T
Thomas M.S. Wolever
Researcher at University of Toronto
Publications - 398
Citations - 33938
Thomas M.S. Wolever is an academic researcher from University of Toronto. The author has contributed to research in topics: Glycemic index & Glycemic. The author has an hindex of 91, co-authored 388 publications receiving 31323 citations. Previous affiliations of Thomas M.S. Wolever include Toronto General Hospital & University of Agriculture, Faisalabad.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The molecular weight, solubility and viscosity of oat beta-glucan affect human glycemic response by modifying starch digestibility.
TL;DR: The interaction between oat β-glucan and other food components has the potential to influence starch digestibility and consequently affect its bioactivity in reducing glycemic responses and the peak blood glucose response and the incremental area under the curve (iAUC) were lower in the 40g than in the 60g starch formulation.
Journal ArticleDOI
Beneficial effect of a low glycaemic index diet in type 2 diabetes.
Thomas M.S. Wolever,David J.A. Jenkins,Vladimir Vuksan,Alexandra L. Jenkins,G.C. Buckley,G S Wong,Robert G. Josse +6 more
TL;DR: It is suggested that low glycaemic index starchy foods may be beneficial in the treatment of Type 2 diabetes.
Journal ArticleDOI
High-carbohydrate–low-glycaemic index dietary advice improves glucose disposition index in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance
TL;DR: High-carbohydrate–low-GI dietary advice improved β -cell function in subjects with IGT, and may, therefore, be useful in the management of IGT.
Journal ArticleDOI
Acute effects of intravenous and rectal acetate on glucagon-like peptide-1, peptide YY, ghrelin, adiponectin and tumour necrosis factor-α
TL;DR: It is suggested that acetate raises plasma PYY and GLP-1, and suppresses TNF-α, in hyperinsulinaemic females, and increasing colonic fermentation products, particularly acetate, could yield a new mechanism for modifying weight gain.
Journal ArticleDOI
Measuring the glycemic index of foods: interlaboratory study
Thomas M.S. Wolever,Jennie Brand-Miller,John Abernethy,Arne Astrup,Fiona S. Atkinson,Mette Axelsen,Inger Björck,Furio Brighenti,Rachel Brown,Audrey E. Brynes,M. Cristina Casiraghi,Murielle Cazaubiel,Linda Dahlqvist,Elizabeth Delport,Gareth Denyer,Daniela Erba,Gary Frost,Yvonne Granfeldt,Shelagh M. Hampton,Valerie Hart,Katja A. Hätönen,C. Jeya K. Henry,Steve Hertzler,Sarah Hull,Johann C. Jerling,Kelly L Johnston,Helen J. Lightowler,Neil Mann,Linda M. Morgan,Leonora N. Panlasigui,Christine L. Pelkman,Tracy L. Perry,Andreas Pfeiffer,Marlien Pieters,D. Dan Ramdath,Rayna T Ramsingh,S Daniel Robert,Carol Robinson,Essi Sarkkinen,Francesca Scazzina,Dave Clark D Sison,Birgitte Sloth,Jane Staniforth,Niina Tapola,Liisa Valsta,Inge Verkooijen,Martin O. Weickert,Antje R. Weseler,Paul Wilkie,Jian Zhang +49 more
TL;DR: The results suggest that common misconceptions exist about which factors do and do not need to be controlled to improve precision and Controlled studies and cost-benefit analyses are needed to optimize GI methodology.