scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Clinical presentation and outcomes for adult ependymoma patients.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The Adult Ependymoma Outcomes survey uses self‐reported experience to evaluate how this tumor affects patient groups throughout the illness trajectory.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Outcomes projects can be a catalyst for determining disease- and treatment-related consequences for patients with rare tumors. The Adult Ependymoma Outcomes (AEO) survey uses self-reported experience to evaluate how this tumor affects patient groups throughout the illness trajectory. METHODS Patients completed the AEO survey via a Web-based portal. The survey included questions on treatment, tumor recurrence, and current health status; the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor and Spine Tumor modules; and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). RESULTS The sample included 264 participants (57% female) with a median age of 46 years (range, 18-77 years). Radiation treatment was commonly used for patients who had brain involvement (χ2(1) = 20.7; P < .001), underwent a partial resection (43%; χ2(3) = 15.4; P < .001), or had a grade 3 tumor (41%; χ2(2) = 18.8; P < .001). Recurrence occurred in a small group (29%), with grade 1 tumor patients 2.6 times more likely and grade 3 tumor patients 2.5 times more likely to experience recurrence than those with grade 2 tumors. Spine tumor patients had a higher symptom burden (mean, 2.8; scale, 0-10) than brain tumor patients (t(247) = −4.0), and they reported more moderate to severe symptoms (rating ≥ 5; 29%) than their counterparts (18%). Within the physical health portion of the SF-36, spine tumor patients reported worse health with respect to bodily pain (t(249) = 6.8; P < .001), physical functioning (t(252) = 4.1; P < .001), and vitality (t(202.2) = 3.0; P < .003). CONCLUSIONS These results demonstrate the feasibility of implementing outcomes projects that report on the clinical and demographic characteristics of a rare patient population, and they underscore the importance of outcomes data in understanding disease-related issues. Cancer 2016. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

EANO guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of ependymal tumors.

TL;DR: Nine subgroups of ependymal tumors across different anatomical compartments have been identified with distinct genetic and epigenetic alterations, and with distinct outcomes, which may lead to more precise diagnostic and prognostic assessments, molecular subgroup-adapted therapies, and eventually new recommendations pending validation in prospective studies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Recent Advances in the Classification and Treatment of Ependymomas.

TL;DR: There are inconsistent survival outcomes in retrospective studies for ependymomas graded as II versus III, bringing into question the validity of histologic grading which is subject to high interobserver variability in part due to inconsistent application of mitotic count parameters.
Journal ArticleDOI

Review of ependymomas: assessment of consensus in pathological diagnosis and correlations with genetic profiles and outcome

TL;DR: This study indicated that the expert consensus pathological diagnosis could correlate well with the molecular classifications in EPNs and should be diagnosed more carefully by histological and molecular analyses.
Journal ArticleDOI

Recursive partitioning analysis for disease progression in adult intracranial ependymoma patients

TL;DR: The risk of disease progression in adult intracranial ependymoma patients could be stratified by degree of resection and tumor location, and this result could provide useful information, such as when "second-look" surgery should be performed or whether small tumors invading the fourth ventricle floor should be resected at the expense of neurological deficit.
Journal ArticleDOI

Quality of life reporting in the management of posterior fossa tumours: A systematic review

TL;DR: In this article , a systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PFT) to outline the QoL reporting in the management of PFTs and measure participation level.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2007-2011.

TL;DR: The Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (CBTRUS), in collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute, is the largest population-based registry focused exclusively on primary brain and other central nervous system (CNS) tumors in the US.
Journal ArticleDOI

Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care.

TL;DR: The SF-36 was able to detect low levels of ill health in patients who had scored 0 (good health) on the Nottingham health profile and is a promising new instrument for measuring health perception in a general population.
Journal ArticleDOI

Molecular Classification of Ependymal Tumors across All CNS Compartments, Histopathological Grades, and Age Groups

Kristian W. Pajtler, +61 more
- 11 May 2015 - 
TL;DR: The molecular classification proposed herein outperforms the current histopathological classification and thus might serve as a basis for the next World Health Organization classification of CNS tumors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Validation of the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor Module (MDASI-BT).

TL;DR: The 22 item MDASI-BT demonstrated validity and reliability in patients with PBT and can be used to identify symptom occurrence throughout the disease trajectory and to evaluate interventions designed for symptom management.
Related Papers (5)

Molecular Classification of Ependymal Tumors across All CNS Compartments, Histopathological Grades, and Age Groups

Kristian W. Pajtler, +61 more
- 11 May 2015 -