scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Epicutaneous immunotherapy for the treatment of peanut allergy in children and young adults

TLDR
Peanut EPIT administration was safe and associated with a modest treatment response after 52 weeks, with the highest responses among younger children, and when coupled with a high adherence and retention rate and significant changes in immune pathways, supports further investigation of this novel therapy.
Abstract
Background Peanut allergy is common, life-threatening, and without therapeutic options We evaluated peanut epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) by using Viaskin Peanut for peanut allergy treatment Objective We sought to evaluate the clinical, safety, and immunologic effects of EPIT for the treatment of peanut allergy Methods In this multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study, 74 participants with peanut allergy (ages 4-25 years) were treated with placebo (n = 25), Viaskin Peanut 100 μg (VP100; n = 24) or Viaskin Peanut 250 μg (VP250; n = 25; DBV Technologies, Montrouge, France) The primary outcome was treatment success after 52 weeks, which was defined as passing a 5044-mg protein oral food challenge or achieving a 10-fold or greater increase in successfully consumed dose from baseline to week 52 Adverse reactions and mechanistic changes were assessed Results At week 52, treatment success was achieved in 3 (12%) placebo-treated participants, 11 (46%) VP100 participants, and 12 (48%) VP250 participants ( P  = 005 and P  = 003, respectively, compared with placebo; VP100 vs VP250, P  = 48) Median change in successfully consumed doses were 0, 43, and 130 mg of protein in the placebo, VP100, and VP250 groups, respectively (placebo vs VP100, P  = 014; placebo vs VP250, P  = 003) Treatment success was higher among younger children ( P  = 03; age, 4-11 vs >11 years) Overall, 144% of placebo doses and 798% of VP100 and VP250 doses resulted in reactions, predominantly local patch-site and mild reactions ( P  = 003) Increases in peanut-specific IgG 4 levels and IgG 4 /IgE ratios were observed in peanut EPIT-treated participants, along with trends toward reduced basophil activation and peanut-specific T H 2 cytokines Conclusions Peanut EPIT administration was safe and associated with a modest treatment response after 52 weeks, with the highest responses among younger children This, when coupled with a high adherence and retention rate and significant changes in immune pathways, supports further investigation of this novel therapy

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Food immunotherapy for children with food allergies: state of the art and science

TL;DR: The burden of food allergy is significant, multifaceted, and well documented, and the role of biologics and long-term effects of food immunotherapy are still under investigation.
Journal ArticleDOI

New modalities of allergen immunotherapy.

TL;DR: The addition of Anti-IgE therapy decreases adverse effects of subcutaneous and oral immunotherapy, and enables immunotherapy for anaphylactic food allergies and pollen-food allergy syndrome, while improving the tolerability and effectiveness of aeroallergen immunotherapy.
Journal ArticleDOI

Could This Be IT? Epicutaneous, Sublingual, and Subcutaneous Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Food Allergies.

TL;DR: The background and recent advances for food-specific immunotherapies including epicutaneous (EPIT), sublingual (SLIT), and subcutaneous (SCIT) are described, which have progressed most quickly for the treatment of peanut allergy.
Journal ArticleDOI

Immunogenicity of Milk Protein-Containing Hydrophilic Gel Patch for Epicutaneous Immunotherapy for Milk Allergy.

TL;DR: EPIT using HG is a safe method to enable oral administration even in patients with severe milk allergies, and it was suggested that MPC contained in HG has immunogenicity and a very small amount of MPC was delivered to intact skin.
Journal ArticleDOI

Current Status of Potential Therapies for IgE-Mediated Food Allergy.

TL;DR: OIT, EPIT, and SLIT appear to modulate the immune response for some food-allergic individuals, and utility for treatment of food allergies regardless of modality is limited to few foods.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Food Allergy in the United States: Summary of the NIAID-Sponsored Expert Panel Report

TL;DR: The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, working with 34 professional organizations, federal agencies, and patient advocacy groups, led the development of clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of food allergy, which include a consensus definition for food allergy.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Prevalence, Severity, and Distribution of Childhood Food Allergy in the United States

TL;DR: Findings suggest that the prevalence and severity of childhood food allergy is greater than previously reported and that disparities exist in the clinical diagnosis of disease.
Journal ArticleDOI

US prevalence of self-reported peanut, tree nut, and sesame allergy: 11-year follow-up

TL;DR: Although caution is required in comparing surveys, peanut allergy, TN allergy, or both continue to be reported by more than 1% of the US population and appear to be increasingly reported among children over the past decade.
Related Papers (5)

AR101 Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy

Brian P. Vickery, +71 more