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Esaote, Glenmark, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Paid instructor for: IAG, Image Analysis Group, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, esaote, Glenmark, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB (scientific advisor)., Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly, Esaote, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Ingrid Moller: None declared, Valentina Vardanyan: None declared, Jenny de la Torre-Aboki: None declared, Lene Terslev: None declared, Francis Berenbaum Grant/research support from: TRB Chemedica (through institution), MSD (through institution), Pfizer (through institution), Consultant of: Novartis, MSD, Pfizer, Lilly, UCB, Abbvie, Roche, Servier, Sanofi-Aventis, Flexion Therapeutics, Expanscience, GSK, Biogen, Nordic, Sandoz, Regeneron, Gilead, Bone Therapeutics, Regulaxis, Peptinov, 4P Pharma, Paid instructor for: Sandoz, Speakers bureau: Novartis, MSD, Pfizer, Lilly, UCB, Abbvie, Roche, Servier, Sanofi-Aventis, Flexion Therapeutics, Expanscience, GSK, Biogen, Nordic, Sandoz, Regeneron, Gilead, Sandoz, Maria Antonietta D’Agostino Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Novartis, and Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, BMS, Novartis, and Roche, Willm Uwe Kampen: None declared, Elena Nikiphorou: None declared, IRENE Pitsillidou: None declared, Loreto Carmona Grant/research support from: Novartis Farmaceutica, SA, Pfizer, S.L.U., Merck Sharp & Dohme Espana, S.A., Roche Farma, S.A, Sanofi Aventis, AbbVie Spain, S.L.U., and Laboratorios Gebro Pharma, SA (All trhough institution)