scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Erasmus University Rotterdam

EducationRotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
About: Erasmus University Rotterdam is a education organization based out in Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Health care. The organization has 35466 authors who have published 91288 publications receiving 4510972 citations. The organization is also known as: EUR.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Exercise therapy appears to be slightly effective at decreasing pain and improving function in adults with chronic low-back pain, particularly in healthcare populations.
Abstract: Background Exercise therapy is widely used as an intervention in low-back pain. Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of exercise therapy in adult non-specific acute, subacute and chronic low-back pain versus no treatment and other conservative treatments. Search methods The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 3, 2004), MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychInfo, CINAHL databases to October 2004; citation searches and bibliographic reviews of previous systematic reviews. Selection criteria Randomized controlled trials evaluating exercise therapy for adult non-specific low-back pain and measuring pain, function, return-to-work/absenteeism, and/or global improvement outcomes. Data collection and analysis Two reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data on study characteristics, quality, and outcomes at short, intermediate, and long-term follow-up. Main results Sixty-one randomized controlled trials (6390 participants) met inclusion criteria: acute (11), subacute (6) and chronic (43) low-back pain (1 unclear). Evidence was found of effectiveness in chronic populations relative to comparisons at all follow-up periods; pooled mean improvement was 7.3 points (95% CI, 3.7 to 10.9) for pain (out of 100), 2.5 points (1.0 to 3.9) for function (out of 100) at earliest follow-up. In studies investigating patients (i.e. presenting to healthcare providers) mean improvement was 13.3 points (5.5 to 21.1) for pain, 6.9 (2.2 to 11.7) for function, representing significantly greater improvement over studies where participants included those recruited from a general population (e.g. with advertisements). There is some evidence of effectiveness of graded-activity exercise program in subacute low-back pain in occupational settings, though the evidence for other types of exercise therapy in other populations is inconsistent. There was evidence of equal effectiveness relative to comparisons in acute populations [pain: 0.03 points (95% CI, -1.3 to 1.4)]. Limitations: This review largely reflects limitations of the literature, including low quality studies with heterogeneous outcome measures, inconsistent and poor reporting, and possibility of publication bias. Authors' conclusions Exercise therapy appears to be slightly effective at decreasing pain and improving function in adults with chronic low-back pain, particularly in healthcare populations. In subacute low-back pain there is some evidence that a graded activity program improves absenteeism outcomes, though evidence for other types of exercise is unclear. In acute low-back pain, exercise therapy is as effective as either no treatment or other conservative treatments.

847 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is suggested that a high saturated fat and cholesterol intake increases the risk of dementia, whereas fish consumption may decrease this risk.
Abstract: A high intake of saturated fat and cholesterol and a low intake of polyunsaturated fatty acids have been related to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular disease has been associated with dementia. We investigated the association between fat intake and incident dementia among participants, age 55 years or older, from the populationbased prospective Rotterdam Study. Food intake of 5,386 nondemented participants was assessed at baseline with a semiquantitative food-frequency questionnaire. At baseline and after an average of 2.1 years of follow-up, we screened for dementia with a three-step protocol that included a clinical examination. The risk of dementia at follow-up (RR [95% CI]) was assessed with logistic regression. After adjustment for age, sex, education, and energy intake, high intakes of the following nutrients were associated with an increased risk of dementia: total fat (RR = 2.4 [1.1-5.2]), saturated fat (RR = 1.9 [0.9-4.0]), and cholesterol (RR = 1.7 [0.9-3.21). Dementia with a vascular component was most strongly related to total fat and saturated fat. Fish consumption, an important source of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, was inversely related to incident dementia (RR = 0.4 [0.2-0.9]), and in particular to Alzheimer's disease (RR = 0.3 [0.10.91). This study suggests that a high saturated fat and cholesterol intake increases the risk of dementia, whereas fish consumption may decrease this risk. Kalmijn S, Launer LJ, Ott A, Witteman JCM, Hofman A, Breteler MMB. Dietary fat intake and the risk of incident dementia in the Rotterdam study. Ann Neurol 1997;42:776-782

847 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The publication of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 and the accompanying collection of Lancet articles in December 2012 provided the most comprehensive attempt to quantify the burden of almost 300 diseases, injuries, and risk factors, including neglected tropical diseases (NTDs).
Abstract: The publication of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 (GBD 2010) and the accompanying collection of Lancet articles in December 2012 provided the most comprehensive attempt to quantify the burden of almost 300 diseases, injuries, and risk factors, including neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) [1]–[3]. The disability-adjusted life year (DALY), the metric used in the GBD 2010, is a tool which may be used to assess and compare the relative impact of a number of diseases locally and globally [4]–[6]. Table 1 lists the major NTDs as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) [7] and their estimated DALYs [1]. With a few exceptions, most of the NTDs currently listed by the WHO [7] or those on the expanded list from PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases [8] are disablers rather than killers, so the DALY estimates represent one of the few metrics available that could fully embrace the chronic effects of these infections. Table 1 Estimated DALYs (in millions) of the NTDs from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Disease DALYs from GBD 2010 (numbers in parentheses indicate 95% confidence intervals) [1] NTDs 26.06 (20.30–35.12) Intestinal nematode infections 5.19 (2.98–8.81) Hookworm disease 3.23 (1.70–5.73) Ascariasis 1.32 (0.71–2.35) Trichuriasis 0.64 (0.35–1.06) Leishmaniasis 3.32 (2.18–4.90) Schistosomiasis 3.31 (1.70–6.26) Lymphatic filariasis 2.78 (1.8–4.00) Food-borne trematodiases 1.88 (0.70–4.84) Rabies 1.46 ((0.85–2.66) Dengue 0.83 (0.34–1.41) African trypanosomiasis 0.56 (0.08–1.77) Chagas disease 0.55 (0.27–1.05) Cysticercosis 0.50 (0.38–0.66) Onchocerciasis 0.49 (0.36–0.66) Trachoma 0.33 (0.24–0.44) Echinococcosis 0.14 (0.07–0.29) Yellow fever <0.001 Other NTDs * 4.72 (3.53–6.35) Open in a separate window * Relapsing fevers, typhus fever, spotted fever, Q fever, other rickettsioses, other mosquito-borne viral fevers, unspecified arthropod-borne viral fever, arenaviral haemorrhagic fever, toxoplasmosis, unspecified protozoal disease, taeniasis, diphyllobothriasis and sparganosis, other cestode infections, dracunculiasis, trichinellosis, strongyloidiasis, enterobiasis, and other helminthiases. Even DALYs, however, do not tell the complete story of the harmful effects from NTDs. Some of the specific and potential shortcomings of GBD 2010 have been highlighted elsewhere [9]. Furthermore, DALYs measure only direct health loss and, for example, do not consider the economic impact of the NTDs that results from detrimental effects on school attendance and child development, agriculture (especially from zoonotic NTDs), and overall economic productivity [10], [11]. Nor do DALYs account for direct costs of treatment, surveillance, and prevention measures. Yet, economic impact has emerged as an essential feature of the NTDs, which may trap people in a cycle of poverty and disease [10]–[12]. Additional aspects not considered by the DALY metrics are the important elements of social stigma for many of the NTDs and the spillover effects to family and community members [13], [14], loss of tourism [15], and health system overload (e.g., during dengue outbreaks). Ultimately NTD control and elimination efforts could produce social and economic benefits not necessarily reflected in the DALY metrics, especially among the most affected poor communities [11].

842 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors compared inequalities in morbidity and mortality between different countries in western Europe and found that Sweden and Norway had larger relative inequalities in health than most other countries for both measures.

842 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Oliver A. Cornely, Ana Alastruey-Izquierdo1, Dorothee Arenz2, Sharon C.-A. Chen3, Eric Dannaoui4, Bruno Hochhegger5, Bruno Hochhegger6, Martin Hoenigl7, Martin Hoenigl8, Henrik Jeldtoft Jensen9, Katrien Lagrou10, Russell E. Lewis11, Sibylle C. Mellinghoff2, Mervyn Mer12, Zoi D. Pana13, Danila Seidel2, Donald C. Sheppard14, Roger Wahba2, Murat Akova15, Alexandre Alanio16, Abdullah M. S. Al-Hatmi17, Sevtap Arikan-Akdagli15, Hamid Badali18, Ronen Ben-Ami19, Alexandro Bonifaz20, Stéphane Bretagne16, Elio Castagnola21, Methee Chayakulkeeree22, Arnaldo Lopes Colombo23, Dora E. Corzo-Leon24, Lubos Drgona25, Andreas H. Groll26, Jesús Guinea27, Jesús Guinea28, Claus Peter Heussel29, Ashraf S. Ibrahim30, Souha S. Kanj31, Nikolay Klimko, Michaela Lackner32, Frédéric Lamoth33, Fanny Lanternier4, Cornelia Lass-Floerl32, Dong-Gun Lee34, Thomas Lehrnbecher35, Badre E. Lmimouni, Mihai Mares, Georg Maschmeyer, Jacques F. Meis, Joseph Meletiadis36, Joseph Meletiadis37, C. Orla Morrissey38, Marcio Nucci39, Rita O. Oladele, Livio Pagano40, Alessandro C. Pasqualotto41, Atul Patel, Zdenek Racil, Malcolm Richardson, Emmanuel Roilides13, Markus Ruhnke, Seyedmojtaba Seyedmousavi42, Seyedmojtaba Seyedmousavi18, Neeraj Sidharthan43, Nina Singh44, Janos Sinko, Anna Skiada37, Monica A. Slavin45, Monica A. Slavin46, Rajeev Soman47, Brad Spellberg48, William J. Steinbach49, Ban Hock Tan50, Andrew J. Ullmann, Joerg J. Vehreschild35, Maria J G T Vehreschild35, Thomas J. Walsh51, P. Lewis White52, Nathan P. Wiederhold53, Theoklis E. Zaoutis54, Arunaloke Chakrabarti55 
Carlos III Health Institute1, University of Cologne2, University of Sydney3, Paris Descartes University4, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul5, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre6, Medical University of Graz7, University of California, San Diego8, University of Copenhagen9, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven10, University of Bologna11, University of the Witwatersrand12, RMIT University13, McGill University14, Hacettepe University15, University of Paris16, Utrecht University17, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences18, Tel Aviv University19, Hospital General de México20, Istituto Giannina Gaslini21, Mahidol University22, Federal University of São Paulo23, King's College, Aberdeen24, Comenius University in Bratislava25, Boston Children's Hospital26, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón27, Complutense University of Madrid28, University Hospital Heidelberg29, University of California, Los Angeles30, American University of Beirut31, Innsbruck Medical University32, University of Lausanne33, Catholic University of Korea34, Goethe University Frankfurt35, Erasmus University Rotterdam36, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens37, Monash University38, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro39, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart40, University of Health Sciences Antigua41, National Institutes of Health42, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre43, University of Pittsburgh44, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre45, University of Melbourne46, P. D. Hinduja Hospital and Medical Research Centre47, University of Southern California48, Duke University49, Singapore General Hospital50, NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital51, Cardiff University52, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio53, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia54, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research55
TL;DR: Management of mucormycosis depends on recognising disease patterns and on early diagnosis, and limited availability of contemporary treatments burdens patients in low and middle income settings.
Abstract: Mucormycosis is a difficult to diagnose rare disease with high morbidity and mortality. Diagnosis is often delayed, and disease tends to progress rapidly. Urgent surgical and medical intervention is lifesaving. Guidance on the complex multidisciplinary management has potential to improve prognosis, but approaches differ between health-care settings. From January, 2018, authors from 33 countries in all United Nations regions analysed the published evidence on mucormycosis management and provided consensus recommendations addressing differences between the regions of the world as part of the "One World One Guideline" initiative of the European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM). Diagnostic management does not differ greatly between world regions. Upon suspicion of mucormycosis appropriate imaging is strongly recommended to document extent of disease and is followed by strongly recommended surgical intervention. First-line treatment with high-dose liposomal amphotericin B is strongly recommended, while intravenous isavuconazole and intravenous or delayed release tablet posaconazole are recommended with moderate strength. Both triazoles are strongly recommended salvage treatments. Amphotericin B deoxycholate is recommended against, because of substantial toxicity, but may be the only option in resource limited settings. Management of mucormycosis depends on recognising disease patterns and on early diagnosis. Limited availability of contemporary treatments burdens patients in low and middle income settings. Areas of uncertainty were identified and future research directions specified.

842 citations


Authors

Showing all 35695 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Walter C. Willett3342399413322
Meir J. Stampfer2771414283776
Albert Hofman2672530321405
Graham A. Colditz2611542256034
Paul M. Ridker2331242245097
Ralph B. D'Agostino2261287229636
John Q. Trojanowski2261467213948
David J. Hunter2131836207050
André G. Uitterlinden1991229156747
Robert M. Califf1961561167961
Eric J. Topol1931373151025
Frank E. Speizer193636135891
Bernard Rosner1901162147661
William B. Kannel188533175659
Patrick W. Serruys1862427173210
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Emory University
122.4K papers, 6M citations

94% related

University of Pittsburgh
201K papers, 9.6M citations

94% related

University of Pennsylvania
257.6K papers, 14.1M citations

93% related

Duke University
200.3K papers, 10.7M citations

93% related

Utrecht University
139.3K papers, 6.2M citations

92% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202397
2022317
20216,115
20205,342
20194,754
20184,357