scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

CO2 storage capacity estimation: Issues and development of standards

TLDR
The Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum (www.cslforum.org) as mentioned in this paper has proposed a set of guidelines for estimation of CO2 storage capacity, which will greatly assist future deliberations by government and industry on the appropriateness of geological storage in different geological settings.
About
This article is published in International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control.The article was published on 2007-04-01 and is currently open access. It has received 414 citations till now.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

CO2 storage capacity estimation: Methodology and gaps

TL;DR: In this paper, a set of definitions and methodologies for the assessment of CO2 storage capacity in geological media is presented, including coal beds and deep saline aquifers, and the level of detail and resolution required in the data make reliable and accurate estimation of the storage capacity of these media practical only at the local and site-specific scales.
Journal ArticleDOI

Geological storage of CO2 in saline aquifers—A review of the experience from existing storage operations

TL;DR: The experience from CO2 injection at pilot projects (Frio, Ketzin, Nagaoka, US Regional Partnerships) and existing commercial operations (Sleipner, Snohvit, In Salah, acid-gas injection) demonstrates that CO2 geological storage in saline aquifers is technologically feasible.
Journal ArticleDOI

A review of developments in carbon dioxide storage

TL;DR: A review of the state-of-the-art developments in CO2 storage can be found in this paper, where the authors highlight the current status, current challenges and uncertainties associated with further deployment of established approaches and feasibility demonstration of relatively newer storage concepts.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Energy resources; cornucopia or empty barrel?

TL;DR: The concept of reserve or resource estimates by current or projected annual consumption is circular in reasoning and can lead to highly erroneous conclusions as discussed by the authors, which leads to the following conclusions: 1) Resource estimates of resources and reserves are inventories of the amounts of a fossil fuel perceived to be available over some future period of time, as those resources/reserves are depleted over time, additional amounts of fossil fuels are inventoried.
Journal ArticleDOI

Australia’s CO2 geological storage potential and matching of emission sources to potential sinks

TL;DR: In this article, the potential for the underground storage of CO 2 in Australia has been investigated using the GEODISC program of the Australian Petroleum Cooperative Research Centre (APCRC), Geoscience Australia (GA) and the University of New South Wales (UNSW).
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (10)
Q1. What have the authors contributed in "Co2 storage capacity estimation: issues and development of standards" ?

This work has been initiated under the auspices of the Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum ( www. cslforum. org ), and it is intended that it will be an ongoing taskforce to further examine issues associated with storage capacity estimation. 

The conceptual geological settings that constitute the largest potential storage volumes are (in decreasing potential capacity) deep saline reservoirs, depleted gas reservoirs, oil reservoirs (with and without enhanced oil recovery), and coal beds. 

Estimates of storage capacity must take into account the range of trapping mechanisms that are possible at each site, the different geological constraints on each mechanism, and the fact that different trapping mechanisms operate on different time scales that range from instantaneous to tens of thousands of years. 

Although in principle storage capacity estimation relies on a simple series of algorithms that depend on the storage mechanism under consideration to calculate the available capacity in a certain volume of sedimentary rock at a given depth, temperature and pressure, applying them to a specific region or site is complex. 

If a site is of poor quality in terms of permeability (and thus can only accept small rates of injection), but has a lot of pore space and potential storage volume, then there will be a limit to the rate at which the CO2 can be injected for each well. 

Viable capacity –is the capacity arrived at by also considering economic, legal and regulatory barriers to CO2 geological storage, and thus builds upon the realistic capacity assessment. 

It is particularly difficult due to the various trap types and trapping mechanisms that can occur, the different time frames over which trapping becomes effective, and the different physical states in which the CO2 might occur (Table 1). 

Many of the contradictory assessments and errors in calculated storage capacity are due to the desire or need to make quick assessments with limited or no data. 

The efficiency of trapping for many of the mechanisms described in Table 1 depends upon the migration rate of the CO2, which itself is highly dependent on the rock and fluid properties and geological characteristics of each site. 

This version of the resource pyramid (Figure 3) attempts to represent the relationships between the reservoir quality and trap types (left vertical axis), trapping mechanisms (bottom axis) and the time that it takes until the trapping mechanism is effective (right horizontal axis).