Showing papers on "Lovastatin published in 1997"

Lovastatin and phenylacetate inhibit the induction of nitric oxide synthase and cytokines in rat primary astrocytes, microglia, and macrophages.

Abstract: This study explores the role of mevalonate inhibitors in the activation of NF-kbeta and the induction of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and cytokines (TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, and IL-6) in rat primary astrocytes, microglia, and macrophages Lovastatin and sodium phenylacetate (NaPA) were found to inhibit LPS- and cytokine-mediated production of NO and expression of iNOS in rat primary astrocytes; this inhibition was not due to depletion of end products of mevalonate pathway (eg, cholesterol and ubiquinone) Reversal of the inhibitory effect of lovastatin on LPS-induced iNOS expression by mevalonate and farnesyl pyrophosphate and reversal of the inhibitory effect of NaPA on LPS-induced iNOS expression by farnesyl pyrophosphate, however, suggests a role of farnesylation in the LPS-mediated induction of iNOS The inhibition of LPS-mediated induction of iNOS by FPT inhibitor II, an inhibitor of Ras farnesyl protein transferase, suggests that farnesylation of p21(ras) or other proteins regulates the induction of iNOS Inhibition of LPS-mediated activation of NF-kbeta by lovastatin, NaPA, and FPT inhibitor II in astrocytes indicates that the observed inhibition of iNOS expression is mediated via inhibition of NF-kbeta activation In addition to iNOS, lovastatin and NaPA also inhibited LPS-induced expression of TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, and IL-6 in rat primary astrocytes, microglia, and macrophages This study delineates a novel role of the mevalonate pathway in controlling the expression of iNOS and different cytokines in rat astrocytes, microglia, and macrophages that may be important in developing therapeutics against cytokine- and NO-mediated neurodegenerative diseases

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Similarities and differences.

Abstract: Hypercholesterolaemia plays a crucial role in the development of atherosclerotic diseases in general and coronary heart disease in particular. The risk of progression of the atherosclerotic process to coronary heart disease increases progressively with increasing levels of total serum cholesterol or low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol at both the individual and the population level. The statins are reversible inhibitors of the microsomal enzyme HMG-CoA reductase, which converts HMG-CoAto mevalonate. This is an early rate-limiting step in cholesterol biosynthesis. Inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase by statins decreases intracellular cholesterol biosynthesis, which then leads to transcriptionally upregulated production of microsomal HMG-CoA reductase and cell surface LDL receptors. Subsequently, additional cholesterol is provided to the cell by de novo synthesis and by receptor-mediated uptake of LDL-cholesterol from the blood. This resets intracellular cholesterol homeostasis in extrahepatic tissues, but has little effect on the overall cholesterol balance. There are no simple methods to investigate the concentration-dependent inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase in human pharmacodynamic studies. The main clinical variable is plasma LDL-cholesterol, which takes 4 to 6 weeks to show a reduction after the start of statin treatment. Consequently, a dose-effect rather than a concentration-effect relationship is more appropriate to use in describing the pharmacodynamics. Fluvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin and simvastatin have similar pharmacodynamic properties; all can reduce LDL-cholesterol by 20 to 35%, a reduction which has been shown to achieve decreases of 30 to 35% in major cardiovascular outcomes. Simvastatin has this effect at doses of about half those of the other 3 statins. The liver is the target organ for the statins, since it is the major site of cholesterol biosynthesis, lipoprotein production and LDLcatabolism. However, cholesterol biosynthesis in extrahepatic tissues is necessary for normal cell function. The adverse effects of HMG-reductase inhibitors during long term treatment may depend in part upon the degree to which they act in extrahepatic tissues. Therefore, pharmacokinetic factors such as hepatic extraction and systemic exposure to active compound(s) may be clinically important when comparing the statins. Different degrees of liver selectivity have been claimed for the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. However, the literature contains confusing data concerning the degree of liver versus tissue selectivity. Human pharmacokinetic data are poor and incomplete, especially for lovastatin and simvastatin, and it is clear that any conclusion on tissue selectivity is dependent upon the choice of experimental model. However, the drugs do differ in some important aspects concerning the degree of metabolism and the number of active and inactive metabolites. The rather extensive metabolism by different cytochrome P450 isoforms also makes it difficult to characterise these drugs regarding tissue selectivity unless all metabolites are well characterised. The effective elimination half-lives of the hydroxy acid forms of the 4 statins are 0.7 to 3.0 hours. Protein binding is similar (>90%) for fluvastatin, lovastatin and simvastatin, but it is only 50% for pravastatin. The best characterised statins from a clinical pharmacokinetic standpoint are fluvastatin and pravastatin. The major difference between these 2 compounds is the higher liver extraction of fluvastatin during the absorption phase compared with pravastatin (67 versus 45%, respectively, in the same dose range). Estimates of liver extraction in humans for lovastatin and simvastatin are poorly reported, which makes a direct comparison difficult.

Atorvastatin. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic potential in the management of hyperlipidaemias.

Abstract: Atorvastatin is a synthetic HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor which lowers plasma cholesterol levels by inhibiting endogenous cholesterol synthesis. It also reduces triglyceride levels through an as yet unproven mechanism. Dose-dependent reductions in total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol and triglyceride levels have been observed with atorvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolaemia and in patients with hypertriglyceridaemia. In large trials involving patients with hypercholesterolaemia, atorvastatin produced greater reductions in total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, apolipoprotein B and triglyceride levels than lovastatin, pravastatin and simvastatin. In patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia, the combination of atorvastatin and colestipol tended to produce larger reductions in LDL-cholesterol levels and smaller reductions in triglyceride levels than atorvastatin monotherapy. Although atorvastatin induced smaller reductions in triglyceride levels and more modest increases in high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol levels than either fenofibrate or nicotinic acid in patients with combined hyperlipidaemia, it produced larger reductions in total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol. As with other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, the most frequently reported adverse events associated with atorvastatin are gastrointestinal effects. In comparative trials, atorvastatin had a similar adverse event profile to that of other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Clinical data with atorvastatin are limited at present. However, with its ability to markedly reduce LDL-cholesterol levels, atorvastatin is likely to join other members of its class as a first-line agent for the treatment of patients with hypercholesterolaemia, if changes in lipid levels with atorvastatin convert to reductions in CHD mortality and morbidity. Atorvastatin may be particularly suitable for patients with heterozygous or homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia because of the marked reductions in LDL-cholesterol experienced with the drug. Additionally, because of its triglyceride-lowering properties, atorvastatin appears to have the potential to become an appropriate treatment for patients with combined hyperlipidaemia or hypertriglyceridaemia.

Dietary l-Arginine Reduces the Progression of Atherosclerosis in Cholesterol-Fed Rabbits Comparison With Lovastatin

Abstract: Background We investigated whether l-arginine induces regression of preexisting atheromatous lesions and reversal of endothelial dysfunction in hypercholesterolemic rabbits, whether similar effects can be obtained by cholesterol-lowering therapy with lovastatin, and which mechanism leads to these effects. Methods and Results Rabbits were fed 1% cholesterol for 4 weeks and 0.5% cholesterol for an additional 12 weeks. Two groups of cholesterol-fed rabbits were treated with l-arginine (2.0% in drinking water) or lovastatin (10 mg/d) during weeks 5 through 16. Systemic nitric oxide (NO) formation was assessed as the urinary excretion rates of nitrate and cGMP in weekly intervals. Cholesterol feeding progressively reduced urinary nitrate excretion to ≈40% of baseline (P<.05) and increased plasma concentrations of asymmetrical dimethylarginine (ADMA), an endogenous NO synthesis inhibitor. Dietary l-arginine reversed the reduction in plasma l-arginine/ADMA ratio and partly restored urinary excretion of nitrate a...

Comparison of One-Year Efficacy and Safety of Atorvastatin Versus Lovastatin in Primary Hypercholesterolemia

Abstract: This double-blind study to evaluate long-term efficacy and safety of atorvastatin was performed in 31 community- and university-based research centers in the USA to directly compare a new 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor (reductase inhibitor) to an accepted drug of this class in patients with moderate hypercholesterolemia. Participants remained on a cholesterol-lowering diet throughout the study. One thousand forty-nine patients were randomized to receive atorvastatin 10 mg, lovastatin 20 mg, or placebo. At 16 weeks the placebo group was randomized to either atorvastatin or lovastatin treatment. At 22 weeks, patients who had not met low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol target levels doubled the dose of reductase inhibitor. Efficacy evaluation was mean percent change from baseline in LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, total cholesterol, high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B (apoB). Safety profiles as determined by change from baseline in laboratory evaluations, ophthalmologic parameters, and reporting of adverse events were similar for the 2 reductase inhibitors. After 52 weeks, the atorvastatin group maintained a significantly greater reduction in LDL cholesterol (-37% vs -29%), triglyceride (-16% vs -8%), total cholesterol (-27% vs -21%), and apoB (-30% vs -22%) (p <0.05). More patients receiving atorvastatin achieved LDL cholesterol target levels than did lovastatin patients (78% vs 63%, respectively), particularly those with coronary heart disease (37% vs 11%, respectively). Atorvastatin is highly effective and well tolerated in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia with no increased risk of adverse events.

Effect of Cholesterol Reduction on Myocardial Ischemia in Patients With Coronary Disease

Abstract: Background Cholesterol lowering is associated with a reduction in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. This study sought to determine whether cholesterol lowering also results in a reduction of myocardial ischemia during daily life. Methods and Results We enrolled 40 patients with proven coronary artery disease, total serum cholesterol between 191 and 327 mg/dL, and at least one episode of ST-segment depression on ambulatory ECG monitoring. Twenty patients were randomized to an American Heart Association Step 1 diet plus placebo (placebo group) and 20 to the same diet plus lovastatin (treatment group). Serum cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels and ambulatory monitoring were repeated after 4 to 6 months of therapy. The two groups were comparable with respect to baseline characteristics, number of episodes of ST-segment depression, and baseline serum cholesterol levels. The treatment group had lower mean total and LDL cholesterol levels at study end and experienced a significant reduction in the numbe...

The Role of Triglyceride-Rich Lipoprotein Families in the Progression of Atherosclerotic Lesions as Determined by Sequential Coronary Angiography From a Controlled Clinical Trial

Abstract: We have demonstrated previously in a subset of Monitored Atherosclerosis Regression Study (MARS) subjects with hypercholesterolemia (190 to 295 mg/dL) and documented coronary artery disease that lovastatin significantly reduces cholesterol-rich lipoprotein B (LpB) but has little effect on complex, triglyceride-rich apolipoprotein (apo) B–containing LpBc (the sum of LpB:C, LpB:C:E and LpA-II:B:C:D:E) particles defined by their apolipoprotein composition. This differential effect of lovastatin on apoB-containing lipoprotein families offered the opportunity to determine in the same subset of MARS subjects the independent relationship of LpB and LpBc with the progression of coronary artery disease. Subjects randomized to either lovastatin (40 mg twice daily) or matching placebo were evaluated by coronary angiography before randomization and after 2 years of treatment, and the overall coronary status was judged by a coronary global change score. In the lovastatin-treated group, there were 22 nonprogre...

Lovastatin increases exercise-induced skeletal muscle injury☆

Abstract: This study tested the hypothesis that exercise in combination with a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor produces greater creatine kinase (CK) elevations, an index of skeletal muscle injury, than exercise alone, using a double-blind, placebo-controlled design. Fifty-nine healthy men aged 18 to 65 years with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels greater than 3.36 mmol/L (130 mg/dL) despite diet therapy were studied. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive lovastatin (40 mg/d) or placebo for 5 weeks. Subjects completed 45 minutes of downhill treadmill walking (-15% grade) at 65% of their predetermined maximum heart rate after 4 weeks of treatment. During the subsequent week, they completed four 10-repetition sets of one-arm biceps curl exercise using 50% of their maximum capacity. CK levels were measured before exercise and daily for 4 and 5 days after the treadmill and biceps exercises, respectively. Age, body weight, and blood lipid and lipoprotein levels were similar in lovastatin and placebo groups. Resting CK levels were 33% higher in the lovastatin group before treatment (P < .05), but were not significantly altered by lovastatin. CK levels were 62% and 77% higher (P < .05) in the lovastatin group 24 and 48 hours after treadmill exercise after adjusting for initial CK differences. There were no significant CK differences between lovastatin and placebo groups after biceps curl exercise. We conclude that HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors exacerbate exercise-induced skeletal muscle injury.

A multicenter, double-blind, one-year study comparing safety and efficacy of atorvastatin versus simvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia

Abstract: We directly compared the safety and efficacy of atorvastatin and simvastatin in hypercholesterolemic patients. This 1-year, randomized, double-blind study was performed at 9 community- and university-based research hospitals in Australia. One-hundred seventy-seven patients between the ages of 18 and 80 years with baseline low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol > or = 4.14 and < or = 7.76 mmol/L (160 and 300 mg/dl, respectively) and triglycerides < or = 4.52 mmol/L (400 mg/dl) received once-daily dosing with atorvastatin (Lipitor) 10 mg or simvastatin (Zocor) 10 mg. At week 16, the dose of medication was titrated to atorvastatin 20 mg or simvastatin 20 mg if patients did not meet LDL cholesterol target of < or = 3.36 mmol/L (130 mg/dl). Efficacy was reported as percent change from baseline in LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, very low density lipoprotein cholesterol, total triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoproteins AI and B, and lipoprotein(a). Atorvastatin caused significantly greater reductions from baseline than did simvastatin for LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, very low density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and apolipoprotein B (p <0.05). No patient in either treatment group had clinically important elevations in creatine phosphokinase, alanine aminotransaminase, or aspartate aminotransaminase. No serious adverse events were considered associated with treatment. With atorvastatin 10 mg, 46% of the patients achieved LDL cholesterol target goal by week 16, whereas only 27% of the simvastatin patients achieved the target goal at the 10-mg dose. This cholesterol-lowering profile affords utility in many patient types.

Accumulation of lovastatin, but not pravastatin, in the blood of cyclosporine-treated kidney graft patients after multiple doses.

Abstract: Objectives To study pravastatin and lovastatin pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects and their interactions with cyclosporine (INN, ciclosporin) in kidney transplant patients after single and multiple doses. Subjects and methods The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of administration of 20 mg/day oral pravastatin and lovastatin for 28 days and their interactions with cyclosporine (2 to 6 mg/kg/day) were studied in a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, parallel-group multicenter trial in 44 stable kidney graft recipients. Results The median area under the curve [AUC(0–24)] of pravastatin was 249 μg · hr/L (range, 104 to 1026 μg · hr/L) after a single dose (day 1) and 241 μg · hr/L (114 to 969 μg · hr/L) after multiple doses (day 28) and was fivefold higher than values reported in the absence of cyclosporine. The median AUC(0–24) of lovastatin was 243 μg · hr/L (105 to 858 μg · hr/L) on day 1 and 459 μg · hr/L (140 to 1508 μg · hr/L) on day 28. Besides a significant accumulation during the study period (p < 0.001), the lovastatin AUC(0–24) values were twentyfold higher than values reported without cyclosporine. Coadministration of pravastatin or lovastatin did not alter cyclosporine pharmacokinetics. In this study, 20 mg/day doses of both drugs resulted in a significant improvement of the lipid profile and were well tolerated. Conclusions In contrast to lovastatin, pravastatin did not accumulate over the study period, which is probably one of the reasons rhabdomyolysis has been reported in lovastatin-treated but not pravastatin-treated transplant patients receiving cyclosporine immunosuppression. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (1997) 62, 311–321; doi:

Lovastatin Prevents Steroid Induced Adipogenesis and Osteonecrosis

Abstract: Osteonecrosis of the femoral head was induced experimentally in chickens after the administration of a high dose of corticosteroids. Lovastatin was used to prevent the effects of the steroid on adipogenesis in cultured cells, and adipogenesis and osteonecrosis in chickens. The in vitro study, with marrow cells in culture, showed that Lovastatin inhibited steroid induced fat specific gene expression and counteracted the inhibitory effects of steroids on osteoblastic gene expression. For the in vivo study, 83 adult chickens were used: 48 received methylprednisolone 3 mg/kg weekly via intramuscular injection (Group A). Fifteen received the steroid (as in Group A) plus Lovastatin 20 mg per animal per day orally (Group B). Ten chickens received Lovastatin only (Group C). Another 10 received no medication and served as the control group (Group D). Evidence of osteonecrosis was observed in specimens from Group A, including subchondral bone death and resorption, fat cell proliferation, and new bone formation. Conversely, sections from Group B showed less adipogenesis and no bone death. It is concluded that the bipedal chicken is a useful animal model for studies of osteonecrosis and that lipid clearing agents, such as Lovastatin, may be helpful in preventing the development of steroid induced osteonecrosis.

The Otto Aufranc Award. Lovastatin prevents steroid induced adipogenesis and osteonecrosis.

Abstract: Osteonecrosis of the femoral head was induced experimentally in chickens after the administration of a high dose of corticosteroids. Lovastatin was used to prevent the effects of the steroid on adipogenesis in cultured cells, and adipogenesis and osteonecrosis in chickens. The in vitro study, with marrow cells in culture, showed that Lovastatin inhibited steroid induced fat specific gene expression and counteracted the inhibitory effects of steroids on osteoblastic gene expression. For the in vivo study, 83 adult chickens were used: 48 received methylprednisolone 3 mg/kg weekly via intramuscular injection (Group A). Fifteen received the steroid (as in Group A) plus Lovastatin 20 mg per animal per day orally (Group B). Ten chickens received Lovastatin only (Group C). Another 10 received no medication and served as the control group (Group D). Evidence of osteonecrosis was observed in specimens from Group A, including subchondral bone death and resorption, fat cell proliferation, and new bone formation. Conversely, sections from Group B showed less adipogenesis and no bone death. It is concluded that the bipedal chicken is a useful animal model for studies of osteonecrosis and that lipid clearing agents, such as Lovastatin, may be helpful in preventing the development of steroid induced osteonecrosis.

Lipid lowering: an important factor in preventing adriamycin-induced heart failure.

Abstract: The contribution of lipid lowering in protection against adriamycin cardiomyopathy achieved by probucol, an antioxidant and a lipid-lowering drug, was assessed by comparing its beneficial effects with that of lovastatin, another lipid-lowering drug with no known antioxidant properties. Adriamycin (cumulative dose, 15 mg/kg body weight) was given to rats in 6 equal injections (intraperitoneally) over a period of 2 weeks. Probucol (cumulative dose, 120 mg/kg body weight) or lovastatin (cumulative dose, 48 mg/kg body weight) was given in 12 equal injections (intraperitoneally) before and concurrent with adriamycin. After 3 weeks of post-treatment with adriamycin, congestive heart failure, ascites, congested liver, and depressed cardiac function were seen. Adriamycin treatment decreased glutathione peroxidase activity and increased lipid peroxidation. Adriamycin increased plasma triglycerides, total cholesterol, and high- and low-density lipoproteins. Myocardial triglycerides and total cholesterol were also increased. Probucol completely prevented the development of congestive heart failure and normalized myocardial and plasma triglycerides and total cholesterol, and significantly decreased plasma high- and low-density lipoproteins. Lovastatin significantly attenuated but did not completely prevent cardiomyopathic changes due to adriamycin. Lovastatin decreased plasma total cholesterol and low-density lipoproteins as well as myocardial triglycerides and total cholesterol. Plasma triglycerides and high-density lipoproteins were still high in the adriamycin plus lovastatin group. Probucol improved glutathione peroxidase activity and reduced lipid peroxidation whereas lovastatin had no effect on these adriamycin-induced changes. These data suggest that adriamycin cardiomyopathy is associated with an antioxidant deficit as well as increased myocardial and plasma lipids. Complete protection by probucol against adriamycin-induced congestive heart failure may be due to the unique combination of its antioxidant and lipid-lowering properties.

Lovastatin Induction of Cyclin-dependent Kinase Inhibitors in Human Breast Cells Occurs in a Cell Cycle-independent Fashion

Abstract: Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CKIs) p21, p27, p16, and p15 are an essential and integral part of cell cycle regulation. Studies on the expression of these inhibitors in normal versus tumor human breast cancer cells revealed that although p27 and p16 are expressed at higher levels in tumor cells, p21 and p15 expression were higher in normal cells. Analysis on the expression pattern of these proteins throughout the cell cycle in synchronized cells demonstrated a substantial increase in p21 during the S-phase in normal cells and barely detectable expression of p21 in any phase of the tumor cell cycle. Levels of p15, p16, and p27 remained relatively constant throughout the cell cycle of normal and tumor cells. Synchronization of tumor cells by lovastatin, which arrests cells in G1, resulted in increased levels of p21 and p27 with a concomitant decrease in cyclin-dependent kinase 2-associated kinase activity. Synchronization of cells by double-thymidine block did not result in the induction of p21 or p27. These observations suggest that lovastatin causes a profound cell cycle-independent alteration of CKI expression which is distinct from growth factor deprivation or thymidine block.

Effect of pharmacologic lipid lowering on health-related quality of life in older persons: results from the Cholesterol Reduction in Seniors Program (CRISP) Pilot Study

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of lovastatin therapy on health-related quality of life in older persons. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, double blind clinical trial. SETTING: Four university medical center research clinics. PARTICIPANTS: There were 431 men and women, primarily 65 years of age or older, with low density lipoprotein levels greater than 159 mg/dL and less than 221 mg/dL. Exclusion criteria included a Mini-Mental state score less than 24 or presence of recent cardiovascular events or other serious chronic disease likely to shorten survival. INTERVENTION: All participants were administered the National Cholesterol Education Program step one diet and were then randomized to placebo, 20 mg lovastatin, or 40 mg lovastatin. MEASUREMENTS: Areas of health-related quality of life assessed in the Cholesterol Reduction in Seniors Program (CRISP) included: (1) physical functioning, (2) sleep behavior, (3) social support, (4) depression, (5) cognitive function, and (6) health perception. Three global change questions asked the patients to judge change in general health since starting the study diet or the study medication and change in ability to function or care for self. Although some patients were followed for a total of 12 months, all participants were followed for 6 months, and 6-month data have been used for the primary analysis in this paper. RESULTS: Patients treated with 20 mg of lovastatin had a 17% and 24% reduction in total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol, respectively. Patients treated with the 40-mg lovastatin dose achieved reductions of 20% for total cholesterol and 28% for LDL-cholesterol. Complaints of possible adverse events were remarkably similar in the two active treatment groups and the placebo group. At 6 months of follow-up there were no statistically significant differences found in mean change scores from baseline between treatment groups on the health-related quality of life measures (physical functioning, sleep, social support, depression, cognitive function scales, health perception) or global questions. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that lovastatin was extremely well tolerated in an older cohort, both with regard to symptoms and to health-related quality of life.

Lovastatin-Induced Apoptosis in Prostate Stromal Cells

Abstract: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common disease of aging men. Current medical treatment for this condition is only partially effective, therefore many patients must undergo surgery for symptomatic relief. BPH is caused by an increase in prostate epithelial and stromal cells, especially the latter. Since BPH stromal cells have a long life span and are not very responsive to androgen withdrawal, cultured BPH stromal cells were used to explore the feasibility of pharmacologically inducing apoptosis in these cells. We obtained BPH tissue during surgery, and stromal cells were isolated and maintained in culture. After cells achieved confluence, we induced apoptosis with the HMGCoA reductase inhibitor, lovastatin (30 micromol/L). The effects of testosterone (100 micromol/L), dihydrotestosterone (DHT; 100 micromol/L) and finasteride (100 micromol/L) on lovastatin-induced apoptosis were studied on cells grown in media containing charcoal stripped serum. Similarly, we examined the effect of the cholesterol pathway metabolites, mevalonic acid (30 micromol/L), geranyl geraniol (30 micromol/L), farnesol (10 micromol/L), squalene (30 micromol/L) and 7-ketocholesterol (3 micromol/L) on lovastatin-induced apoptosis. We demonstrated apoptosis by DNA laddering in agarose gels, by fluorescence microscopy following acridine orange staining, and by flow cytometry after end-labeling of DNA strand breaks with biotin-16-dUTP using deoxynucleotidyl exotransferase (TdT). Lovastatin at 30 micromol/L, but not at lower concentrations, induced apoptosis in BPH prostate stromal cells. This was seen (by flow cytometry) in 16.6 +/- 7.3% (mean +/- SD) of BPH cells treated with lovastatin at 72 h vs. 2.5 +/- 1.2% of cells treated with ethanol. Lovastatin-induced apoptosis was not increased in stripped serum or by the addition finasteride, and was not inhibited by testosterone or DHT. Only mevalonate and geranyl geraniol, prevented lovastatin-induced apoptosis whereas farnesol, squalene, or 7-ketocholesterol did not. We conclude that lovastatin can induce apoptosis in BPH stromal cells in vitro, and this is not affected by androgen withdrawal or stimulation. It is unlikely that lovastatin, per se, will be an effective treatment for BPH in vivo, but it does provide a means for inducing apoptosis in vitro. Understanding the apoptotic process in BPH stromal cells ultimately may lead to new therapeutic strategies for BPH.

Lovastatin prevents development of hypertension in spontaneously hypertensive rats

Abstract: The present study evaluated the effects of lovastatin on renal function and the development of hypertension in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Four-week-old SHR were given lovastati...

A Comparison of The Effect of the 3-Hydroxy-3- Methylglutaryl Coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) Reductase Inhibitors Simvastatin, Lovastatin and Pravastatin on Leukaemic and Normal Bone Marrow Progenitors

Abstract: Simvastatin is an inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase and also selectively inhibits the growth of leukaemic progenitor cells. The antileukaemic action of simvastatin was compared in vitro with that of lovastatin and pravastatin, chemically related compounds which are also competitive inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase. After 18 hours incubation with 2.5-20 μM of inhibitor, no effect was observed by any of the compounds on the subsequent clonogenic growth of normal bone marrow (BM) progenitor cells from 4 donors and BM cells from one patient in remission. However, simvastatin and lovastatin produced inhibition of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) progenitor cell growth of between 25% and 100% in 5 populations tested (4 primary AMLs and the HL60 cell line). Pravastatin showed similar growth inhibitory effects to simvastatin and lovastatin in 2 out of 3 primary AMLs but was less active against one primary AML cell population and HL60 cells. These results indicate that, in addition...

Role of Rho Protein in Lovastatin-Induced Breakdown of Actin Cytoskeleton

Abstract: The Rho GTPases are involved in actin cytoskeleton organization and signal transduction. They need polyisoprenylation for membrane association and activation. Lovastatin, a hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A inhibitor, prevents isoprene synthesis and thereby lipid modification of the Rho protein carboxy terminus. Because lovastatin causes rounding up of cultured cells, we investigated whether the compound acts on the actin cytoskeleton through Rho proteins. Lovastatin treatment decreased F-actin content in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. G-actin content remained unchanged. In lovastatin-treated NIH 3T3 cells, the amount of Rho protein which was ADP-ribosylated by Clostridium botulinum exoenzyme C3 decreased in membranes and increased in the cytosol fraction. Cycloheximide prevented lovastatin-induced rounding up of cells. However, after microinjection or direct application of exoenzyme C3, cells treated with cycloheximide and lovastatin rounded up again. On the contrary, lovastatin-treated, round Swiss 3T3 cells reverted to a flat morphology when microinjected with dominant active RhoA (Val14RhoA). Escherichia coli cytotoxic necrotizing factor (CNF1) which activates Rho proteins caused flattening of round, lovastatin-treated NIH 3T3 cells. These results suggest that lovastatin affects the actin cytoskeleton through inactivation of Rho proteins.