scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Wade C. Rowatt published in 2004"


Journal ArticleDOI
David P. Schmitt1, Lidia Alcalay2, Melissa Allensworth1, Jüri Allik3, Lara Ault4, Ivars Austers5, Kevin Bennett6, Gabriel Bianchi7, Fredrick Boholst8, Mary Ann Borg Cunen9, Johan Braeckman10, Edwin G. Brainerd11, Leo Gerard A. Caral8, Gabrielle Caron, María Martina Casullo12, Michael Cunningham4, Ikuo Daibo13, Charlotte J. S. De Backer10, Eros De Souza14, Rolando Díaz-Loving15, Glaucia Ribeiro Starling Diniz16, Kevin Durkin17, Marcela Echegaray18, Ekin Eremsoy19, Harald A. Euler20, Ruth Falzon9, Maryanne L. Fisher21, Dolores Foley22, Robert Fowler1, Douglas P. Fry23, Sirpa Fry23, M. Arif Ghayur24, Vijai N. Giri25, Debra L. Golden26, Karl Grammer, Liria Grimaldi27, Jamin Halberstadt28, Shamsul Haque29, Dora Herrera18, Janine Hertel30, Amanda Hitchell1, Heather Hoffmann31, Danica Hooper22, Zuzana Hradilekova32, Jasna Hudek-Kene-Evi33, Allen I. Huffcutt1, Jas Laile Suzana Binti Jaafar34, Margarita Jankauskaite35, Heidi Kabangu-Stahel, Igor Kardum33, Brigitte Khoury36, Hayrran Kwon37, Kaia Laidra3, Anton Laireiter38, Dustin Lakerveld39, Ada Lampert, Mary Anne Lauri9, Marguerite Lavallée, Suk-Jae Lee40, Luk Chung Leung41, Kenneth D. Locke42, Vance Locke17, Ivan Lukšík7, Ishmael Magaisa43, Dalia Marcinkeviciene35, André Mata44, Rui Mata44, Barry Mccarthy45, Michael E. Mills46, Nhlanhla Mkhize47, João Manuel Moreira44, Sérgio Moreira44, Miguel Moya48, M. Munyae49, Patricia Noller22, Hmoud Olimat50, Adrian Opre51, Alexia Panayiotou52, Nebojša Petrović53, Karolien Poels10, Miroslav Popper7, Maria Poulimenou54, Volodymyr P'Yatokha, Michel Raymond55, Ulf-Dietrich Reips56, Susan E. Reneau57, Sofía Rivera-Aragón15, Wade C. Rowatt58, Willibald Ruch59, Velko S. Rus60, Marilyn P. Safir61, Sonia Salas62, Fabio Sambataro27, Kenneth Sandnabba23, Rachel Schleeter1, Marion K. Schulmeyer, Astrid Schütz30, Tullio Scrimali27, Todd K. Shackelford63, Mithila B. Sharan25, Phillip R. Shaver64, Francis J Sichona65, Franco Simonetti2, Tilahun Sineshaw66, R. Sookdew47, Tom Speelman10, Spyros Spyrou67, H. Canan Sümer, Nebi Sümer68, Marianna Supekova7, Tomasz Szlendak, Robin Taylor69, Bert Timmermans70, William Tooke71, Ioannis Tsaousis72, F. S.K. Tungaraza65, Ashley Turner1, Griet Vandermassen10, Tim Vanhoomissen73, Frank Van Overwalle73, Ine Vanwesenbeeck, Paul L. Vasey74, João Veríssimo44, Martin Voracek75, Wendy W.N. Wan76, Ta-Wei Wang77, Peter Weiss78, Andik Wijaya, Liesbeth Woertman39, Gahyun Youn79, Agata Zupanèiè60 
Bradley University1, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile2, University of Tartu3, University of Louisville4, University of Latvia5, University of New Mexico6, Slovak Academy of Sciences7, University of San Carlos8, University of Malta9, Ghent University10, Clemson University11, University of Buenos Aires12, Osaka University13, Illinois State University14, National Autonomous University of Mexico15, University of Brasília16, University of Western Australia17, University of Lima18, Boğaziçi University19, University of Kassel20, University of York21, University of Queensland22, Åbo Akademi University23, Al Akhawayn University24, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur25, University of Hawaii at Manoa26, University of Catania27, University of Otago28, University of Dhaka29, Chemnitz University of Technology30, Knox College31, Comenius University in Bratislava32, University of Rijeka33, University of Malaya34, Vilnius University35, American University of Beirut36, Kwangju Health College37, University of Salzburg38, Utrecht University39, National Computerization Agency40, City University of Hong Kong41, University of Idaho42, University of Zimbabwe43, University of Lisbon44, University of Central Lancashire45, Loyola Marymount University46, University of Natal47, University of Granada48, University of Botswana49, University of Jordan50, Babeș-Bolyai University51, University of Cyprus52, University of Belgrade53, KPMG54, University of Montpellier55, University of Zurich56, University of Alabama57, Baylor University58, Queen's University Belfast59, University of Ljubljana60, University of Haifa61, University of La Serena62, Florida Atlantic University63, University of California, Davis64, University of Dar es Salaam65, Ramapo College66, Cyprus College67, Middle East Technical University68, University of the South Pacific69, VU University Amsterdam70, State University of New York System71, University of the Aegean72, Vrije Universiteit Brussel73, University of Lethbridge74, University of Vienna75, University of Hong Kong76, Yuan Ze University77, Charles University in Prague78, Chonnam National University79
TL;DR: In the International Sexuality Description Project, a total of 17,804 participants from 62 cultural regions completed the RelationshipQuestionnaire (RQ), a self-report measure of adult romantic attachment as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: As part of the International Sexuality Description Project, a total of 17,804 participants from 62 cultural regions completedthe RelationshipQuestionnaire(RQ), a self-reportmeasure of adult romanticattachment. Correlational analyses within each culture suggested that the Model of Self and the Model of Other scales of the RQ were psychometrically valid within most cultures. Contrary to expectations, the Model of Self and Model of Other dimensions of the RQ did not underlie the four-category model of attachment in the same way across all cultures. Analyses of specific attachment styles revealed that secure romantic attachment was normative in 79% of cultures and that preoccupied romantic attachment was particularly prevalent in East Asian cultures. Finally, the romantic attachment profiles of individual nations were correlated with sociocultural indicators in ways that supported evolutionary theories of romantic attachment and basic human mating strategies.

314 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article examined associations between some dimensions of religiosity and implicit racial prejudice and found that right-wing authoritarianism was positively associated with the race-IAT effect, while Christian orthodoxy was negatively related (β = -.26).
Abstract: This study examined associations between some dimensions of religiosity and implicit racial prejudice. Implicit racial prejudice was measured with S. D. Farnham's (1998) Implicit Association Test (IAT), a software program that records reaction time as participants categorize names (of Blacks and Whites) and adjectives (pleasant or unpleasant). Participants also completed self-report measures of religious fundamentalism, Christian orthodoxy, religious orientations (i.e., intrinsic, extrinsic, quest), right-wing authoritarianism, and social desirability. White college students took significantly longer to categorize names and adjectives in one IAT condition (White-unpleasant, Black-pleasant) than in a second IAT condition (White-pleasant, Black-unpleasant), the race-IAT effect. A multiple regression analysis revealed that right-wing authoritarianism was positively associated with the race-IAT effect (β = .31), Christian orthodoxy was negatively related (β = -.26), and religious fundamentalism (β = .02) and ...

124 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, three types of negative emotion (hard, soft, and fear based) were believed to be integral to functioning in close interpersonal relationships and Confirmatory Factor Analysis was used to predict relationship functioning.
Abstract: Three types of negative emotion (hard, soft, and fear based) were believed to be integral to functioning in close interpersonal relationships. Hard emotion includes feeling angry, soft emotion includes feeling sad or hurt, and fear-based emotion includes feeling anxious or threatened. Married persons (studies 1 and 3) and college roommates (study 2) rated the extent to which they would feel different emotions in response to a variety of negative partner behaviors. Confirmatory Factor Analysis supported the distinction between the three types of emotion. Although hard and soft negative emotions were highly positively correlated, they had opposite effects when used to predict relationship functioning. After controlling for shared variance between the emotions, soft emotion was associated with positive relationship functioning (high satisfaction, low conflict, and low avoidance) and hard emotion was associated with negative relationship functioning (low satisfaction, high conflict, and high avoidance). In contrast, fear-based emotion was strongly, positively, and uniquely associated with relationship anxiety.

54 citations