scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers in "Tohoku Mathematical Journal in 1975"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Theorem 2 of Part I for F = H and r = 1 is shown to be false in this paper, which implies that there are at least two types of isoparametric hypersurfaces in S with the same multiplicities; one is homogeneous, and the other is not.
Abstract: Introduction. This paper is a continuation of Part I [13]. In the first half of the present paper, we study the homogeneous isoparametric hyper surf aces in spheres. Every homogeneous hyper surf ace in a sphere is represented as an orbit of a linear isotropy group of a Riemannian symmetric space of rank 2, due to Hsiang-Lawson [8]. In §1, we study the linear isotropy representations of Riemannian symmetric spaces and their orbits in general. §2 and §3 are devoted to a study of the homogeneous isoparametric hyper surf aces, their classification and invariant polynomials. In § 4 and § 5, we construct explicitly the defining polynomial F for each homogeneous isoparametric hypersurface in a sphere, which was done by Cartan [3] in case g — 3. In the second half, we prove that every closed isoparametric hypersurface in a sphere in case g = 4 and m^ or w2 = 2 is homogeneous. Cartan [4] indicated, without proof, that in case g = 4, every closed isoparametric hypersurface in a sphere with the same multiplicities is homogeneous. In case m^ = m2 = 2, we give a brief outline of its proof in §9. In §6, we exhibit explicit forms of {pa, qa] for some of the homogeneous examples. We see that, for a homogeneous isoparametric hypersurface with g = 4, m^ — 4 and m2 = 3, its defining polynomial — F does not satisfy the condition (B) given in § 6 of Part I. Thus one can conclude that our example constructed in Theorem 2 of Part I for F = H and r = 1 is not homogeneous. Consequently, there are at least two types of isoparametric hypersurfaces in S with the same multiplicities; one is homogeneous, and the other is not. It seems to be an interesting problem to seek a local geometric quantity in order to distinguish them.

197 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
Hitoshi Takagi1
TL;DR: In this article, the authors classify conformally flat Riemannian manifolds admitting a transitive group of isometries and give the classification together with Theorem D in Section 4.
Abstract: 1.Introduction. In the present paper, we shall classify conformally flat Riemannian manifolds admitting a transitive group of isometries. This class of manifolds contains the homogeneous Riemannian manifolds of constant curvature classified by J. A. Wolf ([4], [5]). Theorem A in Section 2 imposes a restriction on tie local Riemannian structure of the manifold in consideration. Using Theorem A, we get Theorem B in Section 3 and Theorem C in Section 4. They give the classification together with Theorem D in Section 4. The author wishes to express his sincere thanks to Prof. S. Tanno and Prof. T. sakai who gave him many valuable suggestions and guidantes.

43 citations






Journal ArticleDOI
Kôji Uchida1

25 citations



Journal ArticleDOI

20 citations