Institution
University of Chester
Education•Chester, United Kingdom•
About: University of Chester is a education organization based out in Chester, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Mental health. The organization has 1229 authors who have published 2908 publications receiving 45462 citations.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
01 Jun 2021TL;DR: This paper proposed a multilingual variant of T5, mT5, which was pre-trained on a new Common Crawl-based dataset covering 101 languages and achieved state-of-the-art performance on many multilingual benchmarks.
Abstract: The recent “Text-to-Text Transfer Transformer” (T5) leveraged a unified text-to-text format and scale to attain state-of-the-art results on a wide variety of English-language NLP tasks. In this paper, we introduce mT5, a multilingual variant of T5 that was pre-trained on a new Common Crawl-based dataset covering 101 languages. We detail the design and modified training of mT5 and demonstrate its state-of-the-art performance on many multilingual benchmarks. We also describe a simple technique to prevent “accidental translation” in the zero-shot setting, where a generative model chooses to (partially) translate its prediction into the wrong language. All of the code and model checkpoints used in this work are publicly available.
1,016 citations
••
Liverpool John Moores University1, University of Chester2, Max Planck Society3, Oxford Brookes University4, McGill University5, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth6, New York University7, British Academy8, University of Oxford9, University of Lethbridge10, Michigan State University11, Bournemouth University12, Durham University13, University of Stirling14, Instituto Politécnico Nacional15, University of Wisconsin-Madison16, University of Zurich17
TL;DR: In this paper, a new framework for integrating current knowledge on fission-fusion dynamics emerged from a fundamental rethinking of the term fission fusion away from its current general use as a label for a particular modal type of social system.
Abstract: Renewed interest in fission‐fusion dynamics is due to the recognition that such dynamics may create unique challenges for social interaction and distinctive selective pressures acting on underlying communicative and cognitive abilities. New frameworks for integrating current knowledge on fission‐fusion dynamics emerge from a fundamental rethinking of the term “fission‐fusion” away from its current general use as a label for a particular modal type of social system (i.e., “fission‐fusion societies”). Specifically, because the degree of spatial and temporal cohesion of group members varies both within and across taxa, any social system can be described in terms of the extent to which it expresses fission‐fusion dynamics. This perspective has implications for socioecology, communication, cognitive demands, and human social evolution.
816 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors developed and tested the effectiveness of a new and comprehensive set of emotional film excerpts and found that the film clips were effective with regard to several criteria such as emotional discreteness, arousal, positive and negative affect.
Abstract: Using emotional film clips is one of the most popular and effective methods of emotion elicitation. The main goal of the present study was to develop and test the effectiveness of a new and comprehensive set of emotional film excerpts. Fifty film experts were asked to remember specific film scenes that elicited fear, anger, sadness, disgust, amusement, tenderness, as well as emotionally neutral scenes. For each emotion, the 10 most frequently mentioned scenes were selected and cut into film clips. Next, 364 participants viewed the film clips in individual laboratory sessions and rated each film on multiple dimensions. Results showed that the film clips were effective with regard to several criteria such as emotional discreteness, arousal, positive and negative affect. Finally, ranking scores were computed for 24 classification criteria: Subjective arousal, positive and negative affect (derived from the PANAS; Watson & Tellegen, 1988), a positive and a negative affect scores derived from the Differential Emotions Scale (DES; Izard et al., 1974), six emotional discreteness scores (for anger, disgust, sadness, fear, amusement and tenderness), and 15 “mixed feelings” scores assessing the effectiveness of each film excerpt to produce blends of specific emotions. In addition, a number of emotionally neutral film clips were also validated. The database and editing instructions to construct the film clips have been made freely available in a website.
751 citations
••
University of Salford1, University of Salzburg2, Stockholm University3, Natural England4, University of Chester5, University of Manchester6, St. Michael's GAA, Sligo7, University of Tampere8, University of Helsinki9, University of Copenhagen10, Newcastle University11, University of Birmingham12, Edinburgh College of Art13
TL;DR: In this article, an integrated framework for multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research and a catalogue of key research questions in urban green space research are presented, which can contribute to the better understanding of people's relationship with cities.
405 citations
••
Institute of Cancer Research1, Imperial College London2, University of Dundee3, King's College London4, University of Birmingham5, University of Southampton6, University of Manchester7, University of Sheffield8, University of Cambridge9, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust10, Newcastle University11, University of Nottingham12, University of London13, Queen Mary University of London14, University of East Anglia15, University of Glasgow16, University College Dublin17, Cardiff University18, University of Leicester19, University College London20, Brunel University London21, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland22, University of Stirling23, University of Chester24, University of Oxford25, University of Edinburgh26, National Cancer Research Institute27, Queen's University Belfast28, University College Cork29, University of Liverpool30, London Research Institute31, Brighton and Sussex Medical School32, University of Leeds33
TL;DR: With resources to conduct further high-quality targeted research focusing on the gaps identified, increased knowledge translating into improved clinical care should be achievable within five years.
Abstract: Introduction: Breast cancer remains a significant scientific, clinical and societal challenge. This gap analysis has reviewed and critically assessed enduring issues and new challenges emerging from recent research, and proposes strategies for translating solutions into practice. Methods: More than 100 internationally recognised specialist breast cancer scientists, clinicians and healthcare professionals collaborated to address nine thematic areas: genetics, epigenetics and epidemiology; molecular pathology and cell biology; hormonal influences and endocrine therapy; imaging, detection and screening; current/ novel therapies and biomarkers; drug resistance; metastasis, angiogenesis, circulating tumour cells, cancer ‘stem’ cells; risk and prevention; living with and managing breast cancer and its treatment. The groups developed summary papers through an iterative process which, following further appraisal from experts and patients, were melded into this summary account. (Continued on next page)
390 citations
Authors
Showing all 1262 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Tim J. Gabbett | 79 | 302 | 18910 |
Craig E. Banks | 77 | 569 | 27520 |
Michael Jones | 72 | 331 | 18889 |
Jan Skov Pedersen | 70 | 442 | 20179 |
Peter R. Ogilby | 53 | 193 | 9985 |
Gareth R. Williams | 50 | 266 | 8974 |
Steven Jones | 49 | 260 | 8519 |
David A. Lawrence | 48 | 197 | 7805 |
Gary Davies | 42 | 133 | 6192 |
Martin D.D. Evans | 42 | 211 | 7412 |
Grace L. Smith | 42 | 174 | 8785 |
Lynne U. Sneddon | 40 | 104 | 5996 |
Marie H. Murphy | 38 | 182 | 5952 |
Saphwan Al-Assaf | 37 | 112 | 4087 |
Michael J. Boulton | 37 | 86 | 7995 |