Institution
University of Amsterdam
Education•Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands•
About: University of Amsterdam is a education organization based out in Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 59309 authors who have published 140894 publications receiving 5984137 citations. The organization is also known as: UvA & Universiteit van Amsterdam.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven1, University of Sheffield2, Charité3, Medical University of Vienna4, University of Bologna5, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University6, University of Manchester7, University of Lugano8, Netherlands Cancer Institute9, Monash University10, St James's University Hospital11, Erasmus University Medical Center12, University of Aberdeen13, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary14, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust15, Cardiff University16, University of Amsterdam17, University of Lyon18, Utrecht University19, University of Liverpool20
TL;DR: The 2020 EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG guidelines on PCa guidelines summarise the most recent findings and advice for their use in clinical practice and include a strong recommendation to consider moderate hypofractionation in intermediate-risk patients.
1,369 citations
••
TL;DR: This article advances a simple conception of test validity: A test is valid for measuring an attribute if (a) the attribute exists and (b) variations in the attribute causally produce variation in the measurement outcomes.
Abstract: This article advances a simple conception of test validity: A test is valid for measuring an attribute if (a) the attribute exists and (b) variations in the attribute causally produce variation in the measurement outcomes. This conception is shown to diverge from current validity theory in several respects. In particular, the emphasis in the proposed conception is on ontology, reference, and causality, whereas current validity theory focuses on epistemology, meaning, and correlation. It is argued that the proposed conception is not only simpler but also theoretically superior to the position taken in the existing literature. Further, it has clear theoretical and practical implications for validation research. Most important, validation research must not be directed at the relation between the measured attribute and other attributes but at the processes that convey the effect of the measured attribute on the test scores.
1,357 citations
••
Verneri Anttila1, Verneri Anttila2, Brendan Bulik-Sullivan1, Brendan Bulik-Sullivan2 +717 more•Institutions (270)
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that, in the general population, the personality trait neuroticism is significantly correlated with almost every psychiatric disorder and migraine, and it is shown that both psychiatric and neurological disorders have robust correlations with cognitive and personality measures.
Abstract: Disorders of the brain can exhibit considerable epidemiological comorbidity and often share symptoms, provoking debate about their etiologic overlap. We quantified the genetic sharing of 25 brain disorders from genome-wide association studies of 265,218 patients and 784,643 control participants and assessed their relationship to 17 phenotypes from 1,191,588 individuals. Psychiatric disorders share common variant risk, whereas neurological disorders appear more distinct from one another and from the psychiatric disorders. We also identified significant sharing between disorders and a number of brain phenotypes, including cognitive measures. Further, we conducted simulations to explore how statistical power, diagnostic misclassification, and phenotypic heterogeneity affect genetic correlations. These results highlight the importance of common genetic variation as a risk factor for brain disorders and the value of heritability-based methods in understanding their etiology.
1,357 citations
••
Harvard University1, University of Cape Town2, King's College London3, Makerere University4, Johns Hopkins University5, University of Washington6, Emory University7, Carter Center8, University of London9, University of Melbourne10, World Psychiatric Association11, Rutgers University12, Al-Quds University13, Peking University14, University of Amsterdam15, University of Health Sciences Lahore16, Dow University of Health Sciences17, University of Ibadan18, University of Liverpool19, Public Health Foundation of India20, Wellcome Trust21, University of Oxford22, South African Medical Research Council23, Groote Schuur Hospital24
1,356 citations
••
TL;DR: The authors showed that self-categorization, commitment to the group, and group self-esteem are related but separate aspects of group members' social identity, and that these three aspects are differentially related to manipulated group features, as well as displays of ingroup favouritism.
Abstract: The aim of this study is to show that, when examining social identification, it is both possible and important to distinguish between self-categorisation, commitment to the group, and group self-esteem, as related but separate aspects of group members' social identity. This was demonstrated in an experiment (N=119), in which Ingroup Status (high/low), Ingroup Size (majority/minority), and Group Formation (self-selected/assigned group membership) were manipulated orthogonally. The results of this study confirm that these three aspects of social identity can be distinguished as separate factors in a principal components analysis. Furthermore, as predicted, the three aspects are differentially related to manipulated group features, as well as displays of ingroup favouritism. Group members' self-categorisations were only affected by the relative size of the group, while group self-esteem was only influenced by group status. Affective commitment to the group depended both on group status and on the group assignment criterion. Importantly, only the group commitment aspect of social identity mediated displays of ingroup favouritism. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
1,355 citations
Authors
Showing all 59759 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Richard A. Flavell | 231 | 1328 | 205119 |
Scott M. Grundy | 187 | 841 | 231821 |
Stuart H. Orkin | 186 | 715 | 112182 |
Kenneth C. Anderson | 178 | 1138 | 126072 |
David A. Weitz | 178 | 1038 | 114182 |
Dorret I. Boomsma | 176 | 1507 | 136353 |
Brenda W.J.H. Penninx | 170 | 1139 | 119082 |
Michael Kramer | 167 | 1713 | 127224 |
Nicholas J. White | 161 | 1352 | 104539 |
Lex M. Bouter | 158 | 767 | 103034 |
Wolfgang Wagner | 156 | 2342 | 123391 |
Jerome I. Rotter | 156 | 1071 | 116296 |
David Cella | 156 | 1258 | 106402 |
David Eisenberg | 156 | 697 | 112460 |
Naveed Sattar | 155 | 1326 | 116368 |