scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

An Operational framework for defining and monitoring forest degradation

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the authors suggest that there are types of forest degradation that produce a continuum of decline in provision of ecosystem services, from those in primary forests through various forms of managed forests to deforestation.
Abstract
Forest degradation is broadly defined as a reduction in the capacity of a forest to produce ecosystem services such as carbon storage and wood products as a result of anthropogenic and environmental changes. The main causes of degradation include unsustainable logging, agriculture, invasive species, fire, fuelwood gathering, and livestock grazing. Forest degradation is widespread and has become an important consideration in global policy processes that deal with biodiversity, climate change, and forest management. There is, however, no generally recognized way to identify a degraded forest because perceptions of forest degradation vary depending on the cause, the particular goods or services of interest, and the temporal and spatial scales considered. Here, we suggest that there are types of forest degradation that produce a continuum of decline in provision of ecosystem services, from those in primary forests through various forms of managed forests to deforestation. Forest degradation must be measured against a desired baseline condition, and the types of degradation can be represented using five criteria that relate to the drivers of degradation, loss of ecosystem services and sustainable management, including: productivity, biodiversity, unusual disturbances, protective functions, and carbon storage. These criteria are not meant to be equivalent and some might be considered more important than others, depending on the local forest management objectives. We propose a minimum subset of seven indicators for the five criteria that should be assessed to determine forest degradation under a sustainable ecosystem management regime. The indicators can be remotely sensed (although improving calibration requires ground work) and aggregated from stand to management unit or landscape levels and ultimately to sub-national and national scales.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Classifying drivers of global forest loss

TL;DR: Using satellite imagery, a forest loss classification model is developed to determine a spatial attribution of forest disturbance to the dominant drivers of land cover and land use change over the period 2001 to 2015 and indicates that 27% of global forest loss can be attributed to deforestation through permanent land use changes for commodity production.
Book

Plantation Forests and Biodiversity: Oxymoron or Opportunity?

TL;DR: In this article, a comprehensive review of the function of plantation forests as habitat compared with other land cover, examine the effects on biodiversity at the landscape scale, and synthesise context-specific effects of plantation forestry on biodiversity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Robust monitoring of small-scale forest disturbances in a tropical montane forest using Landsat time series

TL;DR: In this article, a robust data-driven method to track tropical deforestation and degradation based on Landsat time series data is presented, where change magnitude, calculated based on differences between observed and expected values in a monitoring period, was found to be an essential predictor variable for disturbances.
References
More filters

Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

TL;DR: Drafting Authors: Neil Adger, Pramod Aggarwal, Shardul Agrawala, Joseph Alcamo, Abdelkader Allali, Oleg Anisimov, Nigel Arnell, Michel Boko, Osvaldo Canziani, Timothy Carter, Gino Casassa, Ulisses Confalonieri, Rex Victor Cruz, Edmundo de Alba Alcaraz, William Easterling, Christopher Field, Andreas Fischlin, Blair Fitzharris.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Biodiversity

TL;DR: In this article, the authors suggest that the term "fragmentation" should be reserved for the breaking apart of habitat, independent of habitat loss, and that fragmentation per se has much weaker effects on biodiversity that are at least as likely to be positive as negative.
Journal ArticleDOI

Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control

TL;DR: Given their current scale, biotic invasions have taken their place alongside human-driven atmospheric and oceanic alterations as major agents of global change and left unchecked, they will influence these other forces in profound but still unpredictable ways.
Journal ArticleDOI

Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social–ecological Systems

TL;DR: The concept of resilience has evolved considerably since Holling's (1973) seminal paper as discussed by the authors and different interpretations of what is meant by resilience, however, cause confusion, and it can be counterproductive to seek definitions that are too narrow.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (1)
How to monitor and evaluate forest degradation?

The paper suggests using a set of criteria and indicators, including productivity, biodiversity, disturbances, protective functions, and carbon storage, to monitor and evaluate forest degradation.