scispace - formally typeset
J

Jason D. Ferrell

Researcher at Concordia University

Publications -  12
Citations -  511

Jason D. Ferrell is an academic researcher from Concordia University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Relativism & Pluralism (political theory). The author has an hindex of 6, co-authored 12 publications receiving 418 citations. Previous affiliations of Jason D. Ferrell include St. Edward's University & University of Texas at Austin.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Justify your alpha

Daniel Lakens, +98 more
TL;DR: In response to recommendations to redefine statistical significance to P ≤ 0.005, it is proposed that researchers should transparently report and justify all choices they make when designing a study, including the alpha level.
Journal ArticleDOI

Daily online testing in large classes: boosting college performance while reducing achievement gaps.

TL;DR: It is suggested that frequent consequential quizzing should be used routinely in large lecture courses to improve performance in class and in other concurrent and subsequent courses.
Journal ArticleDOI

Looking under the hood: The psychogenic motivational foundations of the Dark Triad☆☆☆

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present four studies with two measures of the Dark Triad traits, in two volunteer, one mTurk, and one American undergraduate sample using three frameworks of individual differences in psychogenic motives (i.e., achievement, power, and, affiliation).
Journal ArticleDOI

The alleged relativism of Isaiah Berlin

TL;DR: The authors argue that such criticisms are misplaced, as they fail to account for Berlin's views about a common human horizon and the sense of reality, which is taken to illuminate the differences and similarities between those of different beliefs.
Journal ArticleDOI

Isaiah Berlin: Liberalism and pluralism in theory and practice

TL;DR: In this article, a reconsideration of Berlin's position is presented, which illuminates certain features of pluralism, as well as exemplifies its compatibility with liberalism, and provides insight into the problem of justification in a pluralist condition.