scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

NonprofitDhaka, Bangladesh
About: International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources is a nonprofit organization based out in Dhaka, Bangladesh. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Biodiversity & Population. The organization has 1317 authors who have published 1870 publications receiving 97588 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A set of four criteria, based on the hypothesis that ecosystem risk is a function of the risk of its component species, are proposed and are the first steps in an international consultation process that will lead to a unified proposal to be presented at the next World Conservation Congress in 2012.
Abstract: The potential for conservation of individual species has been greatly advanced by the International Union for Conservation of Nature's (IUCN) development of objective, repeatable, and transparent criteria for assessing extinction risk that explicitly separate risk assessment from priority setting. At the IV World Conservation Congress in 2008, the process began to develop and implement comparable global standards for ecosystems. A working group established by the IUCN has begun formulating a system of quantitative categories and criteria, analogous to those used for species, for assigning levels of threat to ecosystems at local, regional, and global levels. A final system will require definitions of ecosystems; quantification of ecosystem status; identification of the stages of degradation and loss of ecosystems; proxy measures of risk (criteria); classification thresholds for these criteria; and standardized methods for performing assessments. The system will need to reflect the degree and rate of change in an ecosystem's extent, composition, structure, and function, and have its conceptual roots in ecological theory and empirical research. On the basis of these requirements and the hypothesis that ecosystem risk is a function of the risk of its component species, we propose a set of four criteria: recent declines in distribution or ecological function, historical total loss in distribution or ecological function, small distribution combined with decline, or very small distribution. Most work has focused on terrestrial ecosystems, but comparable thresholds and criteria for freshwater and marine ecosystems are also needed. These are the first steps in an international consultation process that will lead to a unified proposal to be presented at the next World Conservation Congress in 2012.

173 citations

Book
01 Jan 2012
TL;DR: In this paper, the state and condition of intertidal habitats along the East Asian-Australasian Flyway (EAAF) were assessed in response to growing concerns expressed by IUCN members over observed declines in biodiversity, the loss of ecological services, and an increase in ecological disasters.
Abstract: The IUCN Species Survival Commission and IUCN Asia Regional Office commissioned this independent report to assess the state and condition of intertidal habitats along the East Asian-Australasian Flyway (EAAF), in response to growing concerns expressed by IUCN members over observed declines in biodiversity, the loss of ecological services, and an increase in ecological disasters. This report is a situation analysis, and it seeks to gather in one place the relevant data and analyses, and to present as clear a picture of the status of the intertidal zone in the EAAF as the data allow. By intention, this report makes no recommendations, but it should serve as a resource for those stakeholders empowered to make or influence decisions and policies in the region.

173 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Implementing the development and implementation of the IUCN Red List Index with a new sampled approach will greatly increase understanding of the status of the world's biodiversity by 2010, enabling the first assessment of a number of key groups.
Abstract: The world's governments have identified reducing the rate of biodiversity loss as a global priority. However, we lack robust measures of progress toward this target. Developing indicators that are generally representative of trends in global biodiversity has presented the scientific community with a significant challenge. Here we discuss the development and implementation of the IUCN Red List Index with a new sampled approach, permitting the assessment of the conservation status and trends of large, speciose taxonomic groups. This approach is based on the IUCN Red List and measures trends in extinction risk through time. The challenges in developing this new approach are addressed, including determining the species groups to be included in the index, identifying the minimum adequate samples size, and aggregating and weighting the index. Implementing this approach will greatly increase understanding of the status of the world's biodiversity by 2010, enabling the first assessment of a number of key groups.

173 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a general framework for incorporating biodiversity concerns into national REDD+ programs based on well-established ecological principles and experiences is proposed, and a three-tiered approach is proposed for biodiversity assessment, where lower tiers can provide a realistic starting point for countries with fewer data and lower technical capacities.

172 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: To improve their clarity and increase their repeatability, the IUCN is recommended to increase communication and information exchange among countries and between regional and global assessors, to facilitate the development of national red lists and to improve their conservation value within and between countries.
Abstract: As countries worldwide become increasingly interested in conserving biodiversity, the profile of national threatened species lists expands and these lists become more influential in determining conserva- tion priorities. The World Conservation Union (IUCN) Categories and Criteria for evaluating extinction risk, originally intended for use at the global level, are increasingly being used at the national level. To facilitate this process, the IUCN recently published guidelines for the application of the criteria at subglobal levels. We evaluated the application of these guidelines, focusing on the opinions and experience of the global community of national assessors. To assess the extent to which IUCN criteria have been used in official national listing efforts, we sent a survey to 180 Convention on Biological Diversity national focal points designated by gov- ernments. Of the respondents, 77% had developed national threatened species lists. Of these, 78% applied a version of the IUCN criteria, and 88% plan to produce future threatened species lists. The majority of this last group (83%) will use IUCN criteria. Of the countries that have or will develop a threatened species list, 82% incorporated their list or the IUCN criteria into national conservation strategies. We further explored the issues highlighted by the survey results by integrating the experience of assessors that have produced national lists. Most of the problems national assessors faced when applying the IUCN criteria arose when the criteria were applied at the regional level without the IUCN Regional Guidelines and when assessors were confused about the purpose of the IUCN criteria and lacked training in their proper use. To improve their clarity and increase their repeatability, we recommend that the IUCN increase communication and information exchange among countries and between regional and global assessors, potentially through an interactive Web site, to facilitate the development of national red lists and to improve their conservation value within and between countries.

172 citations


Authors

Showing all 1320 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Kevin M. Smith114171178470
Ary A. Hoffmann11390755354
David W. Macdonald111110951334
Michael R. Hoffmann10950063474
Fred W. Allendorf8623034738
Edward B. Barbier8445036753
James J. Yoo8149127738
Michael William Bruford8036923635
James E. M. Watson7446123362
Brian Huntley7422528875
Brian W. Bowen7418117451
Gordon Luikart7219337564
Stuart H. M. Butchart7224526585
Thomas M. Brooks7121533724
Joshua E. Cinner6817714384
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Wildlife Conservation Society
4.9K papers, 243.8K citations

86% related

The Nature Conservancy
3.7K papers, 202K citations

83% related

Zoological Society of London
3.7K papers, 201.2K citations

82% related

Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
5.9K papers, 363.9K citations

82% related

Smithsonian Institution
10.3K papers, 415.7K citations

81% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20229
2021201
2020177
2019171
2018131
2017145