scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Epicutaneous immunotherapy for the treatment of peanut allergy in children and young adults

TLDR
Peanut EPIT administration was safe and associated with a modest treatment response after 52 weeks, with the highest responses among younger children, and when coupled with a high adherence and retention rate and significant changes in immune pathways, supports further investigation of this novel therapy.
Abstract
Background Peanut allergy is common, life-threatening, and without therapeutic options We evaluated peanut epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) by using Viaskin Peanut for peanut allergy treatment Objective We sought to evaluate the clinical, safety, and immunologic effects of EPIT for the treatment of peanut allergy Methods In this multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study, 74 participants with peanut allergy (ages 4-25 years) were treated with placebo (n = 25), Viaskin Peanut 100 μg (VP100; n = 24) or Viaskin Peanut 250 μg (VP250; n = 25; DBV Technologies, Montrouge, France) The primary outcome was treatment success after 52 weeks, which was defined as passing a 5044-mg protein oral food challenge or achieving a 10-fold or greater increase in successfully consumed dose from baseline to week 52 Adverse reactions and mechanistic changes were assessed Results At week 52, treatment success was achieved in 3 (12%) placebo-treated participants, 11 (46%) VP100 participants, and 12 (48%) VP250 participants ( P  = 005 and P  = 003, respectively, compared with placebo; VP100 vs VP250, P  = 48) Median change in successfully consumed doses were 0, 43, and 130 mg of protein in the placebo, VP100, and VP250 groups, respectively (placebo vs VP100, P  = 014; placebo vs VP250, P  = 003) Treatment success was higher among younger children ( P  = 03; age, 4-11 vs >11 years) Overall, 144% of placebo doses and 798% of VP100 and VP250 doses resulted in reactions, predominantly local patch-site and mild reactions ( P  = 003) Increases in peanut-specific IgG 4 levels and IgG 4 /IgE ratios were observed in peanut EPIT-treated participants, along with trends toward reduced basophil activation and peanut-specific T H 2 cytokines Conclusions Peanut EPIT administration was safe and associated with a modest treatment response after 52 weeks, with the highest responses among younger children This, when coupled with a high adherence and retention rate and significant changes in immune pathways, supports further investigation of this novel therapy

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Biomarkers in Food Allergy Immunotherapy

TL;DR: Allergen-induced regulatory T cells (Tregs) increase throughout therapy and were found to be associated with sustained unresponsiveness after OIT, and subjects on OIT and SLIT have decreased Th2 cytokine production during therapy.
Journal ArticleDOI

Regional Differences in Food Allergies

TL;DR: An unmet need is demonstrated in China for a thorough investigation of the prevalence of food allergies in China, the specific foods involved, and characterization of the specific antigenic triggers of food allergy with respect to ethnicity, age, and diet in China.
Journal ArticleDOI

Unproven Diagnostic Tests for Food Allergy.

TL;DR: These procedures (IgG testing, electrodermal testing, cytotoxic testing, provocation/neutralization, and applied kinesiology) have largely been unproven and may lead to unnecessary elimination diets.
Journal ArticleDOI

Risk Factors for Adverse Reactions During OIT

TL;DR: Oral immunotherapy can have a major positive impact on patients with IgE-mediated food allergies, increasing reaction thresholds and reducing the need for dietary and lifestyle limitations, but significant concerns remain, arguably making this treatment unsuitable for routine practice.
Journal ArticleDOI

Food-Induced Anaphylaxis in Infants: Can New Evidence Assist with Implementation of Food Allergy Prevention and Treatment?

TL;DR: Recently, this paper showed that infant anaphylaxis is rare on first ingestion of a new food and typically not severe when it occurs, which parents may not be aware of when preparing to introduce peanut or other common food allergens to infants for the purpose of prevention.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Food Allergy in the United States: Summary of the NIAID-Sponsored Expert Panel Report

TL;DR: The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, working with 34 professional organizations, federal agencies, and patient advocacy groups, led the development of clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of food allergy, which include a consensus definition for food allergy.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Prevalence, Severity, and Distribution of Childhood Food Allergy in the United States

TL;DR: Findings suggest that the prevalence and severity of childhood food allergy is greater than previously reported and that disparities exist in the clinical diagnosis of disease.
Journal ArticleDOI

US prevalence of self-reported peanut, tree nut, and sesame allergy: 11-year follow-up

TL;DR: Although caution is required in comparing surveys, peanut allergy, TN allergy, or both continue to be reported by more than 1% of the US population and appear to be increasingly reported among children over the past decade.
Related Papers (5)

AR101 Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy

Brian P. Vickery, +71 more