scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

NonprofitDhaka, Bangladesh
About: International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources is a nonprofit organization based out in Dhaka, Bangladesh. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Biodiversity & Population. The organization has 1317 authors who have published 1870 publications receiving 97588 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Catlin Seaview survey as discussed by the authors introduced a novel framework for large-scale monitoring of coral reefs using high-definition underwater imagery collected using customized underwater vehicles in combination with computer vision and machine learning.
Abstract: Marine ecosystems provide critically important goods and services to society, and hence their accelerated degradation underpins an urgent need to take rapid, ambitious and informed decisions regarding their conservation and management. The capacity, however, to generate the detailed field data required to inform conservation planning at appropriate scales is limited by time and resource consuming methods for collecting and analysing field data at the large scales required. The ‘Catlin Seaview Survey’, described here, introduces a novel framework for large-scale monitoring of coral reefs using high-definition underwater imagery collected using customized underwater vehicles in combination with computer vision and machine learning. This enables quantitative and geo-referenced outputs of coral reef features such as habitat types, benthic composition, and structural complexity (rugosity) to be generated across multiple kilometre-scale transects with a spatial resolution ranging from 2 to 6 m2. The novel application of technology described here has enormous potential to contribute to our understanding of coral reefs and associated impacts by underpinning management decisions with kilometre-scale measurements of reef health. Imagery datasets from an initial survey of 500 km of seascape are freely available through an online tool called the Catlin Global Reef Record. Outputs from the image analysis using the technologies described here will be updated on the online repository as work progresses on each dataset. Case studies illustrate the utility of outputs as well as their potential to link to information from remote sensing. The potential implications of the innovative technologies on marine resource management and conservation are also discussed, along with the accuracy and efficiency of the methodologies deployed. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

69 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, three categories of coral or reef development are recognized: (A) coral reefs develop with characteristic profiles of reef flat and reef slope; (B) corals provide framework but there is no reef growth and no characteristic reef profile; and (C) no true reef development occurs, but mixed coral/phaeophyte communities are attached directly on to old, often non-limestone substrate.
Abstract: The coastline of Oman extends 2000 km from 16.5°N to 26.5°N in the north-west Indian Ocean. Most of it is long, exposed sandy beach or mixed sand and shallow rocky areas subject to severe scour, and there is a seasonal, cold-water upwelling whose influence increases towards the equator. Three areas of the mainland support corals, separated by long stretches of shallow sandy or muddy sublittoral. Three categories of coral or reef development are recognized: (A) coral reefs develop with characteristic profiles of reef flat and reef slope; (B) corals provide framework but there is no reef growth and no characteristic reef profile; and (C) no true reef development occurs, but mixed coral/phaeophyte communities are attached directly on to old, often non-limestone substrate. A and B are common in the north and central regions but are rare in the south. Type C is found in the centre and especially the south where the poor reef development is more typical of marginal, high-latitude coral areas. Ninety-one coral s...

69 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This work is the first to identify the influence of the IUCN Red List on conservation, and studied increased scientific knowledge, raised awareness, access to funding and resource allocation, and increased conservation activity.
Abstract: The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species, a species extinction risk assessment tool, has been guiding conservation efforts for over 5 decades. It is widely assumed to have been instrumental in preventing species from moving closer to extinction and driving recoveries. However, the impact of the IUCN Red List in guiding conservation has not been evaluated. We conducted, transcribed, and coded interviews with experts who use the IUCN Red List across a range of sectors to understand how the list is used in conservation. We developed a theory of change to illustrate how and why change is expected to occur along causal pathways contributing to the long-term goal of the IUCN Red List and an evaluation framework with indicators for measuring the impact of the IUCN Red List in generating scientific knowledge, raising awareness among stakeholders, designating priority conservation sites, allocating funding and resources, influencing development of legislation and policy, and guiding targeted conservation action (key themes). Red-list assessments were the primary input leading to outputs (scientific knowledge, raised awareness), outcomes (better informed priority setting, access to funding and resource availability, improved legislation and policy), and impact (implemented conservation action leading to positive change) that have resulted in achievement of IUCN Red List goals. To explore feasibility of attributing the difference made by the IUCN Red List across themes, we studied increased scientific knowledge, raised awareness, access to funding and resource allocation, and increased conservation activity. The feasibility exploration showed increased scientific knowledge over time identified through positive trends in publications referring to the IUCN Red List in the literature; raised awareness of the list following high IUCN activity identified by peaks in online search activity; an increased proportion of conservation funding bodies requesting IUCN Red List status in the application process; and, based on interviews with Amphibian Specialist Group members, red-list assessments were essential in connecting relevant stakeholders and ensuring conservation action. Although we identified the IUCN Red List as a vital tool in global conservation efforts, it was challenging to measure specific impacts because of its ubiquitous nature. We are the first to identify the influence of the IUCN Red List on conservation.

69 citations

Posted ContentDOI
Alain Maasri1, Alain Maasri2, Sonja C. Jähnig2, Sonja C. Jähnig3, Mihai Adamescu4, Rita Adrian5, Rita Adrian2, Claudio Baigún, Donald J. Baird6, Angelica Batista-Morales7, Núria Bonada8, Lee E. Brown9, Qinghua Cai10, João Vitor Campos-Silva11, Viola Clausnitzer12, Topiltzin Contreras-MacBeath13, Steven J. Cooke14, Thibault Datry, Gonzalo Delacámara15, Luc De Meester5, Luc De Meester2, Luc De Meester16, Klaus-Douwe B. Dijkstra17, Van Tu Do18, Sami Domisch2, David Dudgeon19, Tibor Eros, Hendrik Freitag20, Joerg Freyhof21, Jana Friedrich, Martin Friedrichs-Manthey5, Martin Friedrichs-Manthey2, Juergen Geist22, Mark O. Gessner2, Peter Goethals23, Matthew Gollock24, Christopher P. Gordon25, Hans-Peter Grossart26, Hans-Peter Grossart2, Georges Gulemvuga, Pablo E. Gutiérrez-Fonseca27, Peter Haase12, Peter Haase28, Daniel Hering28, Hans Jürgen Hahn29, Charles P. Hawkins30, Fengzhi He2, Jani Heino31, Virgilio Hermoso, Zeb S. Hogan32, Franz Hölker2, Franz Hölker5, Jonathan M. Jeschke5, Jonathan M. Jeschke2, Meilan Jiang33, Richard K. Johnson34, Gregor Kalinkat2, Bakhtiyor Karimov, Aventino Kasangaki35, Ismael A. Kimirei, Bert Kohlmann36, Mathias Kuemmerlen37, Jan J. Kuiper38, Benjamin Kupilas39, Benjamin Kupilas40, Simone D. Langhans41, Richard Lansdown42, Florian Leese28, Francis S. Magbanua43, Shin-ichiro S. Matsuzaki44, Michael T. Monaghan2, Michael T. Monaghan5, Levan Mumladze45, Javier Muzon, Pierre A. Mvogo Ndongo46, Jens C. Nejstgaard2, Oxana Nikitina, Clifford A. Ochs47, Oghenekaro Nelson Odume48, Jeffrey J. Opperman49, Harmony Patricio, Steffen U. Pauls12, Steffen U. Pauls50, Rajeev Raghavan51, Alonso Ramírez52, Bindiya Rashni53, Vere Ross-Gillespie, Michael J. Samways54, Ralf B. Schäfer29, Astrid Schmidt-Kloiber55, Ole Seehausen56, Ole Seehausen57, Deep Narayan Shah58, Subodh Sharma59, Janne Soininen60, Nike Sommerwerk21, Jason D. Stockwell61, Frank Suhling62, Ram Devi Tachamo Shah59, Rebecca Tharme63, James H. Thorp64, David Tickner, Klement Tockner65, Jonathan D. Tonkin66, Mireia Valle67, Jean Ricardo Simões Vitule68, Martin Volk69, Ding Wang10, Christian Wolter2, Susanne Worischka29 
Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University1, Leibniz Association2, Humboldt University of Berlin3, University of Bucharest4, Free University of Berlin5, University of New Brunswick6, Alexander von Humboldt Biological Resources Research Institute7, University of Barcelona8, University of Leeds9, Chinese Academy of Sciences10, Norwegian University of Life Sciences11, American Museum of Natural History12, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos13, Carleton University14, IMDEA15, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven16, Naturalis17, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology18, University of Hong Kong19, Ateneo de Manila University20, Museum für Naturkunde21, Technische Universität München22, Ghent University23, Zoological Society of London24, University of Ghana25, University of Potsdam26, University of Costa Rica27, University of Duisburg-Essen28, University of Koblenz and Landau29, Utah State University30, Finnish Environment Institute31, University of Nevada, Reno32, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications33, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences34, Kabale University35, EARTH University36, Trinity College, Dublin37, Stockholm Resilience Centre38, University of Münster39, Norwegian Institute for Water Research40, University of Otago41, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources42, University of the Philippines Diliman43, National Institute for Environmental Studies44, Ilia State University45, University of Douala46, University of Mississippi47, Rhodes University48, World Wide Fund for Nature49, University of Giessen50, Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies51, North Carolina State University52, University of the South Pacific53, Stellenbosch University54, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna55, University of Bern56, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology57, Tribhuvan University58, Kathmandu University59, University of Helsinki60, University of Vermont61, Braunschweig University of Technology62, François Rabelais University63, University of Kansas64, Goethe University Frankfurt65, University of Canterbury66, University of California, Santa Barbara67, Federal University of Paraná68, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ69
TL;DR: In this article, the authors identified 15 pressing priority needs, grouped into five research areas, in an effort to support informed stewardship of freshwater biodiversity, and proposed a global biodiversity research agenda aiming to advance freshwater biodiversity research globally.
Abstract: Global freshwater biodiversity is declining dramatically, and meeting the challenges of this crisis requires bold goals and the mobilisation of substantial resources. While the reasons are varied, investments in both research and conservation of freshwater biodiversity lag far behind those in the terrestrial and marine realms. Inspired by a global consultation, we identify 15 pressing priority needs, grouped into five research areas, in an effort to support informed stewardship of freshwater biodiversity. The proposed agenda aims to advance freshwater biodiversity research globally as a critical step in improving coordinated actions towards its sustainable management and conservation.

69 citations


Authors

Showing all 1320 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Kevin M. Smith114171178470
Ary A. Hoffmann11390755354
David W. Macdonald111110951334
Michael R. Hoffmann10950063474
Fred W. Allendorf8623034738
Edward B. Barbier8445036753
James J. Yoo8149127738
Michael William Bruford8036923635
James E. M. Watson7446123362
Brian Huntley7422528875
Brian W. Bowen7418117451
Gordon Luikart7219337564
Stuart H. M. Butchart7224526585
Thomas M. Brooks7121533724
Joshua E. Cinner6817714384
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Wildlife Conservation Society
4.9K papers, 243.8K citations

86% related

The Nature Conservancy
3.7K papers, 202K citations

83% related

Zoological Society of London
3.7K papers, 201.2K citations

82% related

Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
5.9K papers, 363.9K citations

82% related

Smithsonian Institution
10.3K papers, 415.7K citations

81% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20229
2021201
2020177
2019171
2018131
2017145