scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Toronto

EducationToronto, Ontario, Canada
About: University of Toronto is a education organization based out in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Health care. The organization has 126067 authors who have published 294940 publications receiving 13536856 citations. The organization is also known as: UToronto & U of T.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A generic message-passing algorithm, the sum-product algorithm, that operates in a factor graph, that computes-either exactly or approximately-various marginal functions derived from the global function.
Abstract: Algorithms that must deal with complicated global functions of many variables often exploit the manner in which the given functions factor as a product of "local" functions, each of which depends on a subset of the variables. Such a factorization can be visualized with a bipartite graph that we call a factor graph, In this tutorial paper, we present a generic message-passing algorithm, the sum-product algorithm, that operates in a factor graph. Following a single, simple computational rule, the sum-product algorithm computes-either exactly or approximately-various marginal functions derived from the global function. A wide variety of algorithms developed in artificial intelligence, signal processing, and digital communications can be derived as specific instances of the sum-product algorithm, including the forward/backward algorithm, the Viterbi algorithm, the iterative "turbo" decoding algorithm, Pearl's (1988) belief propagation algorithm for Bayesian networks, the Kalman filter, and certain fast Fourier transform (FFT) algorithms.

6,637 citations

Proceedings Article
06 Jul 2015
TL;DR: An attention based model that automatically learns to describe the content of images is introduced that can be trained in a deterministic manner using standard backpropagation techniques and stochastically by maximizing a variational lower bound.
Abstract: Inspired by recent work in machine translation and object detection, we introduce an attention based model that automatically learns to describe the content of images. We describe how we can train this model in a deterministic manner using standard backpropagation techniques and stochastically by maximizing a variational lower bound. We also show through visualization how the model is able to automatically learn to fix its gaze on salient objects while generating the corresponding words in the output sequence. We validate the use of attention with state-of-the-art performance on three benchmark datasets: Flickr9k, Flickr30k and MS COCO.

6,485 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The use of reliability and validity are common in quantitative research and now it is reconsidered in the qualitative research paradigm as discussed by the authors, which can also illuminate some ways to test or maximize the validity and reliability of a qualitative study.
Abstract: The use of reliability and validity are common in quantitative research and now it is reconsidered in the qualitative research paradigm. Since reliability and validity are rooted in positivist perspective then they should be redefined for their use in a naturalistic approach. Like reliability and validity as used in quantitative research are providing springboard to examine what these two terms mean in the qualitative research paradigm, triangulation as used in quantitative research to test the reliability and validity can also illuminate some ways to test or maximize the validity and reliability of a qualitative study. Therefore, reliability, validity and triangulation, if they are relevant research concepts, particularly from a qualitative point of view, have to be redefined in order to reflect the multiple ways of establishing truth. Key words: Reliability, Validity, Triangulation, Construct, Qualitative, and Quantitative This article discusses the use of reliability and validity in the qualitative research paradigm. First, the meanings of quantitative and qualitative research are discussed. Secondly, reliability and validity as used in quantitative research are discussed as a way of providing a springboard to examining what these two terms mean and how they can be tested in the qualitative research paradigm. This paper concludes by drawing upon the use of triangulation in the two paradigms (quantitative and qualitative) to show how the changes have influenced our understanding of reliability, validity and triangulation in qualitative studies.

6,438 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
16 Feb 2007-Science
TL;DR: A method called “affinity propagation,” which takes as input measures of similarity between pairs of data points, which found clusters with much lower error than other methods, and it did so in less than one-hundredth the amount of time.
Abstract: Clustering data by identifying a subset of representative examples is important for processing sensory signals and detecting patterns in data. Such "exemplars" can be found by randomly choosing an initial subset of data points and then iteratively refining it, but this works well only if that initial choice is close to a good solution. We devised a method called "affinity propagation," which takes as input measures of similarity between pairs of data points. Real-valued messages are exchanged between data points until a high-quality set of exemplars and corresponding clusters gradually emerges. We used affinity propagation to cluster images of faces, detect genes in microarray data, identify representative sentences in this manuscript, and identify cities that are efficiently accessed by airline travel. Affinity propagation found clusters with much lower error than other methods, and it did so in less than one-hundredth the amount of time.

6,429 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Principal component analysis (PCA) as discussed by the authors is a multivariate technique that analyzes a data table in which observations are described by several inter-correlated quantitative dependent variables, and its goal is to extract the important information from the table, to represent it as a set of new orthogonal variables called principal components, and display the pattern of similarity of the observations and of the variables as points in maps.
Abstract: Principal component analysis PCA is a multivariate technique that analyzes a data table in which observations are described by several inter-correlated quantitative dependent variables. Its goal is to extract the important information from the table, to represent it as a set of new orthogonal variables called principal components, and to display the pattern of similarity of the observations and of the variables as points in maps. The quality of the PCA model can be evaluated using cross-validation techniques such as the bootstrap and the jackknife. PCA can be generalized as correspondence analysis CA in order to handle qualitative variables and as multiple factor analysis MFA in order to handle heterogeneous sets of variables. Mathematically, PCA depends upon the eigen-decomposition of positive semi-definite matrices and upon the singular value decomposition SVD of rectangular matrices. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

6,398 citations


Authors

Showing all 127245 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Gordon H. Guyatt2311620228631
David J. Hunter2131836207050
Rakesh K. Jain2001467177727
Thomas C. Südhof191653118007
Gordon B. Mills1871273186451
George Efstathiou187637156228
John P. A. Ioannidis1851311193612
Paul M. Thompson1832271146736
Yusuke Nakamura1792076160313
Chris Sander178713233287
David R. Williams1782034138789
David L. Kaplan1771944146082
Jasvinder A. Singh1762382223370
Hyun-Chul Kim1764076183227
Deborah J. Cook173907148928
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of California, San Diego
204.5K papers, 12.3M citations

96% related

University of Washington
305.5K papers, 17.7M citations

96% related

Stanford University
320.3K papers, 21.8M citations

96% related

Columbia University
224K papers, 12.8M citations

96% related

University of Michigan
342.3K papers, 17.6M citations

95% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023504
20221,822
202119,077
202017,303
201915,388
201814,130