scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma

TLDR
Conurrent therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab had a manageable safety profile and provided clinical activity that appears to be distinct from that in published data on monotherapy, with rapid and deep tumor regression in a substantial proportion of patients.
Abstract
A total of 53 patients received concurrent therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab, and 33 received sequenced treatment. The objective-response rate (according to modified World Health Organization criteria) for all patients in the concurrent-regimen group was 40%. Evidence of clinical activity (conventional, unconfirmed, or immune-related response or stable disease for ≥24 weeks) was observed in 65% of patients. At the maximum doses that were associated with an acceptable level of adverse events (nivolumab at a dose of 1 mg per kilogram of body weight and ipilimumab at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram), 53% of patients had an objective response, all with tumor reduction of 80% or more. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events related to therapy occurred in 53% of patients in the concurrent-regimen group but were qualitatively similar to previous experience with monotherapy and were generally reversible. Among patients in the sequenced-regimen group, 18% had grade 3 or 4 adverse events related to therapy and the objective-response rate was 20%. CONCLUSIONS Concurrent therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab had a manageable safety profile and provided clinical activity that appears to be distinct from that in published data on monotherapy, with rapid and deep tumor regression in a substantial proportion of patients. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01024231.)

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Pharmacogenomic biomarkers for personalized cancer treatment.

TL;DR: Lung and renal cancer, two areas in which huge progress has been made in the last decade, will be used to illustrate advances in personalized cancer treatment and the current challenges and opportunities for pharmacogenomic studies in oncology are reviewed.
Journal ArticleDOI

EBV-associated gastric cancer evades T-cell immunity by PD-1/PD-L1 interactions

TL;DR: EBVaGC cells expressing high levels of PD-L1 suppress T-cell proliferation, and the IFN-γ signaling pathway is involved in the expression of PD -L1.
Journal ArticleDOI

Intratumoral FoxP3+Helios+ Regulatory T Cells Upregulating Immunosuppressive Molecules Are Expanded in Human Colorectal Cancer

TL;DR: Results suggest synergistic associations between PD- 1/CTLA-4 and PD-1/CD39 in dampening T-cell activation and function along with suppressing tumor-specific immune responses, suggesting that dual blockade of these molecules could be a more effective strategy for inducing antitumor immune responses in CRC.
Journal ArticleDOI

New strategies in advanced cervical cancer: from angiogenesis blockade to immunotherapy.

TL;DR: This review will highlight advances in translational science, antiangiogenesis therapy and immunotherapy for advanced disease, and patients with metastatic and nonoperable recurrent cervical cancer constitute a high-risk population with an unmet clinical need.
Journal ArticleDOI

Cost-Effectiveness of Nivolumab-Ipilimumab Combination Therapy Compared with Monotherapy for First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Melanoma in the United States

TL;DR: In a population of 100% PD-L1 negative patients, nivolumab was still the optimal treatment, but combination therapy had an improved incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $295,903 per PFQALY and ipilimumab monotherapy was not the cost-effective choice.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation.

TL;DR: Recognition of the widespread applicability of these concepts will increasingly affect the development of new means to treat human cancer.
Journal ArticleDOI

Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

TL;DR: The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group criteria for toxicity and response are presented to facilitate future reference and to encourage further standardization among those conducting clinical trials.
Related Papers (5)