scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Epicutaneous immunotherapy for the treatment of peanut allergy in children and young adults

TLDR
Peanut EPIT administration was safe and associated with a modest treatment response after 52 weeks, with the highest responses among younger children, and when coupled with a high adherence and retention rate and significant changes in immune pathways, supports further investigation of this novel therapy.
Abstract
Background Peanut allergy is common, life-threatening, and without therapeutic options We evaluated peanut epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) by using Viaskin Peanut for peanut allergy treatment Objective We sought to evaluate the clinical, safety, and immunologic effects of EPIT for the treatment of peanut allergy Methods In this multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study, 74 participants with peanut allergy (ages 4-25 years) were treated with placebo (n = 25), Viaskin Peanut 100 μg (VP100; n = 24) or Viaskin Peanut 250 μg (VP250; n = 25; DBV Technologies, Montrouge, France) The primary outcome was treatment success after 52 weeks, which was defined as passing a 5044-mg protein oral food challenge or achieving a 10-fold or greater increase in successfully consumed dose from baseline to week 52 Adverse reactions and mechanistic changes were assessed Results At week 52, treatment success was achieved in 3 (12%) placebo-treated participants, 11 (46%) VP100 participants, and 12 (48%) VP250 participants ( P  = 005 and P  = 003, respectively, compared with placebo; VP100 vs VP250, P  = 48) Median change in successfully consumed doses were 0, 43, and 130 mg of protein in the placebo, VP100, and VP250 groups, respectively (placebo vs VP100, P  = 014; placebo vs VP250, P  = 003) Treatment success was higher among younger children ( P  = 03; age, 4-11 vs >11 years) Overall, 144% of placebo doses and 798% of VP100 and VP250 doses resulted in reactions, predominantly local patch-site and mild reactions ( P  = 003) Increases in peanut-specific IgG 4 levels and IgG 4 /IgE ratios were observed in peanut EPIT-treated participants, along with trends toward reduced basophil activation and peanut-specific T H 2 cytokines Conclusions Peanut EPIT administration was safe and associated with a modest treatment response after 52 weeks, with the highest responses among younger children This, when coupled with a high adherence and retention rate and significant changes in immune pathways, supports further investigation of this novel therapy

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Is epicutaneous immunotherapy only skin deep

TL;DR: The peanut food allergy epidemic is at least partially iatrogenic, enhanced by previous international recommendations to postpone the introduction of peanut to high-risk populations, and although new recommendations were recently published, their implementation poses major cost and logistic challenges.
DissertationDOI

Analyses of IgE-epitope profiles from legume allergens as approach towards the development of novel diagnostic and therapeutic reagents in food allergy

Jasmin Popp
TL;DR: Whether peptides may serve as additional or alternative reagents in the in vitro diagnosis of legume allergy is determined and the influence of post-translational hydroxylation of proline residues in peanut Ara h 2 on the capacity to bind serum IgE and thus on the diagnostic value was additionally investigated on the peptide level.
Journal ArticleDOI

Are blood cytokines reliable biomarkers of allergic disease diagnosis and treatment responses?

TL;DR: In this paper , the authors discuss the use of cytokine measurements in association with disease diagnosis and management and suggest that among the variety of suggested cytokines, thymus and activation-regulated chemokine stands out and can indeed serve as a biomarker of atopic dermatitis.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Peanut Allergic Patient: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention

TL;DR: Information on the current research in the diagnosis and treatment of PAs as well as the latest guidelines established to prevent PA development are presented, allowing NPs to provide the best care possible for their patients.
Journal ArticleDOI

Open-label study of the efficacy, safety and durability of peanut sublingual immunotherapy in peanut-allergic children.

TL;DR: The authors evaluated the efficacy and safety of 4-mg peanut sublingual immunotherapy and persistence of desensitization after SLIT discontinuation for 1-to 11-year-old children.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Food Allergy in the United States: Summary of the NIAID-Sponsored Expert Panel Report

TL;DR: The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, working with 34 professional organizations, federal agencies, and patient advocacy groups, led the development of clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of food allergy, which include a consensus definition for food allergy.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Prevalence, Severity, and Distribution of Childhood Food Allergy in the United States

TL;DR: Findings suggest that the prevalence and severity of childhood food allergy is greater than previously reported and that disparities exist in the clinical diagnosis of disease.
Journal ArticleDOI

US prevalence of self-reported peanut, tree nut, and sesame allergy: 11-year follow-up

TL;DR: Although caution is required in comparing surveys, peanut allergy, TN allergy, or both continue to be reported by more than 1% of the US population and appear to be increasingly reported among children over the past decade.
Related Papers (5)

AR101 Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy

Brian P. Vickery, +71 more