Emma Heikensten

TL;DR: A large-scale assessment suggests that experimental reproducibility in psychology leaves a lot to be desired, and correlational tests suggest that replication success was better predicted by the strength of original evidence than by characteristics of the original and replication teams.

TL;DR: To contribute data about replicability in economics, 18 studies published in the American Economic Review and the Quarterly Journal of Economics between 2011 and 2014 are replicated, finding that two-thirds of the 18 studies examined yielded replicable estimates of effect size and direction.

TL;DR: It is found that peer beliefs of replicability are strongly related to replicable, suggesting that the research community could predict which results would replicate and that failures to replicate were not the result of chance alone.

TL;DR: This paper replicated 18 studies published in the American Economic Review and the Quarterly Journal of Economics in 2011-2014 and found a significant effect in the same direction as the original study for 11 replications (61%).

TL;DR: This paper2014 was used to assess the quality of research carried out at higher education institutions in the UK over a 6-year period This paper, but the process was criticized for being expensive and bureaucratic, and it was argued that similar information could be obtained more simply from various existing metrics.