scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma

TLDR
Conurrent therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab had a manageable safety profile and provided clinical activity that appears to be distinct from that in published data on monotherapy, with rapid and deep tumor regression in a substantial proportion of patients.
Abstract
A total of 53 patients received concurrent therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab, and 33 received sequenced treatment. The objective-response rate (according to modified World Health Organization criteria) for all patients in the concurrent-regimen group was 40%. Evidence of clinical activity (conventional, unconfirmed, or immune-related response or stable disease for ≥24 weeks) was observed in 65% of patients. At the maximum doses that were associated with an acceptable level of adverse events (nivolumab at a dose of 1 mg per kilogram of body weight and ipilimumab at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram), 53% of patients had an objective response, all with tumor reduction of 80% or more. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events related to therapy occurred in 53% of patients in the concurrent-regimen group but were qualitatively similar to previous experience with monotherapy and were generally reversible. Among patients in the sequenced-regimen group, 18% had grade 3 or 4 adverse events related to therapy and the objective-response rate was 20%. CONCLUSIONS Concurrent therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab had a manageable safety profile and provided clinical activity that appears to be distinct from that in published data on monotherapy, with rapid and deep tumor regression in a substantial proportion of patients. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01024231.)

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Immune checkpoint blockade: a common denominator approach to cancer therapy

TL;DR: The immune system recognizes and is poised to eliminate cancer but is held in check by inhibitory receptors and ligands, so drugs interrupting immune checkpoints, such as anti-CTLA-4, anti-PD-1, and others in early development, can unleash anti-tumor immunity and mediate durable cancer regressions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Adverse Renal Effects of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Narrative Review.

TL;DR: Although initially thought to be rare, the incidence rates of renal toxicities might be higher as identified by recent studies, Steroids appear to be effective in treating the immune-related adverse effects noted with these agents.
Journal ArticleDOI

Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma

TL;DR: Overall survival and objective response rates were significantly higher with nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with sunitinib among intermediate‐ and poor‐risk patients with previously untreated advanced renal‐cell carcinoma.
Journal ArticleDOI

Atezolizumab in patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have progressed following treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy: A single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial

TL;DR: Treatment with atezolizumab resulted in a significantly improved RECIST v1.1 response rate, compared with a historical control overall response rate of 10%, and Exploratory analyses showed The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) subtypes and mutation load to be independently predictive for response to atezolediazepine.
Journal ArticleDOI

Molecular and cellular insights into T cell exhaustion

TL;DR: Recent advances that provide a clearer molecular understanding of T cell exhaustion are reviewed and reveal new therapeutic targets for persisting infections and cancer.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation.

TL;DR: Recognition of the widespread applicability of these concepts will increasingly affect the development of new means to treat human cancer.
Journal ArticleDOI

Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

TL;DR: The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group criteria for toxicity and response are presented to facilitate future reference and to encourage further standardization among those conducting clinical trials.
Related Papers (5)