scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Epicutaneous immunotherapy for the treatment of peanut allergy in children and young adults

TLDR
Peanut EPIT administration was safe and associated with a modest treatment response after 52 weeks, with the highest responses among younger children, and when coupled with a high adherence and retention rate and significant changes in immune pathways, supports further investigation of this novel therapy.
Abstract
Background Peanut allergy is common, life-threatening, and without therapeutic options We evaluated peanut epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) by using Viaskin Peanut for peanut allergy treatment Objective We sought to evaluate the clinical, safety, and immunologic effects of EPIT for the treatment of peanut allergy Methods In this multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study, 74 participants with peanut allergy (ages 4-25 years) were treated with placebo (n = 25), Viaskin Peanut 100 μg (VP100; n = 24) or Viaskin Peanut 250 μg (VP250; n = 25; DBV Technologies, Montrouge, France) The primary outcome was treatment success after 52 weeks, which was defined as passing a 5044-mg protein oral food challenge or achieving a 10-fold or greater increase in successfully consumed dose from baseline to week 52 Adverse reactions and mechanistic changes were assessed Results At week 52, treatment success was achieved in 3 (12%) placebo-treated participants, 11 (46%) VP100 participants, and 12 (48%) VP250 participants ( P  = 005 and P  = 003, respectively, compared with placebo; VP100 vs VP250, P  = 48) Median change in successfully consumed doses were 0, 43, and 130 mg of protein in the placebo, VP100, and VP250 groups, respectively (placebo vs VP100, P  = 014; placebo vs VP250, P  = 003) Treatment success was higher among younger children ( P  = 03; age, 4-11 vs >11 years) Overall, 144% of placebo doses and 798% of VP100 and VP250 doses resulted in reactions, predominantly local patch-site and mild reactions ( P  = 003) Increases in peanut-specific IgG 4 levels and IgG 4 /IgE ratios were observed in peanut EPIT-treated participants, along with trends toward reduced basophil activation and peanut-specific T H 2 cytokines Conclusions Peanut EPIT administration was safe and associated with a modest treatment response after 52 weeks, with the highest responses among younger children This, when coupled with a high adherence and retention rate and significant changes in immune pathways, supports further investigation of this novel therapy

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Next generation immunotherapy for tree pollen allergies.

TL;DR: The current progress in applying protein and peptide-based approaches and DNA vaccines to the clinical challenges posed by tree pollen allergies through the lens of preclinical animal models and clinical trials is discussed, with an emphasis on the birch and Japanese red cedar pollen induced allergies.
Journal ArticleDOI

The clinical and immune outcomes after food allergen immunotherapy emphasizing the development of tolerance.

TL;DR: The difference between immune tolerance, desensitization, and sustained unresponsiveness in relation to food immunotherapy is discussed by discussing the clinical and immunologic changes which have been recently discovered.
Journal ArticleDOI

Peanut allergy reduction in high-risk pediatric patients.

TL;DR: Evidence supports that early introduction of the peanut protein (or in combination with immunotherapy) to the highly allergic may safely desensitize patients, which could lead to less adverse allergic reactions and alter allergy management overall.
Journal ArticleDOI

Immunothérapie allergénique chez l’enfant et l’adolescent

TL;DR: The main immunological mechanisms and indications for immunotherapy in children and adolescents are considered and the prevention of new sensitizations by immunotherapy is still under discussion.
Journal ArticleDOI

Formulation-based approaches for dermal delivery of vaccines and therapeutic nucleic acids: Recent advances and future perspectives.

TL;DR: The delivery platforms discussed in this review may provide formulation scientists and clinicians with a better vision of the alternatives for dermal delivery of biomacromolecules, which may facilitate the development of new patient‐friendly prophylactic and therapeutic medicines.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Food Allergy in the United States: Summary of the NIAID-Sponsored Expert Panel Report

TL;DR: The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, working with 34 professional organizations, federal agencies, and patient advocacy groups, led the development of clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of food allergy, which include a consensus definition for food allergy.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Prevalence, Severity, and Distribution of Childhood Food Allergy in the United States

TL;DR: Findings suggest that the prevalence and severity of childhood food allergy is greater than previously reported and that disparities exist in the clinical diagnosis of disease.
Journal ArticleDOI

US prevalence of self-reported peanut, tree nut, and sesame allergy: 11-year follow-up

TL;DR: Although caution is required in comparing surveys, peanut allergy, TN allergy, or both continue to be reported by more than 1% of the US population and appear to be increasingly reported among children over the past decade.
Related Papers (5)

AR101 Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy

Brian P. Vickery, +71 more