Hubble Space Telescope Advanced Camera for Surveys Coronagraphic Imaging of the AU Microscopii Debris Disk
read more
Citations
A planetary system as the origin of structure in Fomalhaut's dust belt
A reappraisal of the habitability of planets around M dwarf stars.
Spitzer IRS Spectroscopy of IRAS-discovered Debris Disks*
Nearby Debris Disk Systems with High Fractional Luminosity Reconsidered
Dust dynamics, surface brightness profiles, and thermal spectra of debris disks: the case of au microscopii
References
The β Pictoris Moving Group
Hubble Space Telescope Observations of the Disk and Jet of HH 30
NICMOS Imaging of the HR 4796A Circumstellar Disk
Discovery of a large dust disk around the nearby star AU Microscopii.
Dynamical modeling of large scale asymmetries in the beta Pictoris dust disk
Related Papers (5)
Discovery of a large dust disk around the nearby star AU Microscopii.
Dust dynamics, surface brightness profiles, and thermal spectra of debris disks: the case of au microscopii
Dust Dynamics, Surface Brightness Profiles, and Thermal Spectra of Debris Disks: The Case of AU Mic
A planetary system as the origin of structure in Fomalhaut's dust belt
Hubble Space Telescope ACS Multiband Coronagraphic Imaging of the Debris Disk around β Pictoris
Frequently Asked Questions (16)
Q2. What are the contributions in "Hubble space telescope advanced camera for surveys coronagraphic imaging of the au microscopii debris disk" ?
The authors present Hubble Space Telescope Advanced Camera for Surveys multicolor coronagraphic images of the recently discovered edge-on debris disk around the nearby ( 10 pc ) M dwarf AU Microscopii. The intrinsic, deprojected FWHM thickness is 1. 5–10 AU, increasing with radius.
Q3. What is the dominant source of error for r 1B5?
Their residuals, which appear as alternating positive and negative rings, are the dominant source of error for r < 1B5, where they create localized uncertainties of 30% on 0B1 scales in the disk brightness in the F606W images.
Q4. Why is the disk visible inside the star?
Because the disk is fairly bright close to the star and the corrective optics modify the aberrated light that passes by the occulter, the disk can actually be seen inside the spot to within 0B75 of the star.
Q5. What is the ACS IDT strategy for detecting AU Mic?
Since AU Mic was on the ACS IDT target list before discovery of its disk, the team’s standard observation strategy for suspected disks was used: initial imaging in one filter to confirm the existence of a disk, followed later with multicolor imaging.
Q6. What apertures were used to measure the fluxes for HD 216149?
The fluxes for HD 216149 in the three filters were measured using 30 pixel radius apertures, which include all of the saturated pixels.
Q7. Why is the spot interior undersubtracted in F814W?
in F814W the spot interior appears oversubtracted, and in F435W it is undersubtracted, probably because of focus mismatches.
Q8. Why is the FWHM of the AUMic disk in Figure 7?
Because the AUMic disk is optically thin (KLM04), nearly all of the observed light is singly scattered, and the fraction of multiply scattered photons should be insignificant.
Q9. Why was the AU Mic and HD 216149 measurements made using the pixel area maps?
Because the AU Mic and HD 216149 measurements were made using images that had not been corrected for ACS geometrical distortion, compensation for pixel area distortion was made using the pixel area maps provided by STScI (Pavlovsky et al. 2004).
Q10. What is the scattering surface density at radius r and height z?
Assuming axial symmetry, the scattering surface density (r, z) at radius r and height z is characterized by (r; z) ¼ 0(r=r0) (z; h), where 0 is the midplane scattering density at some fiducial radius r0 and the scale height of the vertical distribution profile (z) varies as h ¼ h0(r=r0) .
Q11. How many debris disks have been resolved?
Although numerous detections and images of optically thick accretion disks have been made, only a few debris disks have been resolved.
Q12. What is the radial brightness of the middle zone?
The middle zone (1B5 < r < 4B3) has a moderate radial decrease in brightness (I / r 1:8), which is slightly steeper than that measured by L04 (from r 1.0 to r 1.4).
Q13. How many times does the coronagraph improve the contrast between the disk and the background?
The residual levels indicate that using the coronagraph with PSF subtraction improves the disk-tobackground contrast by 150 times compared with direct imaging without subtraction.
Q14. What is the effect of electronic noise on the F435W image?
The residuals in the F435W image are more uniform than in the other two filters, but because AU Mic is much fainter in that passband, the effects of electronic noise are more significant.
Q15. How many squares were added to the data?
The extended source detection limits in the subtracted images were estimated by adding 100 ; 100 uniform-intensity squares to the data at 300 and 900 from the star perpendicular to the circumstellar disk.
Q16. What is the intensity of reflected light from each point in the three-dimensional model?
The intensity of reflected light from each point in the three-dimensional model is modified by the Henyey-Greenstein scattering phase function.