scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

The dimensionality of ecological networks

TLDR
It is shown that accounting for a few traits dramatically improves the understanding of the structure of ecological networks, and matching traits for resources and consumers, for example, fruit size and bill gape, are the most successful combinations.
Abstract
How many dimensions (trait-axes) are required to predict whether two species interact? This unanswered question originated with the idea of ecological niches, and yet bears relevance today for understanding what determines network structure. Here, we analyse a set of 200 ecological networks, including food webs, antagonistic and mutualistic networks, and find that the number of dimensions needed to completely explain all interactions is small ( < 10), with model selection favouring less than five. Using 18 high-quality webs including several species traits, we identify which traits contribute the most to explaining network structure. We show that accounting for a few traits dramatically improves our understanding of the structure of ecological networks. Matching traits for resources and consumers, for example, fruit size and bill gape, are the most successful combinations. These results link ecologically important species attributes to large-scale community structure.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Ecological Networks Across Environmental Gradients

TL;DR: Taking spatial and temporal processes into account can further elucidate network variation and improve predictions of network responses to environmental change.
Journal ArticleDOI

Inferring biotic interactions from proxies

TL;DR: This work proposes a conceptual framework to infer the backbone of biotic interaction networks within regional species pools, and concludes that preliminary descriptions of the web of life can be made by careful integration of data with theory.
Journal ArticleDOI

Complexity and stability of ecological networks: a review of the theory

TL;DR: The use of ecological-network models to study the relationship between complexity and stability of natural ecosystems is the focus of this review, highlighting the theoretical debate and the lack of consensual agreement.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Plant-hummingbird interactions in the West Indies: floral specialisation gradients associated with environment and hummingbird size

TL;DR: Using nonmetric multidimensional scaling analysis, it is shown that hummingbird-pollinated plants in the West Indies separate in floral phenotypic space into two gradients—one associated with the abiotic environment and another with hummingbird size, which illustrates that, even within the hummingbirds' pollination flora, pollination syndrome and the degree of specialisation may vary tremendously depending on pollinator morphology and environment.
Book ChapterDOI

Food webs, competition graphs, and the boxicity of ecological phase space

TL;DR: The problem of representing the competition graph as an intersection graph of boxes (k-dimensional rectangles representing ecological niches) in Euclidean k-space is described and the class of graphs which arise as competition graphs of (acyclic) food webs are discussed.
Book ChapterDOI

Scaling of Food-Web Properties with Diversity and Complexity Across Ecosystems

TL;DR: This work analysed the scaling behaviour of 16 topological parameters and found significant power–law scaling relationships with diversity and complexity for most of them, illustrating the lack of universal constants in food-web ecology as a function of diversity or complexity.
Journal ArticleDOI

The signature of phylogenetic constraints on food-web structure

TL;DR: The exploration of the relationship between trophic and taxonomic similarity in food-webs shows that phylogeny and Trophic structure are closely linked, and it is important to understand how evolutionary processes shaping body sizes can affect food-web structure.
Related Papers (5)