scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma

TLDR
Conurrent therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab had a manageable safety profile and provided clinical activity that appears to be distinct from that in published data on monotherapy, with rapid and deep tumor regression in a substantial proportion of patients.
Abstract
A total of 53 patients received concurrent therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab, and 33 received sequenced treatment. The objective-response rate (according to modified World Health Organization criteria) for all patients in the concurrent-regimen group was 40%. Evidence of clinical activity (conventional, unconfirmed, or immune-related response or stable disease for ≥24 weeks) was observed in 65% of patients. At the maximum doses that were associated with an acceptable level of adverse events (nivolumab at a dose of 1 mg per kilogram of body weight and ipilimumab at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram), 53% of patients had an objective response, all with tumor reduction of 80% or more. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events related to therapy occurred in 53% of patients in the concurrent-regimen group but were qualitatively similar to previous experience with monotherapy and were generally reversible. Among patients in the sequenced-regimen group, 18% had grade 3 or 4 adverse events related to therapy and the objective-response rate was 20%. CONCLUSIONS Concurrent therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab had a manageable safety profile and provided clinical activity that appears to be distinct from that in published data on monotherapy, with rapid and deep tumor regression in a substantial proportion of patients. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01024231.)

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Pseudoprogression and Immune-Related Response in Solid Tumors

TL;DR: Antibodies to PD-1 and PD-L1 have shown potential clinical benefit in advanced solid tumors and drugs and additional immune checkpoint inhibitors are currently under investigation in multiple clinical trials as single-agent therapy and also in combination with other agents.
Journal ArticleDOI

Coinhibitory Pathways in Immunotherapy for Cancer.

TL;DR: The immunoregulatory functions of coinhibitory pathways and their translation to effective immunotherapies for cancer are discussed and blockade of the PD-1 and CTLA-4 checkpoints is proving to be an effective and durable cancer immunotherapy in a subset of patients.
Journal ArticleDOI

Therapeutic cancer vaccines

TL;DR: The clinical benefit of therapeutic cancer vaccines has been established and the specificity of therapeutic vaccination combined with such immunomodulation offers an attractive avenue for the development of future cancer therapies.
Journal ArticleDOI

CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade: New Immunotherapeutic Modalities with Durable Clinical Benefit in Melanoma Patients

TL;DR: Promising approaches to increase the number of patients with melanoma who benefit from durable responses with immune checkpoint blockade include concurrent or sequenced CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition and combination with other immunotherapeutic strategies.
Journal ArticleDOI

IL-12 and IL-23 cytokines: from discovery to targeted therapies for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases

TL;DR: The therapeutic rationale for targeting these cytokines, the unintended consequences for host defense and tumor surveillance and potential ways in which these therapies can be applied to treat additional immune disorders are discussed.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation.

TL;DR: Recognition of the widespread applicability of these concepts will increasingly affect the development of new means to treat human cancer.
Journal ArticleDOI

Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

TL;DR: The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group criteria for toxicity and response are presented to facilitate future reference and to encourage further standardization among those conducting clinical trials.
Related Papers (5)