scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma

TLDR
Conurrent therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab had a manageable safety profile and provided clinical activity that appears to be distinct from that in published data on monotherapy, with rapid and deep tumor regression in a substantial proportion of patients.
Abstract
A total of 53 patients received concurrent therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab, and 33 received sequenced treatment. The objective-response rate (according to modified World Health Organization criteria) for all patients in the concurrent-regimen group was 40%. Evidence of clinical activity (conventional, unconfirmed, or immune-related response or stable disease for ≥24 weeks) was observed in 65% of patients. At the maximum doses that were associated with an acceptable level of adverse events (nivolumab at a dose of 1 mg per kilogram of body weight and ipilimumab at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram), 53% of patients had an objective response, all with tumor reduction of 80% or more. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events related to therapy occurred in 53% of patients in the concurrent-regimen group but were qualitatively similar to previous experience with monotherapy and were generally reversible. Among patients in the sequenced-regimen group, 18% had grade 3 or 4 adverse events related to therapy and the objective-response rate was 20%. CONCLUSIONS Concurrent therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab had a manageable safety profile and provided clinical activity that appears to be distinct from that in published data on monotherapy, with rapid and deep tumor regression in a substantial proportion of patients. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01024231.)

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Targeting immune checkpoints in unresectable metastatic cutaneous melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 agents trials.

TL;DR: It is demonstrated that immune checkpoint inhibitors have superior outcomes compared to conventional chemotherapies or vaccination, and support the results of recent randomized trials that showed superior outcomes with anti‐PD‐1 agents over ipilimumab in unresectable metastatic cutaneous melanoma patients.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Optimal Partnership of Radiation and Immunotherapy: from Preclinical Studies to Clinical Translation

TL;DR: Radiotherapy significantly contributes to a therapeutically effective anti-tumor immune response when combined with targeted immunotherapy agents, and this partnership between radiation and immunotherapy is illustrated.
Journal ArticleDOI

Adapting Cancer Immunotherapy Models for the Real World

TL;DR: Recent findings are discussed that highlight how efficacy and toxicity of cancer immunotherapy are affected by patient variation, and how distinct host environments can be better modeled in animal studies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Renal effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors

TL;DR: Two different forms of ICPI-induced renal damage have been identified, including acute (granulomatous) tubulointerstitial nephritis and immune complex glomerulonephritis.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation.

TL;DR: Recognition of the widespread applicability of these concepts will increasingly affect the development of new means to treat human cancer.
Journal ArticleDOI

Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

TL;DR: The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group criteria for toxicity and response are presented to facilitate future reference and to encourage further standardization among those conducting clinical trials.
Related Papers (5)