Institution
International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources
Nonprofit•Dhaka, Bangladesh•
About: International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources is a nonprofit organization based out in Dhaka, Bangladesh. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Biodiversity & Population. The organization has 1317 authors who have published 1870 publications receiving 97588 citations.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden1, Chinese Academy of Sciences2, University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus3, Tallinn University4, University of Oxford5, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology6, Macquarie University7, Duke University8, World Wide Fund for Nature9, University of Sheffield10, Tsinghua University11, University of Central Asia12, University of British Columbia13, The University of Nottingham Ningbo China14, International Institute of Minnesota15, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources16, Kunming Institute of Zoology17, University of East Anglia18
TL;DR: This first BRI Horizon Scan identifies 11 frontier issues that may have large environmental and social impacts but are not yet recognised and will increase China's participation in international environmental governance.
Abstract: The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) represents the largest infrastructure and development project in human history, and presents risks and opportunities for ecosystems, economies, and communities. Some risks (habitat fragmentation, roadkill) are obvious, however, many of the BRI's largest challenges for development and conservation are not obvious and require extensive consideration to identify. In this first BRI Horizon Scan, we identify 11 frontier issues that may have large environmental and social impacts but are not yet recognised. More generally, the BRI will increase China's participation in international environmental governance. Thus, new cooperative modes of governance are needed to balance geopolitical, societal, and environmental interests. Upgrading and standardising global environmental standards is essential to safeguard ecological systems and human societies.
57 citations
••
International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources1, University of Porto2, Osaka Kyoiku University3, Kyushu University4, Azabu University5, University of Tsukuba6, Tokyo University of Agriculture7, Keio University8, Shinshu University9, Tohoku University10, University of Yamanashi11, Russian Academy of Sciences12, Northern (Arctic) Federal University13, Saint Petersburg State University14, University of Szczecin15, University of Nottingham16, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences17
TL;DR: It is revealed that Unionidae species richness in Far East Asia is 30% higher than previously assumed, counting 43 species (41 native + 2 alien) within two Unionidae subfamilies, the Unioninae (32 + 1) and Gonideinee (9 + 1).
57 citations
••
TL;DR: New information that has become available for 2012–2016, including CITES reports from other African countries, and data on actual exports for three years to 2016 supplied by a freight forwarding company are consolidated to update the figures on the legal trade in lion bones from Africa to East-Southeast Asia in the period 2008–2016.
Abstract: The African lion is the only big cat listed on CITES Appendix II, and the only one for which international commercial trade is legal under CITES. The trade in lion body parts, and especially the contentious trade in bones from South Africa to Asia, has raised concerns spanning continents and cultures. Debates were amplified at the 2016 CITES Conference of the Parties (CoP17) when a proposal to up-list lions to Appendix I was not supported and a compromise to keep them on Appendix II, with a bone trade quota for South Africa, was reached instead. CoP17 underscored a need for further information on the lion bone trade and the consequences for lions across the continent. Legal international trade in bones to Asia, allegedly to supply the substitute 'tiger bone' market, began in South Africa in February 2008 when the first CITES permits were issued. It was initially unclear the degree to which bones were sourced from captive-origin lions, and whether trade was a threat to wild lion populations. Our original assessment of the legal CITES-permitted lion bone trade from South Africa to East-Southeast Asia was for the period 2008-2011 (published 2015). In this paper, we consolidate new information that has become available for 2012-2016, including CITES reports from other African countries, and data on actual exports for three years to 2016 supplied by a freight forwarding company. Thus, we update the figures on the legal trade in lion bones from Africa to East-Southeast Asia in the period 2008-2016. We also contextualise the basis for global concerns by reviewing the history of the trade and its relation to tigers, poaching and wildlife trafficking. CITES permits issued to export bones escalated from ±314y-1 skeletons from 2008-2011, to ±1312y-1 skeletons from 2013-2015. South Africa was the only legal exporter of bones to Asia until 2013 when Namibia issued permits to export skeletons to Vietnam. While CITES permits to export ±5363 skeletons from Africa to Asia from 2008-2015 were issued (99.1% from South Africa; 0.7% from Namibia) (51% for Laos), actual exports were less than stated on the permits. However, information on actual exports from 2014-2016 indicated that >3400 skeletons were exported in that period. In total, >6000 skeletons weighing no less than 70 tonnes have been shipped to East-Southeast Asia since 2008. Since few wild lions are hunted and poached within South African protected areas, skeletons for the legal trade appear to be derived from captive bred lions. However, confirmation of a 116kg shipment from Uganda to Laos, and reports of lion poaching in neighbouring countries, indicate that urgent proactive monitoring and evaluation of the legal and illegal trade is necessary in African lion range states where vulnerable wild lion populations are likely to be adversely affected.
57 citations
••
University of Sassari1, University of Concepción2, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic3, Charles University in Prague4, Forest Research Institute5, University of Freiburg6, University of Florida7, University of Padua8, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina9, University of Vienna10, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources11, University of Salerno12, Northwest A&F University13, Lincoln University (Pennsylvania)14, Charles Darwin Foundation15, ETH Zurich16, Bioversity International17, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research18, National University of Comahue19, University of Bordeaux20, University of Coimbra21, Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra22, CABI23, European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization24, Stellenbosch University25
TL;DR: A workshop was held in 2019 to develop global guidelines for the sustainable use of non-native trees, using the Council of Europe - Bern Convention Code of Conduct on Invasive Alien Trees as a starting point as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: Sustainably managed non-native trees deliver economic and societal benefits with limited risk of spread to adjoining areas. However, some plantations have launched invasions that cause substantial damage to biodiversity and ecosystem services, while others pose substantial threats of causing such impacts. The challenge is to maximise the benefits of non-native trees, while minimising negative impacts and preserving future benefits and options.
A workshop was held in 2019 to develop global guidelines for the sustainable use of non-native trees, using the Council of Europe - Bern Convention Code of Conduct on Invasive Alien Trees as a starting point.
The global guidelines consist of eight recommendations: 1) Use native trees, or non-invasive nonnative trees, in preference to invasive non-native trees; 2) Be aware of and comply with international, national, and regional regulations concerning non-native trees; 3) Be aware of the risk of invasion and consider global change trends; 4) Design and adopt tailored practices for plantation site selection and silvicultural management; 5) Promote and implement early detection and rapid response programmes; 6) Design and adopt tailored practices for invasive non-native tree control, habitat restoration, and for dealing with highly modified ecosystems; 7) Engage with stakeholders on the risks posed by invasive nonnative trees, the impacts caused, and the options for management; and 8) Develop and support global networks, collaborative research, and information sharing on native and non-native trees.
The global guidelines are a first step towards building global consensus on the precautions that should be taken when introducing and planting non-native trees. They are voluntary and are intended to complement statutory requirements under international and national legislation. The application of the global guidelines and the achievement of their goals will help to conserve forest biodiversity, ensure sustainable forestry, and contribute to the achievement of several Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations linked with forest biodiversity.
57 citations
••
01 Jan 1993TL;DR: Cryobiology, or low temperature biology, dictates the authors' ability to successfully store animal germ-plasm, tissues and DNA which will be vital to managing both species and genetic variation.
Abstract: Reproduction is fundamental to the continued existence and success of a species. Therefore, reproductive physiology plays a critical role in the emerging field of conservation biology and the preservation of bio- and genetic-diversity. Cryobiology, or low temperature biology, dictates our ability to successfully store animal germ-plasm, tissues and DNA which will be vital to managing both species and genetic variation. Within each of these disciplines, scientists can wield an arsenal of techniques sometimes categorized under the rather broad terms of “assisted reproduction” or “reproductive biotechnology”. For more than two decades, there has been much speculation and debate about the potential uses of artificial insemination (AI), embryo transfer (ET), in vitro fertilization (IVF) and “frozen zoos” for species conservation. But, preservation of a species requires routine and efficient production of offspring, and most of the pregnancies generated in various wildlife species using assisted reproduction have been one-time events (Wildt et al., 1992a,b). Also, many failed attempts of artificial breeding go unreported (Wildt et al., 1986).
57 citations
Authors
Showing all 1320 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Kevin M. Smith | 114 | 1711 | 78470 |
Ary A. Hoffmann | 113 | 907 | 55354 |
David W. Macdonald | 111 | 1109 | 51334 |
Michael R. Hoffmann | 109 | 500 | 63474 |
Fred W. Allendorf | 86 | 230 | 34738 |
Edward B. Barbier | 84 | 450 | 36753 |
James J. Yoo | 81 | 491 | 27738 |
Michael William Bruford | 80 | 369 | 23635 |
James E. M. Watson | 74 | 461 | 23362 |
Brian Huntley | 74 | 225 | 28875 |
Brian W. Bowen | 74 | 181 | 17451 |
Gordon Luikart | 72 | 193 | 37564 |
Stuart H. M. Butchart | 72 | 245 | 26585 |
Thomas M. Brooks | 71 | 215 | 33724 |
Joshua E. Cinner | 68 | 177 | 14384 |