Institution
University of Amsterdam
Education•Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands•
About: University of Amsterdam is a education organization based out in Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 59309 authors who have published 140894 publications receiving 5984137 citations. The organization is also known as: UvA & Universiteit van Amsterdam.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: Evidence obtained in Experiments 4 and 5 suggests that unconscious thought leads to clearer, more polarized, and more integrated representations in memory.
Abstract: The role of unconscious and conscious thought in decision making was investigated in 5 experiments. Because of the low processing capacity of consciousness, conscious thought was hypothesized to be maladaptive when making complex decisions. Conversely, unconscious thought was expected to be highly effective. In Experiments 1-3, participants were presented with a complex decision problem in which they had to choose between various alternatives, each with multiple attributes. Some participants had to make a decision immediately after being presented with the options. In the conscious thought condition, participants could think about the decision for a few minutes. In the unconscious thought condition, participants were distracted for a few minutes and then indicated their decision. Throughout the experiments, unconscious thinkers made the best decisions. Additional evidence obtained in Experiments 4 and 5 suggests that unconscious thought leads to clearer, more polarized, and more integrated representations in memory.
761 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, a unified and generally applicable treatment for the individual or combined effects of double layer capacitance and faradaic process in a.c. measurements is given for the diffusion coupled with a fast or a first-order slow electrode reaction.
760 citations
••
[...]
TL;DR: In this article, the authors identify the perturbative string states and their interactions, and describe the appearance of D-particle and D-membrane states, and present evidence that supports their identification.
759 citations
••
TL;DR: A comprehensive review of methods to measure soil water content with ground penetrating radar (GPR) is presented in this article, where the authors distinguish four methods: reflected wave velocity, ground wave velocity and surface reflection coefficient.
Abstract: We present a comprehensive review of methods to measure soil water content with ground penetrating radar (GPR) We distinguish four methodologies: soil water content determined from reflected wave velocity, soil water content determined from ground wave velocity, soil water content determined from transmitted wave velocity between boreholes, and soil water content determined from the surface reflection coefficient For each of these four methodologies, we discuss the basic principles, illustrate the quality of the data with field examples, discuss the possibilities and limitations, and identify areas where future research is required We hope that this review will further stimulate the community to consider ground penetrating radar as one of the possible tools to measure soil water content
759 citations
••
California Institute of Technology1, Stockholm School of Economics2, University of Innsbruck3, National University of Singapore4, University of Pennsylvania5, Center for Open Science6, University of Virginia7, Harvard University8, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich9, University of Amsterdam10, Harbin Institute of Technology11
TL;DR: It is found that peer beliefs of replicability are strongly related to replicable, suggesting that the research community could predict which results would replicate and that failures to replicate were not the result of chance alone.
Abstract: Being able to replicate scientific findings is crucial for scientific progress. We replicate 21 systematically selected experimental studies in the social sciences published in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015. The replications follow analysis plans reviewed by the original authors and pre-registered prior to the replications. The replications are high powered, with sample sizes on average about five times higher than in the original studies. We find a significant effect in the same direction as the original study for 13 (62%) studies, and the effect size of the replications is on average about 50% of the original effect size. Replicability varies between 12 (57%) and 14 (67%) studies for complementary replicability indicators. Consistent with these results, the estimated true-positive rate is 67% in a Bayesian analysis. The relative effect size of true positives is estimated to be 71%, suggesting that both false positives and inflated effect sizes of true positives contribute to imperfect reproducibility. Furthermore, we find that peer beliefs of replicability are strongly related to replicability, suggesting that the research community could predict which results would replicate and that failures to replicate were not the result of chance alone.
759 citations
Authors
Showing all 59759 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Richard A. Flavell | 231 | 1328 | 205119 |
Scott M. Grundy | 187 | 841 | 231821 |
Stuart H. Orkin | 186 | 715 | 112182 |
Kenneth C. Anderson | 178 | 1138 | 126072 |
David A. Weitz | 178 | 1038 | 114182 |
Dorret I. Boomsma | 176 | 1507 | 136353 |
Brenda W.J.H. Penninx | 170 | 1139 | 119082 |
Michael Kramer | 167 | 1713 | 127224 |
Nicholas J. White | 161 | 1352 | 104539 |
Lex M. Bouter | 158 | 767 | 103034 |
Wolfgang Wagner | 156 | 2342 | 123391 |
Jerome I. Rotter | 156 | 1071 | 116296 |
David Cella | 156 | 1258 | 106402 |
David Eisenberg | 156 | 697 | 112460 |
Naveed Sattar | 155 | 1326 | 116368 |