International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

About: International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources is a nonprofit organization based out in Dhaka, Bangladesh. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Biodiversity & Population. The organization has 1317 authors who have published 1870 publications receiving 97588 citations.

Framework and guidelines for implementing the proposed IUCN Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (EICAT)

Abstract: Recently, Blackburn et al. (2014) developed a simple, objective and transparent method for classifying alien taxa in terms of the magnitude of their detrimental environmental impacts in recipient areas. Here, we present a comprehensive framework and guidelines for implementing this method, which we term the Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa, or EICAT. We detail criteria for applying the EICAT scheme in a consistent and comparable fashion, prescribe the supporting information that should be supplied along with classifications, and describe the process for implementing the method. This comment aims to draw the attention of interested parties to the framework and guidelines, and to present them in their entirety in a location where they are freely accessible to any potential users.

Global Priorities for Marine Biodiversity Conservation

Abstract: In recent decades, many marine populations have experienced major declines in abundance, but we still know little about where management interventions may help protect the highest levels of marine biodiversity. We used modeled spatial distribution data for nearly 12,500 species to quantify global patterns of species richness and two measures of endemism. By combining these data with spatial information on cumulative human impacts, we identified priority areas where marine biodiversity is most and least impacted by human activities, both within Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) and Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction (ABNJ). Our analyses highlighted places that are both accepted priorities for marine conservation like the Coral Triangle, as well as less well-known locations in the southwest Indian Ocean, western Pacific Ocean, Arctic and Antarctic Oceans, and within semi-enclosed seas like the Mediterranean and Baltic Seas. Within highly impacted priority areas, climate and fishing were the biggest stressors. Although new priorities may arise as we continue to improve marine species range datasets, results from this work are an essential first step in guiding limited resources to regions where investment could best sustain marine biodiversity.

Protected areas for the 21st century: working to provide benefits to society

Abstract: Since the first national park was created at Yellowstone in the USA in 1872, over 8500 protected areas have been established worldwide. Virtually all countries have seen the wisdom of protecting areas of outstanding importance to society, and such sites now cover over 5% of Earth's land surface. However, many of these protected areas exist only on paper, not on the ground. Most are suffering from a combination of threats, including pollution, over-exploitation, encroachment, poaching, and many others. In a period of growing demands on resources and shrinking government budgets, new approaches are required to ensure that protected areas can continue to make their contributions to society. First and foremost, protected areas must be designed and managed in order to provide tangible and intangible benefits to society. This will involve integrating protected areas into larger planning and management frameworks, linking protected areas to biodiversity and climate change, promoting greater financial support for protected areas, and expanding international cooperation in the finance, development and management of protected areas.

Extinction risk and conservation of the world's sharks and rays

Abstract: The rapid expansion of human activities threatens ocean-wide biodiversity loss. Numerous marine animal populations have declined, yet it remains unclear whether these trends are symptomatic of a chronic accumulation of global marine extinction risk. We present the first systematic analysis of threat for a globally-distributed lineage of 1,041 chondrichthyan fishes - sharks, rays, and chimaeras. We estimate that one-quarter are threatened according to IUCN Red List criteria due to overfishing (targeted and incidental). Large-bodied, shallow-water species are at greatest risk and five out of the seven most threatened families are rays. Overall chondrichthyan extinction risk is substantially higher than for most other vertebrates, and only one-third of species are considered safe. Population depletion has occurred throughout the world's ice-free waters, but is particularly prevalent in the Indo-Pacific Biodiversity Triangle and Mediterranean Sea. Improved management of fisheries and trade is urgently needed to avoid extinctions and promote population recovery.

Value of the IUCN Red List

Abstract: 1 Royama, T. (1992) Analytical Population Dynamics, Chapman & Hall2 Johst, K. and Wissel, C. (1997) Extinction risk in a temporallycorrelated environment. Theor. Popul. Biol. 52, 91–1003 McCarthy, M. and Lindenmayer, D.B. (2000) Spatially correlatedextinction in a metapopulation model of Leadbeater’s Possum. Biodiv.Conserv. 9, 47–634 Engen, S. et al. (2002) Migration and spatiotemporal variation inpopulation dynamics in a heterogeneous environment. Ecology 83,570–5795 Engen, S. et al. (2002) The spatial scale of population fluctuation andquasi-extinction risk. Am. Nat. 160, 439–4516 Gonzalez, A. and Holt, R.D. (2002) The inflationary effects ofenvironmental fluctuations in source–sink systems. Proc. Natl.Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 14872–148777 Pulliam, H.R. (1988) Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am.Nat. 132, 652–6618 Dias, P.C. (1996) Sources and sinks in population biology. Trends Ecol.Evol. 11, 326–3309 Faaborg, J. et al. (1998) Understanding fragmented midwestern land-scapes: the future. In Avian Conservation: Research and Management(Marzluff, J.M. and Sallabanks, R., eds) pp. 193–207, Island Press10 Murphy, M.T. (2001) Source-sink dynamics of a declining EasternKingbird population and the value of sink habitats. Conserv. Biol. 15,737–74811 Holt, R.D. et al. Impacts of environmental variability in openpopulations and communities: inflation in sink environments. Theor.Popul. Biol. (in press)12 Pulliam, H.R. and Danielson, B.J. (1991) Sources, sinks and habitatselection: a landscape perspective on population dynamics. Am. Nat.137, S50–S6613 Baillie, S.R. et al. (2000) Consequences of large-scale processes for theconservation of bird populations. J. Appl. Ecol. 37, 88–10214 Gundersen, G. et al. (2001) Source-sink dynamics: how sinks affectdemography of sources. Ecol. Lett. 4, 14–2115 Harrison, S. et al. (1988) Distribution of the bay checkerspot butterfly,Euphydryas editha bayensis: evidence for a metapopulations model.Am. Nat. 132, 360–38216 Stacey, P.B. and Taper, M. (1992) Environmental variation and thepersistence of small populations. Ecol. Appl. 2, 18–2917 Wootton, J.T. and Bell, D.A. (1992) A metapopulation model of theperegrine falcon in California: viability and management strategies.Ecol. Appl. 2, 307–32118 Harrison, S. (1991) Local extinction in a metapopulation context: anempirical evaluation. In Metapopulation dynamics: Empirical andTheoreticalInvestigations(Gilpin,M.E.andHanski,I.,eds)pp.73–88,Academic Press19 Thomas, C.D. and Kunin, W.E. (1999) The spatial structure ofpopulations. J. Anim. Ecol. 68, 647–65720 Paradis, E. et al. (1999) Dispersal and spatial scale affect synchrony inspatial population dynamics. Ecol. Lett. 2, 114–12021 Stacey, P.B. et al. (1997) Migration within metapopulations: theimpacts upon local population dynamics. In Metapopulation Biology:Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution (Hanski, I. and Gilpin, M.E., eds)pp. 267–291, Academic Press22 Schiegg, K. et al. (2002) The consequences of disrupted dispersal infragmented red-cockaded woodpecker populations. J. Anim. Ecol. 71,710–72123 Matthysen, E. et al. (2001) Local recruitment of great and blue tits(Parus major, P. caeruleus) in relation to study plot size and degree ofisolation. Ecography 24, 33–4224 Hudson, P.J. and Cattadori, I.M. (1999) The Moran effect: a cause ofpopulation synchrony. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 1–225 Earn, D.J.D. et al. (1998) Persistence, chaos and synchrony in ecologyand epidemiology. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 265, 7–10