Institution
International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources
Nonprofit•Dhaka, Bangladesh•
About: International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources is a nonprofit organization based out in Dhaka, Bangladesh. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Biodiversity & Population. The organization has 1317 authors who have published 1870 publications receiving 97588 citations.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources1, Florida International University2, University of Antioquia3, National University of San Marcos4, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul5, Pontifical Xavierian University6, Alexander von Humboldt Biological Resources Research Institute7, National University of Colombia8, Central University of Ecuador9, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador10, Universidad del Tolima11
TL;DR: Marcelo F. Tognelli as discussed by the authors | Elizabeth P. Anderson | Luz F. Jiménez-Segura | Junior Chuctaya | Luisa Chocano | Javier A. Velásquez | Francisco A. Villa-Navarro
Abstract: Marcelo F. Tognelli | Elizabeth P. Anderson | Luz F. Jiménez‐Segura | Junior Chuctaya | Luisa Chocano | Javier A. Maldonado‐Ocampo | Lina Mesa‐Salazar | José I. Mojica | Fernando M. Carvajal‐Vallejos | Vanessa Correa | Hernán Ortega | Juan F. Rivadeneira Romero | Paula Sánchez‐Duarte | Neil A. Cox | Max Hidalgo | Pedro Jiménez Prado | Carlos A. Lasso | Jaime Sarmiento | Miguel A. Velásquez | Francisco A. Villa‐Navarro
22 citations
••
TL;DR: It is found that 90% of the palm taxa of the West Indies are endemic; some are currently the subject of ex situ and in situ conservation projects in the region’s botanical gardens.
Abstract: The conservation status of 134 species, sub- species and varieties of West Indian palms (Arecaceae) is assessed and reviewed, based on field studies and current literature. We find that 90% of the palm taxa of the West Indies are endemic. Using the IUCN Red List categories one species is categorized as Extinct, 11 taxa as Critically Endangered, 19 as Endangered, and 21 as Vulnerable. Fifty-seven taxa are classified as Least Concern. Twenty-five taxa are Data Deficient, an indica- tion that additional field studies are urgently needed. The 11 Critically Endangered taxa warrant immediate conservation action; some are currently the subject of ex situ and in situ conservation projects in the region's botanical gardens. We recommend that preliminary conservation assessments be made of the 25 Data Deficient taxa so that conservation measures can be implemented for those facing imminent threats.
21 citations
••
21 citations
•
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais1, University of Cambridge2, BirdLife International3, Conservation International4, Wildlife Conservation Society of Tanzania5, World Wide Fund for Nature6, University of York7, Wildlife Conservation Society8, University of Copenhagen9, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources10, Natural History Museum11
21 citations
••
Newcastle University1, Sapienza University of Rome2, University of Tasmania3, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources4, University of the Philippines Los Baños5, Imperial College London6, BirdLife International7, Zoological Society of London8, University of Montpellier9, University of Huelva10, Mammal Research Institute11, Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust12, University of Sydney13, Charles Darwin Foundation14, University of Queensland15, Charles Darwin University16, University of Kent17, Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust18, Colorado State University19, Manchester Metropolitan University20, Cornell University21, Ghent University22, Wildlife Conservation Society23, Spanish National Research Council24, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz25, University of Melbourne26, Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research27, Pontifical Xavierian University28, Botanic Gardens Conservation International29, Texas A&M University30, Endangered Wildlife Trust31, National Autonomous University of Mexico32, International Institute of Minnesota33, University College London34, University of Cambridge35
TL;DR: It is found that conservation prevented 21–32 bird and 7–16 mammal extinctions since 1993, and 9–18 bird and 2–7 mammal extinction since 2010, and future biodiversity action needs to be scaled up to avert additional extinctions.
Abstract: Aichi Target 12 of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) aims to ‘prevent extinctions of known threatened species’. To measure its success, we used a Delphi expert elicitation method to estimate the number of bird and mammal species whose extinctions were prevented by conservation action in 1993 - 2020 (the lifetime of the CBD) and 2010 - 2020 (the timing of Aichi Target 12). We found that conservation prevented 21–32 bird and 7–16 mammal extinctions since 1993, and 9–18 bird and 2–7 mammal extinctions since 2010. Many remain highly threatened, and may still become extinct in the near future. Nonetheless, given that ten bird and five mammal species did go extinct (or are strongly suspected to) since 1993, extinction rates would have been 2.9–4.2 times greater without conservation action. While policy commitments have fostered significant conservation achievements, future biodiversity action needs to be scaled up to avert additional extinctions.
21 citations
Authors
Showing all 1320 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Kevin M. Smith | 114 | 1711 | 78470 |
Ary A. Hoffmann | 113 | 907 | 55354 |
David W. Macdonald | 111 | 1109 | 51334 |
Michael R. Hoffmann | 109 | 500 | 63474 |
Fred W. Allendorf | 86 | 230 | 34738 |
Edward B. Barbier | 84 | 450 | 36753 |
James J. Yoo | 81 | 491 | 27738 |
Michael William Bruford | 80 | 369 | 23635 |
James E. M. Watson | 74 | 461 | 23362 |
Brian Huntley | 74 | 225 | 28875 |
Brian W. Bowen | 74 | 181 | 17451 |
Gordon Luikart | 72 | 193 | 37564 |
Stuart H. M. Butchart | 72 | 245 | 26585 |
Thomas M. Brooks | 71 | 215 | 33724 |
Joshua E. Cinner | 68 | 177 | 14384 |