scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

How can managers reduce employee intention to quit

TLDR
In this article, the authors investigated the variables that may be predictive of intention to leave a job, and tested a model that includes mediating variables such as emotional support from supervisors and self-esteem.
Abstract
This paper reports on an investigation of the variables that may be predictive of intentions to leave a job, and tests a model that includes mediating variables. A total of 173 retail salespeople completed questionnaires measuring commitment to the organization for which they worked, job satisfaction, stress, supervisor support, locus of control, self‐esteem, the perceived stressors in the job and their intention to quit. Path analysis was used to test the relationships hypothesized in the model. The majority of hypotheses were supported, with the variables included accounting for 52 per cent of the variance in intention to quit. Emotional support from supervisors and self‐esteem mediated the impact of stressors on stress reactions, job satisfaction, commitment to the organization and intention to quit. It is suggested that to ameliorate intention to quit and in turn reduce turnover, managers need to actively monitor workloads, and the relationships between supervisors and subordinates in order to reduce and manage stress. Managers also need to monitor both the extrinsic and intrinsic sources of job satisfaction available to employees. These activities could assist in maintaining and increasing job satisfaction and commitment to the organization.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Deakin Research Online
This is the authors’ final peer reviewed (post print) version of the
item published as:
Firth, Lucy, Mellor, David, Moore, Kathleen A and Loquet, Claude 2004,
How can managers reduce employee intention to quit?, Journal of
managerial psychology, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 170-187.
Available from Deakin Research Online:
http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30008720
Reproduced with the kind permission of the copyright owner.
Copyright : 2004, Emerald Group Publishing

Howcanmanagersreduceemployeeintentiontoquit?
LucyFirth,DepartmentofInformationSystems,UniversityofMelbourne,Melbourne,
Australia
DavidJ.Mellor,SchoolofPsychology,DeakinUniversity,Melbourne,Australia
KathleenA.Moore,SchoolofPsychology,DeakinUniversity,Melbourne,Australia
ClaudeLoquet,SchoolofPsychology,DeakinUniversity,Melbourne,Australia
Abstract
Thispaperreportsonaninvestigationofthevariablesthatmaybepredictiveofintentions
toleaveajob,andtestsamodelthatincludesmediatingvariables.Atotalof173retail
salespeoplecompletedquestionnairesmeasuringcommitmenttotheorganizationfor
whichtheyworked,jobsatisfaction,stress,supervisorsupport,locusofcontrol,selfesteem,
theperceivedstressorsinthejobandtheirintentiontoquit.Pathanalysiswasusedtotest
therelationshipshypothesizedinthemodel.Themajorityofhypothesesweresupported,
withthevariablesincludedaccountingfor52percentofthevarianceinintentiontoquit.
Emotionalsupportfromsupervisorsandselfesteemmediatedtheimpactofstressorson
stressreactions,jobsatisfaction,commitmenttotheorganizationandintentiontoquit.Itis
suggestedthattoameliorateintentiontoquitandinturnreduceturnover,managersneed
toactivelymonitorworkloads,andtherelationshipsbetweensupervisorsandsubordinates
inordertoreduceandmanagestress.Managersalsoneedtomonitorboththeextrinsicand
intrinsicsourcesofjobsatisfactionavailabletoemployees.Theseactivitiescouldassistin
maintainingandincreasingjobsatisfactionandcommitmenttotheorganization.
“Whatdeterminesemployeeturnover?”Theanswertothisquestionhasgreatrelevanceto
theindividualwhomaybethinkingaboutquittingajob,andforthemanagerwhoisfaced
withlackofemployeecontinuity,thehighcostsinvolvedintheinductionandtrainingof
newstaff,and,notleast,issuesoforganizationalproductivity.Whileactualquitting
behaviouristheprimaryfocusofinteresttoemployersandresearchers,intentiontoquitis
arguedtobeastrongsurrogateindicatorforsuchbehaviour.Jobstressorsandlackofjob
satisfactionareamongthefactorsthatcontributetopeople'sintentiontoquittheirjobs
(Moore,2002);however,itisimportantbothfromthemanager'sandtheindividual's
perspectivetounderstandthefactorsthatmediatetherelationshipbetweenjobstressand
intentiontoquit.Thisstudyhadthreeaims:
1. Weaimedtoinvestigatetheeffectofjobstressorsonjobengagement(job
satisfaction,jobcommitmentandfeelingsofjobstress),andtorelateallofthese
variablestointentiontoquit.
2. Weaimedtoinvestigatewhetherpeople'sdispositionalfactors(locusofcontrol,
selfesteemandperceptionsofsocialsupport)weremediatorsofintentiontoquit.
3. Weaimedtoprovideacomprehensivemodelofintentionstoquitthatcouldbe
extrapolatedtoinformquittingbehaviour.
Intentionsare,accordingtoresearcherssuchasAjzenandFishbein(1980)andIgbariaand
Greenhaus(1992),themostimmediatedeterminantsofactualbehaviour.Theyarealsoof

practicalmeritfromaresearchperspective,asoncepeoplehaveactuallyimplementedthe
behaviourtoquit,thereislittlelikelihoodofgainingaccesstothemtounderstandtheir
priorsituation.Thevalidityofstudyingintentionsintheworkplacecanalsobedrawnfrom
Sager's(1991)longitudinalstudyofsalespeople,inwhichintentiontoquitwasfoundto
discriminateeffectivelybetweenleaversandstayers.However,whileitisreasonableto
arguethatintentionsareanaccurateindicatorofsubsequentbehaviour,westilldonot
knowwhatdeterminessuchintentions.
Numerousresearchers(e.g.Bluedorn,1982;KalliathandBeck,2001;Krameretal.,1995;
Petersetal.,1981;Saks,1996)haveattemptedtoanswerthequestionofwhatdetermines
people'sintentiontoquitbyinvestigatingpossibleantecedentsofemployees’intentionsto
quit.Todate,therehasbeenlittleconsistencyinfindings,whichispartlyduetothe
diversityofconstructsincludedbytheresearchersandthelackofconsistencyintheir
measurementsbutalsorelatestotheheterogeneityofpopulationssampled.Further,some
authorshavereportedvaliditycoefficients(readfactorloadings)forthevariablesunder
investigationbut,whilestatisticallysignificant,theseareoftenoflittlepracticalutility.Such
authorshavealsofailedtoreporttheamountofvarianceinintentiontoquitexplainedby
thefactorsintheirmodels.
Despitetheselimitations,amongthevariablesconsistentlyfoundtorelatetointentionto
quitare:
theexperienceofjobrelatedstress(jobstress);
therangeoffactorsthatleadtojobrelatedstress(stressors);
lackofcommitmenttotheorganization;and
jobdissatisfaction(e.g.GreenhausandBeutell,1985;IgbariaandGreenhaus,1992;
Kahnetal.,1964;Leongetal.,1996;Lumetal.,1998;Petersetal.,1981;Rahimand
Psenicka,1996).
Thesevariablescanbemediatedbypersonalordispositionalfactorsandbyenvironmental
ororganizationalfactors.Amongthepersonalfactorsthatmediatebetweenstressorsand
intentiontoquitareaspectsofpersonalagency,selfesteemandsocialsupport(e.g.Avison
andGotlib,1994;Coyneetal.,1990;CoyneandDowney,1991;TurnerandRoszell,1994).
Personalagencyreferstoconceptssuchasasenseofpowerlessness,locusofcontroland
personalcontrol.Researchfindingsstronglysuggestthatagreatersenseofpersonalagency
isassociatedwithareducedriskofnegativeoutcomesfollowingmajornegativelifeevents
androlerelatedstress(seeTurnerandRoszell,1994).Oneofthepersonalagencyvariables,
locusofcontrol,whichreferstotheextenttowhichpeoplebelievetheyorexternalfactors
suchaschanceandpowerfulothersareincontroloftheeventsthatinfluencetheirlives
(Levenson,1974;Rotter,1966),hasbeenstudiedinrelationtotheworkplace.Rahimand
Psenicka(1996)foundthataninternallocusofcontrolmediatedtherelationshipbetween
jobstressorsandtheintentiontoleaveajob.Morespecifically,internallocusofcontrolwas
foundtobepositivelyrelatedtojobsatisfaction(Sujan,1986)andtobeingemployed
(WatersandMoore,2002),whileanexternalorientationwasfoundtobenegativelyrelated
tojobsatisfaction(BehrmanandPerreault,1984)andwashigheramongunemployed
versusemployedpeople(WatersandMoore,2001).

Selfesteemreferstotheevaluationthatindividualsmakeandcustomarilymaintainwith
regardtothemselves.ReviewsbyKaplan(1975,1980)andsubsequentstudiesbyother
researchers(e.g.Silverstone,1991;WatersandMoore,2002)haveconsistentlyshownthat
lowselfesteemisrelatedtopsychologicalproblems,unemploymentandmaladaptive
behaviours.Anumberofotherstudieshaveprovidedsupportforthecontentionthathigh
selfesteemiscorrelatedwithjobsatisfaction(e.g.GreenhausandBadin,1974;Inkson,
1978;Kohli,1985;Teas,1981,1982).InastudybyMoore(2002),arelatedconstruct,self
efficacy(assessedspecificallyamongnursesinrelationtotheirprofessionalabilities),was
associatedwithreducedintentiontoquit(β=0.23).
Socialsupporthasbeenshowntoplayanimportantroleinmitigatingintentiontoquit,
althoughnotallfindingshavebeeninagreement.Forexample,Moore(2002)foundthat
socialsupportfromsupervisorsreducedthelevelofnurses’burnoutandindirectly,through
reducedlevelsofburnout,reducednurses’intentiontoquit.Asimilarresultwasreported
byKalliathandBeck(2001)whentheytestedtheimpactofsocialsupportontwo
componentsofburnout,namelydepersonalizationandemotionalexhaustion,andfound
thatsupervisorysupportreducednotonlythosesymptomsofburnoutbutalsodirectlyand
indirectlynurses’intentiontoquit.Ontheotherhand,Munn etal.(1996),inastudyof
Americanchildlifespecialists,foundlackofsupervisorsupportwasthebestpredictorofjob
dissatisfactionandintentiontoleaveajob,whileHattonandEmerson(1998)foundthat
actualstaffturnoverwaspredictedinpartbylowlevelsofsupportfromsuperiors.
However,otherstudies(e.g.RahimandPsenicka,1996)havefailedtofindamoderating
effectforsocialsupportintherelationshipbetweenjobstressorsandintentiontoquit.
Otherresearchers(e.g.Coghlan,1984;KellyandCross,1985)havefoundthatratherthan
supervisors’support,itisthesupportgainedfromtalkingwithpeers,familyandfriendsthat
isfrequentlycitedasasourceofstressreduction.Consistentwiththesefindings,Freddolino
andHeaney(1992)foundthatpeersocialsupportwasassociatedwithhigherjob
satisfactionamongdirectcarestaffandhomemanagersforintellectuallydisabledclients,
whileintentiontoquitwasassociatedwiththepresenceofsocialunderminingbyco
workersandprovideragencies.However,thebulkofevidencesuggeststhatitissituation
specificsupport,thatis,worksupervisor/homefamily(e.g.TinkerandMoore,2001),
thatis
mosteffective.Accordingly,inthisstudyweexaminedtheroleofsupervisors’supportin
employees’intentiontoquit.
Othervariablesimportantinthecontinuityofemploymentareemployees’jobsatisfaction
andtheircommitmenttotheorganization.Therelationshipsbetweenthesevariablesand
intentiontoquithavebeenfoundto
prevailacrossarangeofoccupations.Forinstance,
Wunderetal.(1982)foundthatjobstressorshadadirect,negativeeffectonjobsatisfaction
amongmanagersofalargeinternationalmanufacturer,whichledtoareducedcommitment
totheorganizationandtointentiontoquitandactualquittingbehaviour.However,several
otherstudies(e.g.ArmstrongStassenetal.,1994;IgbariaandGreenhaus,1992;Koeskeand
Koeske,1993;TinkerandMoore,2001)havefoundnodirecteffectofstressorsonintention
toquit,butratherindirecteffectsthroughtheexperienceofjobstress,socialsupport,job
satisfactionandlackofcommitmenttotheorganization.Forexample,Igbariaand
Greenhaus(1992)reportedthatamongmanagementinformationsystemspersonnel,the
mostimmediatedeterminantsofturnoverintentionswerelackofjobsatisfactionandlack
ofcommitmenttotheorganization.Itisimportant,therefore,toevaluateboththedirect
andindirecteffectsofjobstressorsonintentiontoquit.

Thisstudyassessedtheimpactofjobstressorsonintentiontoquitusingthedispositional
factors:locusofcontrol,selfesteem,andperceptionsofsupervisorsupport;andmediating
variablesthatarerelatedtojobengagement:commitmenttotheorganization,job
satisfaction,andfeelingsofstress.ThehypothesizedmodelispresentedinFigure1.
Method
Participants
Atotalof173salespeoplewererecruitedfromtheclothingsectionsofalargedepartment
storeinAustralia.Thesampleconsistedof164femalesandninemales,withameanageof
35.95years(SD=12.66,R=1861).Educationlevelsvariedfromcompletingsometimeathigh
schooltocompletingadegree.Intermsofyearsofservice,11participantshadworkedat
thestoreforlessthanoneyear,33foronetothreeyears,60forfourtosixyears,27for
seventotenyears,and42formorethantenyears.
Measures
AquestionnaireadaptedfromthecomprehensiveworkplacescaledevelopedbyTateetal.
(1997)fortheirtrinationstudywasusedinthisstudy(seetheAppendix).Tateand
colleaguesreportedadequateinternalreliabilityforeachfactorofthescale(α=0.61to
0.91).Thefactorsassessedwerestressors,jobstress,jobsatisfaction,commitmenttothe
organization,locusofcontrol,selfesteem,supportofferedbysupervisorsandintentionto
quit.Eachofthefactorsisexplainedbelow.
Stressorsmeasuredfouraspectsofstress.Threeitemsmeasuredeachofthefollowing
stressors:
roleambiguity(e.g.myjobresponsibilitiesarenotcleartome);
roleconflict(e.g.tosatisfysomepeopleatmyjob,Ihavetoupsetothers);
workoverload(e.g.itseemstomethatIhavemoreworkatmyjobthanIcan
handle);and
workfamilyconflict(e.g.myworkmakesmetootiredtoenjoyfamilylife).
ItemswereansweredonafivepointLikertscale,fromagreetodisagree.
Jobstresswasmeasuredwiththreeburnoutitems(e.g.Ifeelemotionallydrainedbymy
job)andfiveitemsrelatedtoanxietyandsomatic
complaints(e.g.jobrelatedproblems
keepmeawakeatnight;Ifeeltenseatmyjob).Participantsindicatedonasixpointscale
thedegreetowhichtheyexperiencedeachofthesesymptoms.
JobsatisfactionwasmeasuredusingafivepointLikertscaletoassessparticipants
agreementwithfourstatementsrelatingtoextrinsicfactors(e.g.jobsecurity,physical
conditions),andfourstatementsrelatingtointrinsicfactors(e.g.therecognitionreceived
forworkdone,thefreedomgiventodoone'sbestatthejob).
Commitmenttotheorganizationwasassessedviafiveitemsratedonafivepointscale(e.g.
Ireallycareaboutthefateofthisstore).

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Locus of control at work: a meta‐analysis

TL;DR: The authors meta-analyzed the relationship between locus of control (LOC) and a wide range of work outcomes and found that internal locus was positively associated with favorable work outcomes, such as positive task and social experiences, and greater job motivation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Leadership, job well-being, and health effects--a systematic review and a meta-analysis.

TL;DR: There is a relative lack of well-founded prospective studies targeting the association between leadership and employee health, but the few available good studies suggest an important role of leadership on employee job satisfaction, job well-being, sickness absences, and disability pensions.
Journal ArticleDOI

A review of the literature on employee turnover

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the sources of employee turnover, effects and forwards some strategies on how to minimize employee turnover in organisations, which can be used by managers in various organisations to ensure that there is employee continuity in their organisations to enhance organizational competitiveness.
Journal ArticleDOI

Antecedents and consequences of job satisfaction in the hotel industry

TL;DR: In this paper, the antecedents (i.e., role ambiguity and conflict, burnout, socialization, and work autonomy) and consequences (e.g., affective and continuance commitment, absenteeism, and employee turnover intention) of employee job satisfaction were investigated.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Importance of Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment in Shaping Turnover Intent: A Test of a Causal Model

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors surveyed correctional staff at a maximum security private prison to examine the impact of the work environment, personal characteristics, external employment opportunities, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment on turnover intent.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Moderating Effect of Organizational Commitment on the Occupational Stress Outcome Relationship

TL;DR: In this paper, the effect of organizational commitment as a moderator of the stress-outcome relationship was examined and it was predicted that commitment buffered the negative outcomes in terms of job satisfaction, mental and physical health, and intention to quit.
Journal ArticleDOI

Some Unexplored Supervisory Behaviors and Their Influence on Salespeople's Role Clarity, Specific Self- Esteem, Job Satisfaction, and Motivation:

TL;DR: In this article, the influence of four unexplored supervisory behaviors on salespeople: arbitrary and punitive behavior, contingent approving behavior, upward-influencing behavior, and achie...
Journal ArticleDOI

Effects of Consumer Expectations on Information Processing in Selling Encounters

TL;DR: This paper found that prior expectations about salespeople affect how consumers process information in a selling situation, and that when the salesperson is seen as typical, product evaluations ar ect This paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Relationship Between the Amount and Helpfulness of Entry Thaining and Work Outcomes

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined the relationship between the amount and helpfulness of entry training and work outcomes for newcomers during organizational socialization and found that the amount of training received by newcomers was significantly related to job satisfaction, commitment, intention to quit, ability to cope, and several measures of job performance.
Journal Article

Is the Path to Burnout and Turnover Paved by a Lack of Supervisory Support? A Structural Equations Test

TL;DR: In this article, the authors used structural equations modeling to test the hypotheses that low levels of supervisory support will have both direct and mediated effects on job burnout and turnover intentions of nurses working in a large New Zealand hospital.
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (1)
Q1. What are the contributions in this paper?

This paper reports on an investigation of the variables that may be predictive of intentions to leave a job, and tests a model that includes mediating variables. This study had three aims: 1. the authors aimed to investigate the effect of job stressors on job engagement ( job satisfaction, job commitment and feelings of job stress ), and to relate all of these variables to intention to quit. 2. the authors aimed to investigate whether people 's dispositional factors ( locus of control, self‐esteem and perceptions of social support ) were mediators of intention to quit. 3. the authors aimed to provide a comprehensive model of intentions to quit that could be extrapolated to inform quitting behaviour. One of the personal agency variables, locus of control, which refers to the extent to which people believe they or external factors such as chance and powerful others are in control of the events that influence their lives ( Levenson, 1974 ; Rotter, 1966 ), has been studied in relation to the work place. In a study by Moore ( 2002 ), a related construct, self‐ efficacy ( assessed specifically among nurses in relation to their professional abilities ), was associated with reduced intention to quit ( β=−0. 23 ). On the other hand, Munn et al. ( 1996 ), in a study of American child life specialists, found lack of supervisor support was the best predictor of job dissatisfaction and intention to leave a job, while Hatton and Emerson ( 1998 ) found that actual staff turnover was predicted in part by low levels of support from superiors. Consistent with these findings, Freddolino and Heaney ( 1992 ) found that peer social support was associated with higher job satisfaction among direct care staff and home managers for intellectually disabled clients, while intention to quit was associated with the presence of social undermining by co‐ workers and provider agencies. Accordingly, in this study the authors examined the role of supervisors ’ support in employees ’ intention to quit. This study assessed the impact of job stressors on intention to quit using the dispositional factors: locus of control, self‐esteem, and perceptions of supervisor support ; and mediating variables that are related to job engagement: commitment to the organization, job satisfaction, and feelings of stress. The hypothesized model is presented in Figure 1. It is suggested that to ameliorate intention to quit and in turn reduce turnover, managers need to actively monitor workloads, and the relationships between supervisors and subordinates in order to reduce and manage stress. Further, some authors have reported validity co‐efficients ( read factor loadings ) for the variables under investigation but, while statistically significant, these are often of little practical utility. Research findings strongly suggest that a greater sense of personal agency is associated with a reduced risk of negative outcomes following major negative life events and role‐related stress ( see Turner and Roszell, 1994 ). However, the bulk of evidence suggests that it is situation‐ specific support, that is, work‐supervisor/home‐family ( e. g. Tinker and Moore, 2001 ), that is most effective. 

Trending Questions (3)
How do managers influence employee exit?

Managers can reduce employee intention to quit by actively monitoring workloads, relationships with supervisors, and sources of job satisfaction.

How can managers best address the issue of job resentment?

Managers can address job resentment by actively monitoring workloads, relationships between supervisors and subordinates, and both extrinsic and intrinsic sources of job satisfaction.

What can your organization do to increase your job satisfaction?

These activities could assist in maintaining and increasing job satisfaction and commitment to the organization.