scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma

TLDR
Conurrent therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab had a manageable safety profile and provided clinical activity that appears to be distinct from that in published data on monotherapy, with rapid and deep tumor regression in a substantial proportion of patients.
Abstract
A total of 53 patients received concurrent therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab, and 33 received sequenced treatment. The objective-response rate (according to modified World Health Organization criteria) for all patients in the concurrent-regimen group was 40%. Evidence of clinical activity (conventional, unconfirmed, or immune-related response or stable disease for ≥24 weeks) was observed in 65% of patients. At the maximum doses that were associated with an acceptable level of adverse events (nivolumab at a dose of 1 mg per kilogram of body weight and ipilimumab at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram), 53% of patients had an objective response, all with tumor reduction of 80% or more. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events related to therapy occurred in 53% of patients in the concurrent-regimen group but were qualitatively similar to previous experience with monotherapy and were generally reversible. Among patients in the sequenced-regimen group, 18% had grade 3 or 4 adverse events related to therapy and the objective-response rate was 20%. CONCLUSIONS Concurrent therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab had a manageable safety profile and provided clinical activity that appears to be distinct from that in published data on monotherapy, with rapid and deep tumor regression in a substantial proportion of patients. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01024231.)

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Novel immune check point inhibiting antibodies in cancer therapy-Opportunities and challenges.

TL;DR: Defining suitable management algorithms and biomarkers that predict therapeutic effects and adverse toxicity are required to provide survival benefit for larger numbers of cancer patients and are the main focus of immune checkpoint blockade research today.
Journal ArticleDOI

Molecular aberrations, targeted therapy, and renal cell carcinoma: current state-of-the-art

TL;DR: Current understanding of the molecular genetics of RCC is focused on how this may inform therapeutics, and how the most common mutations in clear cell RCC seen in the VHL, PBRM1, BAP1, and SETD2 genes.
Journal ArticleDOI

IL-2 and Beyond in Cancer Immunotherapy.

TL;DR: The development of T- and NK cell growth factors is reviewed and current combinatorial approaches based on these reagents are highlighted, including IL-15 and modified forms of IL-2.
Journal ArticleDOI

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Melanoma Provide the Cornerstones for Curative Therapies

TL;DR: In melanoma anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab) was approved in 2011 and anti-PD-1 (pembrolimumab) in 2014 and another anti- PD-1 antibody has been recently approved based on phase III trial results in metastatic melanoma without BRAF mutation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Gene-expression profiling to predict responsiveness to immunotherapy.

TL;DR: The role that tumor gene-expression profiling (GEP) may have in the prediction of an immunotherapeutic response and the utility of GEP to identify new tumor types for immunotherapy are explored.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation.

TL;DR: Recognition of the widespread applicability of these concepts will increasingly affect the development of new means to treat human cancer.
Journal ArticleDOI

Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

TL;DR: The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group criteria for toxicity and response are presented to facilitate future reference and to encourage further standardization among those conducting clinical trials.
Related Papers (5)