scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Manel Sabaté published in 2021"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors report the demographics, angiographic findings, and in-hospital outcomes of COVID-19 patients and compare these with pre-COVID19 cohorts.

59 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The EURO SHOCK trial will determine whether early initiation of VA-ECMO in patients presenting with ACS-CGS persisting after PCI improves mortality and morbidity.
Abstract: Aims Cardiogenic shock (CGS) occurs in 6-10% of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Mortality has fallen over time from 80% to approximately 50% consequent on acute revascularisation but has plateaued since the 1990s. Once established, patients with CGS develop adverse compensatory mechanisms that contribute to the downward spiral towards death, which becomes difficult to reverse. We aimed to test in a robust, prospective, randomised controlled trial whether early support with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) provides clinical benefit by improving mortality and morbidity. Methods and results The EURO SHOCK trial will test the benefit or otherwise of mechanical cardiac support using VA-ECMO, initiated early after acute percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for CGS. The trial sets out to randomise 428 patients with CGS complicating ACS, following primary PCI (P-PCI), to either very early ECMO plus standard pharmacotherapy, or standard pharmacotherapy alone. It will be conducted in 39 European centres. The primary endpoint is 30-day all-cause mortality with key secondary endpoints: 1) 12-month all-cause mortality or admission for heart failure, 2) 12-month all-cause mortality, 3) 12-month admission for heart failure. Cost-effectiveness analysis (including quality of life measures) will be embedded. Mechanistic and hypothesis-generating substudies will be undertaken. Conclusions The EURO SHOCK trial will determine whether early initiation of VA-ECMO in patients presenting with ACS-CGS persisting after PCI improves mortality and morbidity.

56 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The SYNTAX II study as mentioned in this paper evaluated the impact of advances in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), integrated into a single revascularization strategy, on outcomes of patients with de novo three-vessel disease.
Abstract: Aims The SYNTAX II study evaluated the impact of advances in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), integrated into a single revascularization strategy, on outcomes of patients with de novo three-vessel disease. The study employed decision-making utilizing the SYNTAX score II, use of coronary physiology, thin-strut biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents, intravascular ultrasound, enhanced treatments of chronic total occlusions, and optimized medical therapy. Patients treated with this approach were compared with predefined patients from the SYNTAX I trial. Methods and results SYNTAX II was a multicentre, single-arm, open-label study of patients requiring revascularization who demonstrated clinical equipoise for treatment with either coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or PCI, predicted by the SYNTAX score II. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), which included any revascularization. The comparators were a matched PCI cohort trial and a matched CABG cohort, both from the SYNTAX I trial. At 5 years, MACCE rate in SYNTAX II was significantly lower than in the SYNTAX I PCI cohort (21.5% vs. 36.4%, P < 0.001). This reflected lower rates of revascularization (13.8% vs. 23.8%, P < 0.001), and myocardial infarction (MI) (2.7% vs. 10.4%, P < 0.001), consisting of both procedural MI (0.2% vs. 3.8%, P < 0.001) and spontaneous MI (2.3% vs. 6.9%, P = 0.004). All-cause mortality was lower in SYNTAX II (8.1% vs. 13.8%, P = 0.013) reflecting a lower rate of cardiac death (2.8% vs. 8.4%, P < 0.001). Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events’ outcomes at 5 years among patients in SYNTAX II and predefined patients in the SYNTAX I CABG cohort were similar (21.5% vs. 24.6%, P = 0.35). Conclusions Use of the SYNTAX II PCI strategy in patients with de novo three-vessel disease led to improved and durable clinical results when compared to predefined patients treated with PCI in the original SYNTAX I trial. A predefined exploratory analysis found no significant difference in MACCE between SYNTAX II PCI and matched SYNTAX I CABG patients at 5-year follow-up.

30 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Pulmonary ridge coverage was associated with a lower incidence of device related thrombosis (DRT) after LAAO and in multivariable analysis, the presence of PR coverage emerged as an independent predictor of DRT.
Abstract: AIMS The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of pulmonary ridge (PR) coverage on both clinical and imaging follow-up outcomes in patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). METHODS AND RESULTS The study included consecutive patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who underwent LAAO with disc and lobe devices. Patients were classified into two groups according to the PR coverage. A total of 147 patients were included. Among these, the PR was covered in 109 (74%) and uncovered in 38 (26%). Successful implantation was achieved in 98.6%. No differences in procedural outcomes were observed between the groups. The rate of procedural major adverse events was 3% (only major bleedings and/or vascular access complications). No device embolisation, cardiac tamponade or in-hospital mortality was observed. After a mean follow-up of 1.77±2.2 years, the annualised ischaemic stroke and major bleeding rate was 1.3%/year and 6.5%/year, respectively, without differences between groups. At follow-up, patients with a covered PR presented a lower incidence of device-related thrombosis (DRT) (1%) than those with an uncovered PR (27%); p<0.001. In multivariable analysis, the presence of PR coverage emerged as an independent predictor of DRT. CONCLUSIONS Pulmonary ridge coverage was associated with a lower incidence of DRT after LAAO. Procedural and follow-up clinical outcomes did not differ between covered PR and uncovered PR patients.

26 citations



Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the exact mechanisms leading to myocardial injury in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are still unknown, and the authors include all consecutive COVID19 patients admitted to the center.
Abstract: The exact mechanisms leading to myocardial injury in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are still unknown. In this retrospective observational study, we include all consecutive COVID-19 patients admitted to our center. They were divided into two groups according to the presence of myocardial injury. Clinical variables, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), C-reactive protein (CRP), CAC (COVID-19-associated coagulopathy), defined according to the ISTH score, treatment and in-hospital events were collected. Between March and April 2020, 331 COVID-19 patients were enrolled, 72 of them (21.8%) with myocardial injury. Patients with myocardial injury showed a higher CCI score (median (interquartile range), 5 (4-7) vs. 2 (1-4), p = 0.001), higher CRP values (18.3 (9.6-25.9) mg/dL vs. 12.0 (5.4-19.4) mg/dL, p ˂ 0.001) and CAC score (1 (0-2) vs. 0 (0-1), p = 0.001), and had lower use of any anticoagulant (57 patients (82.6%) vs. 229 patients (90.9%), p = 0.078), than those without. In the adjusted logistic regression, CRP, myocardial injury, CCI and CAC score were positive independent predictors of mortality, whereas anticoagulants resulted as a protective factor. Myocardial injury in COVID-19 patients is associated with inflammation and coagulopathy, resulting in a worse in-hospital prognosis. Treatment with anticoagulant agents may help to improve in-hospital outcomes.

16 citations



Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined the efficacy and safety of low-dose NOAC compared to single (SAPT) or dual antiplatelet therapies (DAPT), after left atrial appendage occlusion.
Abstract: The optimal antithrombotic strategy following left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is not yet clearly established. Low-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) might represent a valid alternative, but data regarding their usage is scarce. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of low-dose NOAC compared to single (SAPT) or dual antiplatelet therapies (DAPT) after LAAO. We included consecutive patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who underwent LAAO and received low-dose apixaban, SAPT, or DAPT at discharge. The primary objective of this study included an efficacy endpoint (thromboembolic events and device related thrombosis (DRT)) and a safety endpoint (incidence of major bleeding) within the first three months after LAAO. A total of 139 patients were included. This group involved SAPT in 26 (18%), DAPT in 73 (53%), and apixaban in 40 (29%) patients. Follow-up at three-months showed no significant differences in the primary efficacy endpoint (2 (8%) SAPT, 3 (4%) DAPT and 0 (0%) apixaban; p value = 0.25). In contrast, the primary safety endpoint occurred more frequently in DAPT patients (7 (10%) DAPT, 0 (0%), SAPT and 0 with apixaban; p value = 0.03). Combining both efficacy and safety outcomes, low dose apixaban had a lower rate of events (2 (8%) with SAPT, 9 (12%) with DAPT and 0 (0%) with apixaban; p = 0.046). Low-dose apixaban after LAAO may be a valid alternative to DAPT and SAPT as depicted by the reduction in the occurrence of major bleedings and combined DRT/major bleedings respectively. Randomized data will be necessary to validate this strategy.

9 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors found that myocardial injury defined by the rise of cardiac biomarkers in blood has been found in multiple studies with a prevalence of about 20% and its presence is related to worse clinical outcomes and in-hospital mortality.
Abstract: COVID-19 has shown significant morbidity with the involvement of multiple systems, including the cardiovascular system. Cardiovascular manifestations in the acute phase can include myocardial injury itself, myocardial infarction, venous thromboembolic events, myocarditis, Takotsubo syndrome, and different arrhythmic events. Myocardial injury defined by the rise of cardiac biomarkers in blood has been found in multiple studies with a prevalence of about 20%. Its presence is related to worse clinical outcomes and in-hospital mortality. The mechanisms of myocardial injury have been the subject of intense research but still need to be clarified. The characterization of the cardiac affectation with echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance has found mixed results in different studies, with a striking incidence of imaging criteria for myocarditis. Regarding post-acute and chronic follow-up results, the persistence of symptoms and imaging changes in recovered COVID-19 patients has raised concerns about the duration and the possible significance of these findings. Even though the knowledge about this disease has increased incredibly in the last year, many aspects are still unclear and warrant further research.

8 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
29 Jul 2021-PLOS ONE
TL;DR: In this article, a registry of patients who have undergone a diagnostic nasopharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV-2 and to determine their long-term cardiovascular outcomes is presented.
Abstract: Background Patients presenting with the coronavirus-2019 disease (COVID-19) may have a high risk of cardiovascular adverse events, including death from cardiovascular causes. The long-term cardiovascular outcomes of these patients are entirely unknown. We aim to perform a registry of patients who have undergone a diagnostic nasopharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV-2 and to determine their long-term cardiovascular outcomes. Study and design This is a multicenter, observational, retrospective registry to be conducted at 17 centers in Spain and Italy (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT04359927). Consecutive patients older than 18 years, who underwent a real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for SARS-CoV2 in the participating institutions, will be included since March 2020, to August 2020. Patients will be classified into two groups, according to the results of the RT-PCR: COVID-19 positive or negative. The primary outcome will be cardiovascular mortality at 1 year. The secondary outcomes will be acute myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure hospitalization, pulmonary embolism, and serious cardiac arrhythmias, at 1 year. Outcomes will be compared between the two groups. Events will be adjudicated by an independent clinical event committee. Conclusion The results of this registry will contribute to a better understanding of the long-term cardiovascular implications of the COVID19.

8 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
02 Apr 2021-PLOS ONE
TL;DR: In this paper, the performance of the recent CASTLE score to J-CTO, CL and PROGRESS CTO scores in a comprehensive database of percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusion procedures was compared.
Abstract: Background We aimed to compare the performance of the recent CASTLE score to J-CTO, CL and PROGRESS CTO scores in a comprehensive database of percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusion procedures. Methods Scores were calculated using raw data from 1,342 chronic total occlusion procedures included in REBECO Registry that includes learning and expert operators. Calibration, discrimination and reclassification were evaluated and compared. Results Mean score values were: CASTLE 1.60±1.10, J-CTO 2.15±1.24, PROGRESS 1.68±0.94 and CL 2.52±1.52 points. The overall percutaneous coronary intervention success rate was 77.8%. Calibration was good for CASTLE and CL, but not for J-CTO or PROGRESS scores. Discrimination: the area under the curve (AUC) of CASTLE (0.633) was significantly higher than PROGRESS (0.557) and similar to J-CTO (0.628) and CL (0.652). Reclassification: CASTLE, as assessed by integrated discrimination improvement, was superior to PROGRESS (integrated discrimination improvement +0.036, p Conclusion Procedural percutaneous coronary intervention difficulty is not consistently depicted by available chronic total occlusion scores and is influenced by the characteristics of each chronic total occlusion cohort. In our study population, including expert and learning operators, the CASTLE score had slightly better overall performance along with CL score. However, we found only intermediate performance in the c-statistic predicting chronic total occlusion success among all scores.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors compared sex-based differences in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) management and long-term clinical outcomes between women and men in a cohort of nonagenarians.
Abstract: Background: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains one of the leading causes of mortality for women, increasing with age. There is an unmet need regarding this condition in a fast-growing and predominantly female population, such as nonagenarians. Hypothesis: Our aim is to compare sex-based differences in ACS management and long-term clinical outcomes between women and men in a cohort of nonagenarians. Methods: We included consecutive nonagenarian patients with ACS admitted at four academic centers between 2005 and 2018. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of each center. Results: A total of 680 nonagenarians were included (59% females). Of them, 373 (55%) patients presented with non-ST-segment elevation ACS and 307 (45%) with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Men presented a higher disease burden compared to women. Conversely, women were frailer with higher disability and severe cognitive impairment. In the STEMI group, women were less likely than men to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (60% vs. 45%; p =.01). Overall mortality rates were similar in both groups but PCI survival benefit at 1-year was greater in women compared to their male counterparts (82% vs. 68%; p =.008), persisting after sensitivity analyses using propensity-score matching (80% vs. 64%; p =.03). Conclusion: Sex-gender disparities have been observed in nonagenarians. Despite receiving less often invasive approaches, women showed better clinical outcomes. Our finding may help increase awareness and reduce the current gender gap in ACS management at any age.


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) is common in patients with diabetes mellitus and data on the long‐term outcomes after treatment of CTOs in this high‐risk population are scarce.
Abstract: BACKGROUND Chronic total occlusion (CTO) is common in patients with diabetes mellitus. Data on the long-term outcomes after treatment of CTOs in this high-risk population are scarce. AIM To compare the long-term clinical outcomes of CTO revascularization either by coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus optimal medical treatment (MT) alone in patients with diabetes. METHODS AND RESULTS A total of 538 consecutive patients with diabetes and at least one CTO were identified from 2010 to 2014 in our center. In the present analysis, patients were stratified according to the CTO treatment strategy that was selected. MT was selected in 61% of patients whereas revascularization in the remaining 39%. Patients undergoing revascularization were younger, had higher left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), lower ACEF score, and more positive myocardial ischemia detection results compared to the MT group (p < .001).Patients referred for CABG had higher rates of left main disease compared to the PCI and MT groups (32% vs. 3% and 11%, respectively; p < .001). Complete revascularization was more often achieved in the CABG group, compared to the PCI group (62% vs. 32% p < .001). Multivariable analysis showed that revascularization with CABG was associated with lower rates of all-cause and cardiac mortality rates compared to MT, [hazard ratio (HR) 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25-0.70, p < .001 and HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.20-81, p = .011, respectively]. Successful CTO-PCI showed a trend towards benefit in all-cause mortality (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.33-1.04, p = .06). CONCLUSION In our registry, CTO revascularization in diabetic patients, especially with CABG, was associated with lower long-term mortality rates as compared to MT alone.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors report their initial experience with an edge-to-edge transcatheter tricuspid valve repair (TTVr) system in a high-volume institution.
Abstract: Transcatheter tricuspid valve repair (TTVr) has emerged as an alternative for the treatment of severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR). We report our initial experience with an edge-to-edge TTVr system in a high-volume institution. Methods: We included consecutive patients who underwent edge-to-edge TTVr systems. The primary efficacy endpoint was a reduction in the TR of at least one grade. The primary safety endpoint was procedure-related clinical serious adverse events. Results: A total of 28 patients underwent TTVr with edge-to-edge systems. All patients presented with at least severe TR with a high impact on quality of life (82% of patients in NYHA class ≥ III). The Triclip system was the most used device (89%). The primary efficacy endpoint was met in all patients. Only one patient experienced a procedural complication (femoral pseudoaneurysm). At three-month follow-up, 83% of patients were in NYHA I or II (18% baseline vs. 83% 3 months follow-up; p < 0.001). Echocardiography follow-up showed residual TR ≤ 2 in 79% of patients (paired p < 0.001). At the maximum follow-up (median follow up = 372 days), no patients had died. Conclusions: Edge-to-edge TTVr systems seem to represent a very valid alternative to prevent morbidity and mortality associated with TR as depicted by the favorable efficacy and safety.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Beta-blockers and antiplatelet agents in patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection (BA-SCAD) as mentioned in this paper was an academic, pragmatic, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint clinical trial, performed under the auspices of the Spanish Society of Cardiology.
Abstract: Introduction y objectives Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare cause of acute coronary syndrome. Most patients are empirically treated with beta-blockers and antiplatelet drugs. The Beta-blockers and Antiplatelet agents in patients with Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (BA-SCAD) is an academic, pragmatic, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint clinical trial, performed under the auspices of the Spanish Society of Cardiology, to assess the efficacy of pharmacological therapy in patients with SCAD. Methods Using a 2 x 2 factorial design, 600 patients will be randomized (1:1/1:1) to: a) beta-blockers (yes/no) and b) “short” (1 month) vs “prolonged” (12 months) antiplatelet therapy. Only patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction will be randomized to beta-blockers (yes/no) because patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction will receive beta-blockers according to current guidelines. Similarly, only conservatively managed patients (ie, no coronary intervention) will be randomized to the antiplatelet stratum, as patients requiring coronary interventions will receive 1-year dual antiplatelet therapy. The primary efficacy endpoint includes a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, recurrent SCAD, and unplanned hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome or heart failure at 1 year. The primary safety endpoint will be bleeding. All patients will be clinically followed up yearly. A comprehensive set of additional substudies (clinical, imaging, revascularization, biomarkers, inflammatory, immunologic, pharmacogenetics, and genetic) will be conducted to ensure a holistic view of this unique and challenging clinical entity. Conclusions The results of the BA-SCAD randomized clinical trial will advance our knowledge in the treatment of patients with SCAD. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04850417).

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors reviewed the new interventional strategies beyond stenting that may solve the suboptimal results that myocardial infarct patients still experience. But, despite increasing successful PCI procedures, mortality has remained unchanged in recent years.
Abstract: Myocardial infarction remains the principal cause of death in Europe. In patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), a promptly revascularization with primary percutaneous intervention (PCI) has transformed prognosis in the last decades. However, despite increasing successful PCI procedures, mortality has remained unchanged in recent years. Also, due to an unsatisfactory reperfusion, some patients have significant myocardial damage and suffer left ventricular adverse remodeling with reduced function-all that resulting in the onset of heart failure with all its inherent clinical and socioeconomic burden. As a consequence of longer ischemic times, distal thrombotic embolization, ischemia-reperfusion injury and microvascular dysfunction, the resultant myocardial infarct size is the major prognostic determinant in STEMI patients. The improved understanding of all the pathophysiology underlying these events has derived to the development of several novel therapies aiming to reduce infarct size and to improve clinical outcomes in these patients. In this article, based on the mechanisms involved in myocardial infarction prognosis, we review the new interventional strategies beyond stenting that may solve the suboptimal results that STEMI patients still experience.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: UFH administration at STEMI diagnosis improves coronary reperfusion prior to PPCI and this benefit seems associated with superior clinical outcomes, since its reported effect is greater the sooner UFH is administered after symptom onset.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors compared alcohol septal ablation (ASA) and myectomy (SM) to reduce the obstruction of the left ventricle outflow tract (LVOT) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Abstract: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) can cause symptoms due to the obstruction of the left ventricle outflow tract (LVOT). Although pharmacological therapy is the first step for treating this condition, many patients do not fully respond to the treatment, and an invasive approach is required to manage symptoms. Septal reduction therapies include septal myectomy (SM) and alcohol septal ablation (ASA). ASA consists of a selective infusion of high-grade alcohol into a septal branch supplying the basal interventricular septum to create an iatrogenic infarction with the aim of reducing LVOT obstruction. Currently, SM and ASA have the same level of indication; however, ASA is normally reserved for patients of advanced age, with comorbidities or when the surgical approach is not feasible. Recent data suggests that there are no differences in short- and long-term all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and sudden cardiac death between ASA and SM. Despite the greater experience and refinement of the technique gained in recent years, the most common complication continues to be complete atrio-ventricular block, requiring a permanent pacemaker. Septal reduction therapies should be performed in experienced centres with comprehensive programs.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: To compare the predictive performances of the prewires, postwiring MI‐SYNTAX scores, prewiring, and postwires Updated Logistic Clinical SYNTAT score for 2‐year all‐cause mortality post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ST‐elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, a comparison study is conducted.
Abstract: Objectives To compare the predictive performances of the prewiring, postwiring MI-SYNTAX scores, prewiring, and postwiring Updated Logistic Clinical SYNTAX score (LCSS) for 2-year all-cause mortality post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. Background In patients with STEMI and undergoing primary PCI, coronary stenosis(es) distal to the culprit lesion is often observed after the restoration of coronary flow. To address comprehensively the complex coronary anatomy in these patients, prewiring and postwiring MI-SYNTAX scores have been reported in the literature. Furthermore, to enable individualized risk estimation for long-term all-cause mortality, the Updated LCSS has been developed by combining the anatomical SYNTAX score and clinical factors. Methods In the randomized GLOBAL LEADERS trial, anatomical SYNTAX score analysis was performed by an independent angiographic corelab for the first 4,000 consecutive patients as a prespecified analysis; of these, 545 presented with STEMI. The efficacy of the mortality predictions of the four scores at 2 years were evaluated based on their discrimination and calibration abilities. Results Complete data was available in 512 patients (93.9%). When the patients were stratified into two groups based on the median of the scores, the prewiring and postwiring Updated LCSSs demonstrated that the high-score groups were associated with higher rates of 2-year all-cause mortality compared to the low-score groups (6.6 vs. 1.2%; log-rank p = .001 and 6.6 vs. 1.2%; log-rank p = .001, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences for predicting the mortality between the prewiring (area under the curve [AUC] 0.625), postwiring MI-SYNTAX score (AUC 0.614), prewiring (AUC 0.755), and postwiring Updated LCSS (AUC 0.757). In the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), the prewiring MI-SYNTAX score had a better discrimination for the mortality than the postwiring MI-SYNTAX score (IDI -0.0082; p = .029). The four scores had acceptable calibration abilities for 2-year all-cause mortality. Conclusions The prewiring Updated LCSS predicts long-term all-cause mortality with clearly useful discrimination and acceptable calibration. Since the postwiring MI-SYNTAX score does not improve mortality prediction, the prewiring MI-SYNTAX score may be preferred for the 2-year mortality prediction using the Updated LCSS.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors analyzed characteristics of nonagenarian patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and compared in-hospital and 1-year clinical outcomes between those treated with medical treatment (MT) alone and those receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors describe the uso contemporaneo de the dispositivos de modificacion de placa (DMP) in this context, and compare the use of DMP with no DMP.
Abstract: Resumen Introduccion y objetivos La calcificacion grave esta presente en mas del 50% de las oclusiones coronarias cronicas totales (OCT) tratadas mediante intervencion percutanea. Nuestro objetivo fue describir el uso contemporaneo de los dispositivos de modificacion de placa (DMP) en este contexto. Metodos Los pacientes se incluyeron en el Registro Iberico de OCT de forma prospectiva y consecutiva (32 centros de Espana y Portugal), de 2015 a 2020. Se compararon en funcion del uso o no de DMP. Resultados Se incluyo a 2.235 pacientes, en 1.900 de los cuales se logro cruzar con exito la lesion con guia. Se utilizo al menos un DMP en un 7% (134 pacientes) y mas de uno en 24 pacientes (1%). Los DMP seleccionados fueron: aterectomia rotacional (35,1%), litotricia (5,2%), laser (11,2%), balones de corte (27,6%), balones OPN (2,9%) o combinaciones de mas de uno (18%). Se utilizaron DMP en pacientes mas ancianos, con mayor riesgo cardiovascular y puntuaciones Syntax y J-CTO mas elevados. Esta mayor complejidad se asocio con procedimientos mas prolongados, pero similar longitud total de stent (52 frente a 57 mm; p = 0,105). Cuando la guia cruzo con exito la oclusion, la tasa de exito final del procedimiento fue del 87,2%, pero se incremento al 96,3% cuando se utilizaron DMP (p = 0,001). Por el contrario, los DMP no se asociaron con mayor tasa de complicaciones en el procedimiento (3,7 frente a 3,2%; p = 0,615). Pese al peor perfil de riesgo basal, a los 2 anos de seguimiento no hubo diferencias en la tasa de supervivencia (94,3% DPM frente a no-DMP: 94,3% no-DPM, respectivamente, p = 0,967). Conclusiones Cuando la guia cruzo con exito una OCT, la tasa de uso de los DMP fue del 7% y se asocio a una tasa de exito final del procedimiento significativamente mayor. Los resultados a medio plazo fueron comparables cuando se precisaron DMP pese a su mayor riesgo basal, lo que sugiere que un mayor uso adecuado de estas tecnicas en este contexto podria conllevar tanto beneficios tecnicos como pronosticos.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the logistic clinical SYNTAX score was updated after imputing missing values by refitting the original model (refitted original model) and fitting an extended new model (new model, with, selection based on the Akaike Information Criterion) external validation was performed in 10,100 patients having PCI at Fu Wai hospital Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, prior stroke, current smoker, hemoglobin level, and white blood cell count were included into the new model.
Abstract: Aims: We aimed to update the logistic clinical SYNTAX score to predict 2 year all-cause mortality after contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) Methods and results: We analyzed 15,883 patients in the GLOBAL LEADERS study who underwent PCI The logistic clinical SYNTAX model was updated after imputing missing values by refitting the original model (refitted original model) and fitting an extended new model (new model, with, selection based on the Akaike Information Criterion) External validation was performed in 10,100 patients having PCI at Fu Wai hospital Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, prior stroke, current smoker, hemoglobin level, and white blood cell count were identified as additional independent predictors of 2 year all-cause mortality and included into the new model The c-indexes of the original, refitted original and the new model in the derivation cohort were 074 (95% CI 072–076), 075 (95% CI 073–077), and 078 (95% CI 076–080), respectively The c-index of the new model was lower in the validation cohort than in the derivation cohort, but still showed improved discriminative ability of the newly developed model (072; 95% CI 067–077) compared to the refitted original model (069; 95% CI 064–074) The models overestimated the observed 2 year all-cause mortality of 111% in the Chinese external validation cohort by 054 percentage points, indicating the need for calibration of the model to the Chinese patient population Conclusions: The new model of the logistic clinical SYNTAX score better predicts 2 year all-cause mortality after PCI than the original model The new model could guide clinical decision making by risk stratifying patients undergoing PCI

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, drug-eluting stents (DES) reduce target-vessel revascularization compared with bare-metal stents compared with BMS, and recent data suggest that DES have the potential to decrease the...
Abstract: Background New‐generation drug‐eluting stents (DES) reduce target‐vessel revascularization compared with bare‐metal stents (BMS), and recent data suggest that DES have the potential to decrease the...

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on clinical outcomes in chronic total occlusion (CTO) patients is scarce, and the optimal treatment strategy for this population is not well established.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Patients with CTO and reduced LVEF treated with medical therapy had a worse prognosis than those treated with revascularization (either CABG or PCI) and patients with an indication for CABGs appeared to perform best during long-term follow-up.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The sirolimus-eluting resorbable magnesium scaffold Magmaris is the only CE-marked metallic bioresorbable scaffold and provides short-term lumen support before being completely bioresorbed as mentioned in this paper.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This is the case of a 65-year-old male with permanent atrial fibrillation, CHA2DS2VASc of 7, and previous history of intracranial hemorrhage under oral anticoagulation, which highlights the fact that a central thrombus not always reflects a central origin.
Abstract: This is the case of a 65-year-old male with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF), CHA2DS2VASc of 7, and previous history of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) under oral anticoagulation. The patient underwent left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) with the implant of a 25-mm Amulet device without complications. Device implantation was slightly deep, and pulmonary ridge was not covered by the device disc (Fig. 1a). The patient was discharged under dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT). At 3 months, TEE showed a small thrombus below the pulmonary ridge (Fig. 1b). Considering the small size of the thrombus and previous history of ICH, DAPT was continued. A new TEE after 2 months showed a giant central protruding thrombus (25 × 23 mm) (Fig. 1c). DAPT was therefore substituted by apixaban 2.5 mg/12 h (adjusted for renal function). After 3 months, the size of the thrombus was clearly smaller (11 × 10 mm) (Fig. 1d), and apixaban was continued. Six months later, TEE showed complete DRT resolution (Fig. 1e). Aspirin was therefore started, and an additional TEEs showed no novel thrombus (Fig. 1f). The patient did not experience any symptom that could suggest an embolic event during the clinical follow-up. Device related thrombosis (DRT) is currently one of the most concerning topics in the LAAO field. A central thrombus is defined as the one that is originated around the central pin or screw in the disc of the device. In previous series, this central location was described as the most frequent site for DRT [1]. Recently, it has been shown that the area below the pulmonary ridge is the most common location for DRT [2]. Other described DRT patterns are the ones that cover the entire disc in a diffuse and thin manner [3]. Some potential risk factors for DRT have been described: permanent AF, large LAA, prior stroke, higher CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores, chronic kidney disease, older age, and reduced ejection fraction [4–6]. Our patient presented a higher CHA2DS2VASc score, chronic kidney disease, and older age as potential risk factors for DRT. Among others, the absence of pulmonary ridge coverage may also represent a risk factor as it might generate areas of flow-turbulence and low-blood velocities [2, 7]. The present case highlights the fact that a central thrombus not always reflects a central origin. In this case, the coagulation cascade that was enhanced after the initial thrombus formation was probably the trigger for this giant central DRT. In our case, it is possible that oral anticoagulation had work better than antiplatelet therapy in the resolution of the thrombus, as DRT may imply a low flow situation such as observed in large veins or at r ia l /cardiac chambers . In fac t , anticoagulation has been shown to be superior to antiplatelet agents for stroke/thromboembolic prevention in AF [8]. More studies will be necessary to evaluate if not only upper DRT but also central thrombus are linked to the absence of pulmonary ridge coverage.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors used OCT to assess the longitudinal neointimal distribution pattern after EES implantation using OCT data from three prospective studies (HEAL-EES, REVER and RESERVOIR).

Journal ArticleDOI
27 Jul 2021
TL;DR: How primary percutaneous coronary intervention can be optimized with respect to stent selection and revascularization strategy to reduce myocardial damage and improve clinical outcomes is discussed.
Abstract: espanolLa cardiopatia isquemica es la causa mas comun de mortalidad en todo el mundo. En pacientes con infarto agudo de miocardio con elevacion del segmento ST (IAMCEST), la optimizacion de la intervencion coronaria percutanea primaria es crucial para mejorar el pronostico. Durante estos ultimos anos se han publicado muchos estudios sobre el valor de los stents de segunda generacion, sobre estrategias para reducir el dano miocardico, sobre como conseguir la revascularizacion completa y sobre dispositivos de apoyo circulatorio mecanico percutaneo que representan una opcion terapeutica atractiva en pacientes con IAMCEST complicado con shock cardiogenico. En esta revision se discute como se puede optimizar la intervencion coronaria percutanea primaria con respecto a la seleccion de los stents y la estrategia de revascularizacion, con el fin de reducir el dano miocardico y mejorar los resultados clinicos. Ademas, se revisan los datos publicados sobre el uso de dispositivos de apoyo circulatorio mecanico en pacientes con IAMCEST complicado por shock cardiogen EnglishIschemic heart disease is the most common cause of death worldwide. In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), optimizing primary percutaneous coronary intervention is crucial to improve prognosis. Over the years, many studies have been published on the value of second-generation stents, strategies to reduce myocardial damage, how to achieve complete revascularization and also on percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices, which all are attractive therapeutic options to treat patients with STEMI complicated by cardiogenic shock. In this review we will be discussing how primary percutaneous coronary intervention can be optimized with respect to stent selection and revascularization strategy to reduce myocardial damage and improve clinical outcomes. In addition, we review published data on the use of mechanical circulatory support devices in patients with STEMI complicated by cardiogenic shock.