scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

NonprofitDhaka, Bangladesh
About: International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources is a nonprofit organization based out in Dhaka, Bangladesh. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Biodiversity & Population. The organization has 1317 authors who have published 1870 publications receiving 97588 citations.


Papers
More filters
01 Jan 2002
TL;DR: Bryant et al. as mentioned in this paper reported that only 6% of the remaining forest cover in the tropics is still found in large, contiguous tracts, and the same report lists eight producer countries and most consumer countries in which virtually all the forest estate is in fragmented, modified blocks.
Abstract: Reality is oen quite different. Deforestation and forest degradation have altered many of the world’s tropical forest landscapes to such a degree that—according to a report by Bryant et al. ()—only  of remaining forest cover, or  of original forest cover, in the tropics is still found in large, contiguous tracts. e same report lists eight  producer countries (and most  consumer countries) in which virtually all the forest estate is in fragmented, modified blocks.

22 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Apr 2016-Oryx
TL;DR: The Sumatran rhinoceros Dicerorhinus sumatrensis is one of the rarest large mammals and the species faces extinction despite decades of conservation efforts as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: The Critically Endangered Sumatran rhinoceros Dicerorhinus sumatrensis formerly ranged across South-east Asia. Hunting and habitat loss have made it one of the rarest large mammals and the species faces extinction despite decades of conservation efforts. The number of individuals remaining is unknown as a consequence of inadequate methods and lack of funds for the intensive field work required to estimate the population size of this rare and solitary species. However, all information indicates that numbers are low and declining. A few individuals persist in Borneo, and three tiny populations remain on the Indonesian island of Sumatra and show evidence of breeding. Rhino Protection Units are deployed at all known breeding sites but poaching and a presumed low breeding rate remain major threats. Protected areas have been created for the rhinoceros and other in situ conservation efforts have increased but the species has continued to go locally extinct across its range. Conventional captive breeding has also proven difficult; from a total of 45 Sumatran rhinoceros taken from the wild since 1984 there were no captive births until 2001. Since then only two pairs have been actively bred in captivity, resulting in four births, three by the same pair at the Cincinnati Zoo and one at the Sumatran Rhino Sanctuary in Sumatra, with the sex ratio skewed towards males. To avoid extinction it will be necessary to implement intensive management zones, manage the metapopulation as a single unit, and develop advanced reproductive techniques as a matter of urgency. Intensive census efforts are ongoing in Bukit Barisan Selatan but elsewhere similar efforts remain at the planning stage.

22 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results showed that the elevated littoral fringe was more crowded with crabs, but was less favourable in terms of food availability and environmental conditions.
Abstract: The spatial distribution of mangrove crabs has been commonly associated with tree zonation and abiotic factors such as ground temperature and soil granulometry. Conversely, no studies were designed to investigate the role of competition for resources and predation in shaping crab distribution in mangroves, despite these biotic factors are recognised as key determinants for spatial patterns observed in the communities colonising rocky and sandy intertidal habitats.We studied floral and faunal assemblages in two zones of a Sri Lankan mangrove, a man-made upper intertidal level and a natural eulittoral, mid-shore one. Leaf choice experiments were designed to study both feeding rate and intra and inter-specific interactions for food of sesarmid crabs in the two habitats in order to better understand crab spatial distribution. The two intertidal belts differed in terms of floral composition and crab species abundance. The eulittoral zone was strongly dominated by Neosarmatium smithi, while within the elevated littoral fringe four sesarmids (N. smithi, N. asiaticum, N. malabaricum and Muradium tetragonum) were more evenly distributed. At both levels, all sesarmids showed to collect significantly more Bruguiera spp. and Rhizophora apiculata leaves than Excoecaria agallocha ones. There was no temporal segregation in feeding activity among the four species, resulting in a high interference competition for leaves. Regardless of the habitat, N. smithi was always successful in winning inter-specific fights. Our results showed that the elevated littoral fringe was more crowded with crabs, but was less favourable in terms of food availability and environmental conditions. The dominance of N. smithi in gathering mangrove leaves suggests that this species may segregate the other sesarmids into less favourable habitats. The present data strongly suggest for the first time that interference competition for food can contribute to shape mangrove crab spatial distribution.

22 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Nov 2020-Ecology
TL;DR: As carnivores play key roles in trophic interactions, a better understanding of their distribution and habitat requirements are essential to establish conservation management plans and safeguard the future ecological health of Neotropical ecosystems.
Abstract: Mammalian carnivores are considered a key group in maintaining ecological health and can indicate potential ecological integrity in landscapes where they occur. Carnivores also hold high conservation value and their habitat requirements can guide management and conservation plans. The order Carnivora has 84 species from 8 families in the Neotropical region: Canidae; Felidae; Mephitidae; Mustelidae; Otariidae; Phocidae; Procyonidae; and Ursidae. Herein, we include published and unpublished data on native terrestrial Neotropical carnivores (Canidae; Felidae; Mephitidae; Mustelidae; Procyonidae; and Ursidae). NEOTROPICAL CARNIVORES is a publicly available data set that includes 99,605 data entries from 35,511 unique georeferenced coordinates. Detection/non-detection and quantitative data were obtained from 1818 to 2018 by researchers, governmental agencies, non-governmental organizations, and private consultants. Data were collected using several methods including camera trapping, museum collections, roadkill, line transect, and opportunistic records. Literature (peer-reviewed and grey literature) from Portuguese, Spanish and English were incorporated in this compilation. Most of the data set consists of detection data entries (n = 79,343; 79.7%) but also includes non-detection data (n = 20,262; 20.3%). Of those, 43.3% also include count data (n = 43,151). The information available in NEOTROPICAL CARNIVORES will contribute to macroecological, ecological, and conservation questions in multiple spatio-temporal perspectives. As carnivores play key roles in trophic interactions, a better understanding of their distribution and habitat requirements are essential to establish conservation management plans and safeguard the future ecological health of Neotropical ecosystems. Our data paper, combined with other large-scale data sets, has great potential to clarify species distribution and related ecological processes within the Neotropics. There are no copyright restrictions and no restriction for using data from this data paper, as long as the data paper is cited as the source of the information used. We also request that users inform us of how they intend to use the data.

22 citations


Authors

Showing all 1320 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Kevin M. Smith114171178470
Ary A. Hoffmann11390755354
David W. Macdonald111110951334
Michael R. Hoffmann10950063474
Fred W. Allendorf8623034738
Edward B. Barbier8445036753
James J. Yoo8149127738
Michael William Bruford8036923635
James E. M. Watson7446123362
Brian Huntley7422528875
Brian W. Bowen7418117451
Gordon Luikart7219337564
Stuart H. M. Butchart7224526585
Thomas M. Brooks7121533724
Joshua E. Cinner6817714384
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Wildlife Conservation Society
4.9K papers, 243.8K citations

86% related

The Nature Conservancy
3.7K papers, 202K citations

83% related

Zoological Society of London
3.7K papers, 201.2K citations

82% related

Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
5.9K papers, 363.9K citations

82% related

Smithsonian Institution
10.3K papers, 415.7K citations

81% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20229
2021201
2020177
2019171
2018131
2017145