ICM Partners

About: ICM Partners is a based out in . It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Breast cancer. The organization has 1311 authors who have published 1521 publications receiving 33745 citations. The organization is also known as: International Creative Management Partners.

Dual targeting of HER1/EGFR and HER2 with cetuximab and trastuzumab in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine failure: results of the “THERAPY”phase 1-2 trial

Abstract: To improve treatment efficacy, we decided to simultaneously target HER1 and HER2 with trastuzumab and cetuximab. Following promising preclinical results, we conducted a phase 1-2 trial in advanced pancreatic cancer patients after first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy failure. In this single-arm, non-randomized, multicenter trial, patients received weekly cetuximab (400mg/m², then 250mg/m²). They were sequentially included in two trastuzumab dose levels: 3.0 or 4.0mg/kg, then 1.5 or 2.0mg/kg/weekly. Endpoints were the objective response rate, safety, progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). During phase 1 (n=10 patients), toxicities were evenly distributed except for skin toxicities that frequently caused compliance issues. The higher dose level was defined as the trastuzumab recommended dose. During phase 2 (n=39 patients), toxicities were mainly cutaneous reactions and asthenia. No objective response was observed. Nine patients were stabilized but arrested treatment due to toxicity. Median PFS was 1.8 months (95%CI: 1.7-2.0 months) and median OS was 4.6 months (95%CI: 2.7-6.6 months). Both were positively correlated with skin toxicity severity (P=0.027 and P=0.001, respectively). Conventional phase 1 dose-escalation schedules are unsuitable for targeted therapies because most cutaneous toxicities are not considered dose-limiting toxicities. The compliance issues caused by skin toxicities were particularly detrimental because of the toxicity-response correlation.

Evaluation of amyloid status in a cohort of elderly individuals with memory complaints: validation of the method of quantification and determination of positivity thresholds

Abstract: Our aim is to validate the process steps implemented by the French CATI platform to assess amyloid status, obtained from 18F-Florbetapir PET scans, in a cohort of 318 cognitively normal subjects participating in the INSIGHT-preAD study. Our objective was to develop a method with partial volume effect correction (PVEC) on untransformed PET images, using an automated pipeline (“RACHEL”) adapted to large series of patients and including quality checks of results. We compared RACHEL using different options (with and without PVEC, different sets of regions of interest), to two other methods validated in the literature, referred as the “AVID” and “CAEN” methods. A standard uptake value ratio (SUVR) was obtained with the different methods for participants to another French study, IMAP, including 26 normal elderly controls (NEC), 11 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and 16 patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). We determined two cutoffs for RACHEL method by linear correlation with the other methods and applied them to the INSIGHT-preAD subjects. RACHEL including PVEC and a combination of the whole cerebellum and the pons as a reference region allowed the best discrimination between NEC and AD participants. A strong linear correlation was found between RACHEL and the other two methods and yielded the two cutoffs of 0.79 and 0.88. According to the more conservative threshold, 19.8% of the INSIGHT-preAD subjects would be considered amyloid positive, and 27.7% according to the more liberal threshold. With our method, we clearly discriminated between NEC with negative amyloid status and patients with clinical AD. Using a linear correlation with other validated cutoffs, we could infer our own positivity thresholds and apply them to an independent population. This method might be useful to the community, especially when the optimal cutoff could not be obtained from a population of healthy young adults or from correlation with post-mortem results.

A recessive Nav1.4 mutation underlies congenital myasthenic syndrome with periodic paralysis

Abstract: Objective: To determine the molecular basis of a complex phenotype of congenital muscle weakness observed in an isolated but consanguineous patient. Methods: The proband was evaluated clinically and neurophysiologically over a period of 15 years. Genetic testing of candidate genes was performed. Functional characterization of the candidate mutation was done in mammalian cell background using whole cell patch clamp technique. Results: The proband had fatigable muscle weakness characteristic of congenital myasthenic syndrome with acute and reversible attacks of most severe muscle weakness as observed in periodic paralysis. We identified a novel homozygous SCN4A mutation (p.R1454W) linked to this recessively inherited phenotype. The p.R1454W substitution induced an important enhancement of fast and slow inactivation, a slower recovery for these inactivated states, and a frequency-dependent regulation of Na v 1.4 channels in the heterologous expression system. Conclusion: We identified a novel loss-of-function mutation of Na v 1.4 that leads to a recessive phenotype combining clinical symptoms and signs of congenital myasthenic syndrome and periodic paralysis, probably by decreasing channel availability for muscle action potential genesis at the neuromuscular junction and propagation along the sarcolemma.

Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic renal cancer (mRCC): Update on Carmena trial with focus on intermediate IMDC-risk population.

Abstract: 4508Background: Carmena was a randomized phase III trial, testing the benefit of CN followed by sunitinib (arm A) vs sunitinib alone (arm B), with stratification by MSKCC risk groups in 450 mRCC pa...

Under-treatment of elderly patients with ovarian cancer: a population based study

Abstract: Ovarian cancer is the fourth most common cancer among women in France, and mainly affects the elderly. The primary objective of this study was to compare treatment of ovarian cancer according to age. All patients with invasive cancer (n = 1151) diagnosed between 1997 and 2011 in the Herault Department of southern France were included. Demographic data (age, area of residence), cancer characteristics (stage, histology, grade) and treatment modality (type, period and location of treatment) were analysed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to compare treatment by age. Ovarian cancer was less treated in elderly compared to younger patients, regardless of the type of treatment. This difference was more pronounced for chemotherapy, and was maximal for surgery followed by chemotherapy (odds ratio (OR) for surgery for patients aged >70 vs those aged 70 vs 70 vs <70 = 0.14 [0.08–0.28]). This effect of age was independent of other variables, including stage and grade. The probability of receiving standard treatment, in accordance with recommendations, was reduced by 50 % in elderly patients compared to their younger counterparts. Overall and net survival of elderly patients with standard treatment was similar to those of younger patients treated outside standard treatment. Elderly women with ovarian cancer were therapeutically disadvantaged compared to younger women. Further studies including co morbidities are necessary to refine these results and to improve therapeutic management of elderly patients with ovarian cancer.