Showing papers by "Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak published in 2019"

T-Cell–Inflamed Gene-Expression Profile, Programmed Death Ligand 1 Expression, and Tumor Mutational Burden Predict Efficacy in Patients Treated With Pembrolizumab Across 20 Cancers: KEYNOTE-028

Abstract: PURPOSEBiomarkers that can predict response to anti–programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) therapy across multiple tumor types include a T-cell–inflamed gene-expression profile (GEP), programmed death liga...

Validation of CyTOF Against Flow Cytometry for Immunological Studies and Monitoring of Human Cancer Clinical Trials.

Abstract: Flow cytometry is a widely applied approach for exploratory immune profiling and biomarker discovery in cancer and other diseases. However, flow cytometry is limited by the number of parameters that can be simultaneously analyzed, severely restricting its utility. Recently, the advent of mass cytometry (CyTOF) has enabled high dimensional and unbiased examination of the immune system, allowing simultaneous interrogation of a large number of parameters. This is important for deep interrogation of immune responses and particularly when sample sizes are limited (such as in tumors). Our goal was to compare the accuracy and reproducibility of CyTOF against flow cytometry as a reliable analytic tool for human PBMC and tumor tissues for cancer clinical trials. We developed a 40+ parameter CyTOF panel and demonstrate that compared to flow cytometry, CyTOF yields analogous quantification of cell lineages in conjunction with markers of cell differentiation, function, activation, and exhaustion for use with fresh and viably frozen PBMC or tumor tissues. Further, we provide a protocol that enables reliable quantification by CyTOF down to low numbers of input human cells, an approach that is particularly important when cell numbers are limiting. Thus, we validate CyTOF as an accurate approach to perform high dimensional analysis in human tumor tissue and to utilize low cell numbers for subsequent immunologic studies and cancer clinical trials.

Hyperprogressive disease in early-phase immunotherapy trials: Clinical predictors and association with immune-related toxicities.

Abstract: BACKGROUND A subset of patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors experience an accelerated tumor growth rate (TGR) in comparison with pretreatment kinetics; this is known as hyperprogression. This study assessed the relation between hyperprogressive disease (HPD) and treatment-related toxicity and clinical factors. METHODS This study reviewed patients with solid tumors who were enrolled in early-phase immunotherapy trials at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre between August 2012 and September 2016 and had computed tomography scans in the pre-immunotherapy (reference) and on-immunotherapy (experimental) periods. HPD was defined as progression according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 at the first on-treatment scan and a ≥2-fold increase in TGR between the reference and experimental periods. Treatment-related toxicities requiring systemic therapy, drug delays, or discontinuation were considered clinically significant adverse events (CSAEs). RESULTS Of 352 patients, 182 were eligible for analysis. The median age was 60 years, and 54% were male. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0 (32%) or 1 (68%). The Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) prognostic score was 0/1 in 59%. Single-agent immunotherapy was given to 80% of the patients. Most patients (89%) received anti-programmed death (ligand) 1 antibodies alone or in combination with other therapies. HPD occurred in 12 of 182 patients (7%). A higher proportion of females was seen among HPD patients (P = .01), but no association with age, performance status, tumor type, RMH prognostic score, combination immunotherapy, or CSAEs was found. The 1-year overall survival rate was 28% for HPD patients and 53% for non-HPD patients (hazard ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-3.3; P = .11). CONCLUSIONS HPD was observed in 7% of patients with solid tumors treated with immunotherapy. HPD was not associated with CSAEs, age, tumor type, or the type of immunotherapy but was more common in females.

Systemic and local immunity following adoptive transfer of NY-ESO-1 SPEAR T cells in synovial sarcoma

Abstract: Gene-modified autologous T cells expressing NY-ESO-1c259, an affinity-enhanced T-cell receptor (TCR) reactive against the NY-ESO-1-specific HLA-A*02-restricted peptide SLLMWITQC (NY-ESO-1 SPEAR T-cells; GSK 794), have demonstrated clinical activity in patients with advanced synovial sarcoma (SS). The factors contributing to gene-modified T-cell expansion and the changes within the tumor microenvironment (TME) following T-cell infusion remain unclear. These studies address the immunological mechanisms of response and resistance in patients with SS treated with NY-ESO-1 SPEAR T-cells. Four cohorts were included to evaluate antigen expression and preconditioning on efficacy. Clinical responses were assessed by RECIST v1.1. Engineered T-cell persistence was determined by qPCR. Serum cytokines were evaluated by immunoassay. Transcriptomic analyses and immunohistochemistry were performed on tumor biopsies from patients before and after T-cell infusion. Gene-modified T-cells were detected within the TME via an RNAish assay. Responses across cohorts were affected by preconditioning and intra-tumoral NY-ESO-1 expression. Of the 42 patients reported (data cut-off 4June2018), 1 patient had a complete response, 14 patients had partial responses, 24 patients had stable disease, and 3 patients had progressive disease. The magnitude of gene-modified T-cell expansion shortly after infusion was associated with response in patients with high intra-tumoral NY-ESO-1 expression. Patients receiving a fludarabine-containing conditioning regimen experienced increases in serum IL-7 and IL-15. Prior to infusion, the TME exhibited minimal leukocyte infiltration; CD163+ tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) were the dominant population. Modest increases in intra-tumoral leukocytes (≤5%) were observed in a subset of subjects at approximately 8 weeks. Beyond 8 weeks post infusion, the TME was minimally infiltrated with a TAM-dominant leukocyte infiltrate. Tumor-associated antigens and antigen presentation did not significantly change within the tumor post-T-cell infusion. Finally, NY-ESO-1 SPEAR T cells trafficked to the TME and maintained cytotoxicity in a subset of patients. Our studies elucidate some factors that underpin response and resistance to NY-ESO-1 SPEAR T-cell therapy. From these data, we conclude that a lymphodepletion regimen containing high doses of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide is necessary for SPEAR T-cell persistence and efficacy. Furthermore, these data demonstrate that non-T-cell inflamed tumors, which are resistant to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, can be treated with adoptive T-cell based immunotherapy. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01343043 , Registered 27 April 2011.

ANNOUNCE: A randomized, placebo (PBO)-controlled, double-blind, phase (Ph) III trial of doxorubicin (dox) + olaratumab versus dox + PBO in patients (pts) with advanced soft tissue sarcomas (STS).

Abstract: LBA3Background: Dox is standard therapy in STS. In a Ph 2 trial, olaratumab (a human IgG1 antibody targeting PDGFRα) + dox improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) vs dox....

Phase I Study of BI 853520, an Inhibitor of Focal Adhesion Kinase, in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Nonhematologic Malignancies

Abstract: Overexpression/activation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) in human malignancies has led to its evaluation as a therapeutic target. We report the first-in-human phase I study of BI 853520, a novel, potent, highly selective FAK inhibitor. Our objectives were to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and to evaluate safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), biomarker expression, and preliminary activity. The study comprised a standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation phase followed by an expansion phase in patients with selected advanced, nonhematologic malignancies. Thirty-three patients received BI 853520 in the dose-escalation phase; the MTD was 200 mg once daily (QD). Dose-limiting toxicities included proteinuria and fatigue, both of which were grade 3. Preliminary PK data supported QD dosing. In the expansion cohort, 63 patients received BI 853520 200 mg QD. Drug-related adverse events (AEs) in > 10% of patients included proteinuria (57%), nausea (57%), fatigue (51%), diarrhea (48%), vomiting (40%), decreased appetite (19%), and peripheral edema (16%). Most AEs were grade 1–2; grade 3 proteinuria, reported in 13 patients (21%), was generally reversible upon treatment interruption. Nineteen patients underwent dose reduction due to AEs, and three drug-related serious AEs were reported, none of which were fatal. Preliminary PD analysis indicated target engagement. Of 63 patients, 49 were evaluable; 17 (27%) achieved a best response of stable disease (4 with 150 + days), and 32 (51%) patients had progressive disease. BI 853520 has a manageable and acceptable safety profile, favorable PK, and modest antitumor activity at an MTD of 200 mg QD in patients with selected advanced nonhematologic malignancies. NCT01335269.

An interim report on the investigator-initiated phase 2 study of pembrolizumab immunological response evaluation (INSPIRE).

Abstract: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) demonstrate unprecedented efficacy in multiple malignancies; however, the mechanisms of sensitivity and resistance are poorly understood and predictive biomarkers are scarce. INSPIRE is a phase 2 basket study to evaluate the genomic and immune landscapes of peripheral blood and tumors following pembrolizumab treatment. Patients with incurable, locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors that have progressed on standard therapy, or for whom no standard therapy exists or standard therapy was not deemed appropriate, received 200 mg pembrolizumab intravenously every three weeks. Blood and tissue samples were collected at baseline, during treatment, and at progression. One core biopsy was used for immunohistochemistry and the remaining cores were pooled and divided for genomic and immune analyses. Univariable analysis of clinical, genomic, and immunophenotyping parameters was conducted to evaluate associations with treatment response in this exploratory analysis. Eighty patients were enrolled from March 21, 2016 to June 1, 2017, and 129 tumor and 382 blood samples were collected. Immune biomarkers were significantly different between the blood and tissue. T cell PD-1 was blocked (≥98%) in the blood of all patients by the third week of treatment. In the tumor, 5/11 (45%) and 11/14 (79%) patients had T cell surface PD-1 occupance at weeks six and nine, respectively. The proportion of genome copy number alterations and abundance of intratumoral 4-1BB+ PD-1+ CD8 T cells at baseline (P < 0.05), and fold-expansion of intratumoral CD8 T cells from baseline to cycle 2–3 (P < 0.05) were associated with treatment response. This study provides technical feasibility data for correlative studies. Tissue biopsies provide distinct data from the blood and may predict response to pembrolizumab.

Primary cardiac sarcomas: A multi‐national retrospective review

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Primary cardiac sarcoma (PCS) is a rare but often fatal disease. The current study aimed to analyze the impact of baseline demographics, local and systemic therapies in a contemporary cohort. METHODS: Clinical records of PCS across six institutions in three continents were reviewed. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival. Cox proportional hazard model was used to determine variables impacting progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Sixty-one patients with PCS (1996-2016) were identified. The median age at diagnosis was 46 (range 18-79); 36% (n = 22) presented with metastatic disease. The most common histology was angiosarcoma (n = 24, 39%). A total of 46 patients received surgery (75%) but only 5 (8%) patients achieved R0 resection. Multi-modality treatment to the primary tumor was given to 28 patients (46%; localized disease 23/39 (59%); metastatic disease 5/22 (23%)). The median OS for the entire cohort was 17.5 months (95% CI 9.5-20.6), with seven (11%) patients surviving longer than 36 months. On multi-variate analysis, age <65 (P = 0.01) was the only significant favorable prognostic factor. For first-line palliative chemotherapy, the median PFS was 4.4 months (95% CI 2.9-7.7 months). The best response for first-line chemotherapy was 32% (CR = 1, PR = 9). No significant improvement in OS was identified in patients presenting throughout the 20-year period of this review. CONCLUSION: Younger age at diagnosis was associated with improved outcome although the prognosis of PCS remains poor. Given the lack of improvement in survival, further dedicated research is required.

Feasibility Assessment of Using the Complete Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) Item Library

Abstract: The patient-reported outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) complements capture of symptomatic adverse events (AEs) by clinicians. Previous trials have typically used a limited subset of relevant symptomatic AEs to reduce patient burden. We aimed to determine the feasibility of administering all 80 AEs included in the PRO-CTCAE library by approaching consecutive patients enrolled in a large academic phase I program at three points in time. Here, we report a preplanned analysis after enrolling the first 20 patients. All items were answered on 51 of 56 potential visits (adherence 91%). Three (5%) additional PRO-CTCAE assessments were partially completed, and two (4%) were missed because of conflicting appointments. No patient withdrew consent or chose not to complete the assessments once enrolled on study. Future trials of experimental drugs that incorporate the PRO-CTCAE should consider using this unselected approach to identify adverse events more completely.

Bespoke circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis as a predictive biomarker in solid tumor patients (pts) treated with single-agent pembrolizumab (P).

Abstract: 2542Background: Limited data exist in the clonal dynamics of serial ctDNA as a predictive biomarker in advanced solid tumor pts receiving immune checkpoint blockade. Methods: Pts with mixed solid t...

Survival in early phase immuno-oncology trials: Development and validation of a prognostic index

Abstract: Background: Immuno-oncology (IO) is rapidly evolving in early drug development. We aimed to develop and prospectively validate a prognostic index for patients treated in IO phase I trials to assist with patient selection. Methods: The development cohort included 192 advanced solid tumor patients treated in 13 IO phase I trials, targeting immune checkpoint and/or co-stimulatory molecules. A prognostic scoring system was developed from multivariate survival analysis of 10 clinical factors, and subsequently validated in two independent validation cohorts (n = 152 and n = 80). Results: In the development cohort, median age was 57.5 years (range = 20.4-84.8 years). Median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 13.4 and 73.6 weeks, respectively, 90-day mortality was 16%, and overall response rate was 20%. In multivariate analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status greater than or equal to 1 (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.8 to 5.7; P < .001), number of metastatic sites greater than 2 (HR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.3 to 3.1; P = .003), and albumin less than the lower limit of normal (HR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.2 to 2.7; P = .007) were independent prognostic factors; comprising the Princess Margaret Immuno-oncology Prognostic Index (PM-IPI). Patients with a score of 2-3 compared with patients with a score of 0-1 had shorter OS (HR = 3.4, 95% CI = 1.9 to 6.1; P < .001), progression-free survival (HR = 2.3, 95% CI = 1.7 to 3.2; P < .001), higher 90-day mortality (odds ratio = 8.1, 95% CI = 3.0 to 35.4; P < .001), and lower overall response rate (odds ratio = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.2 to 0.8; P = .019). The PM-IPI retained prognostic ability in both validation cohorts and performed better than previously published phase I prognostic scores for predicting OS in all three cohorts. Conclusions: The PM-IPI is a validated prognostic score for patients treated in phase IIO trials and may aid in improving patient selection.

Abstract C077: Updated results of phase 1 study of ripretinib (DCC-2618), a broad-spectrum KIT and PDGFRA inhibitor, in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) by line of therapy (NCT02571036)

Abstract: Objective: Ripretinib (DCC-2618) is a kinase switch control inhibitor designed to broadly inhibit KIT and PDGFRA mutations. Based on clinical activity observed in heavily pretreated patients (pts) with GIST in a Phase 1 study (NCT02571036), ripretinib is under evaluation in two Phase 3 studies: INVICTUS (NCT03353753) in ≥4th-line pts and INTRIGUE (NCT03673501) in 2nd-line pts, each at the recommended dose of 150 mg once daily (QD). This abstract reports updated results from the escalation and expansion phases of the Phase 1 study for pts treated with ≥100 mg daily dose. Methods: The Phase 1 study includes a dose-escalation phase that tested oral ripretinib QD or twice daily (BID) in 28-day cycles, followed by an expansion phase with the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of 150 mg QD in 6 cohorts, including cohorts for pts with GIST based on prior regimens (2nd/ 3rd, 4th, and >4th-line). Local Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) response assessments were performed every 2 cycles and pts who progressed per RECIST in the expansion cohorts were allowed to dose escalate to 150 mg BID. Results: At a cut-off date of March 01, 2019, 179 pts with GIST in the escalation and expansion phases (median follow-up of 10.4 months; range, 0.1–32.3) were enrolled at dose levels of ≥100 mg daily with KIT-driven (169 pts), PDGFRA-driven (9 pts), or wild-type-driven GIST (1 pt). Of 178 pts with GIST treated at the ≥100 mg daily dose (1 pt was not included in the intent-to-treat population as the pt only participated in the food effect portion of the study), there were 37 2nd-line pts, 31 3rd-line pts, 60 4th-line pts, and 50 >4th-line pts. The objective response rate (ORR) by best response was 30% in 2nd-line pts (n=11; includes 3 unconfirmed responses), 23% in 3rd-line pts (n=7; includes 3 unconfirmed responses), and 11% in ≥4th-line pts (n=12; includes 4 unconfirmed responses); responses ≥4th-line include 15% in 4th-line pts (n=9; includes 4 unconfirmed responses) and 6% in >4th-line pts (n=3; includes no unconfirmed responses). In 2nd-line pts, the disease control rate (DCR) was 31% (n=9) at 52 weeks. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 42 weeks in 2nd-line pts, 40 weeks in 3rd-line pts, and 24 weeks in ≥4th-line pts (includes 30 weeks in 4th-line pts and 16 weeks in >4th-line pts). In 2nd-line pts, the median duration of response was 80 weeks and the median duration of treatment was 44 weeks. For any line, 13% of pts (n=24) experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) leading to study treatment discontinuation, 17% of pts (n=31) experienced TEAEs leading to dose reduction and 49% (n=88) had TEAEs leading to study drug interruption. Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs in >5% of pts were lipase increased (18%; n=33), anemia (11%; n=20), hypertension (7%; n=13), and abdominal pain (6%; n=11). Conclusion: In this Phase 1 study, ripretinib demonstrated encouraging clinical benefit (as measured by mPFS, ORR [best response] and DCR) and was generally well-tolerated in pts with GIST treated in the 2nd-line or later. Preliminary data from this Phase 1 study further supports testing in the ongoing Phase 3 study in 2nd-line GIST. Citation Format: Ping Chi, Filip Janku, Michael Heinrich, Kristen Ganjoo, Hans Gelderblom, Michael Gordon, Robin Jones, Albiruni Razak, Jonathan Trent, Margaret von Mehren, Simin Hu, Ying Su, Rodrigo Ruiz-Soto, Suzanne George. Updated results of phase 1 study of ripretinib (DCC-2618), a broad-spectrum KIT and PDGFRA inhibitor, in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) by line of therapy (NCT02571036) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2019 Oct 26-30; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2019;18(12 Suppl):Abstract nr C077. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.TARG-19-C077

A phase II study of ENMD-2076 in advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS).

Abstract: ENMD-2076, an aurora-A kinase inhibitor with anti-angiogenic properties, has shown activity in solid and hematologic malignancies. We investigated oral ENMD-2076 in an open-label, single-arm phase II study using 275 mg daily on a 28-day cycle in patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) receiving ≤1 line of prior therapy. Primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) with ≤15% indicating no interest, and ≥40% indicating further interest in ENMD-2076. Secondary/exploratory endpoints included clinical benefit (CBR ≥6-months) and objective response (ORR) rates, PFS, OS, safety, and whole-exome sequencing (WES) for potentially associated biomarkers. Overall, 23/25 (92%) patients receiving ENMD-2076 were efficacy evaluable with median follow-up of 14 months (range 2.2–39.5). Common subtypes were leiomyosarcoma (n = 10), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (n = 3), angiosarcoma (n = 3), and alveolar soft-part sarcoma (n = 3). The 6-month PFS was 20.8% (95% CI:3.2–38.4) with a CBR of 17% (95% CI:1.55–33.23) and ORR of 9% (95% CI:3.08–20.46). Median PFS was 2.5 months (95% CI:2.20–4.47) and OS was 14.1 months (95% CI:6.07–20.07). The most common high-grade treatment-related adverse event was hypertension (60%). WES identified PTPRB mutations in 3/4 patients (p = 0.018) benefiting from ENMD-2076. Although this study failed to meet its primary endpoint, occasional responses and prolonged stable disease was noted. ENMD-2076 evaluation in PTPRB mutated tumors and/or angiosarcoma is warranted.

Hyperprogressive disease in advanced triple-negative breast cancer (aTNBC) treated with immunotherapy (IO).

Abstract: 1086Background: Hyperprogression of disease (HPD), a rapid acceleration of tumor growth rate (TGR) has been reported with IO in other tumor types. Here, we explore HPD in aTNBC. Methods: A retrospe...

Abstract CT058: Ripretinib (DCC-2618) pharmacokinetics (PK) in a Phase I study in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) and other advanced malignancies: A retrospective evaluation of the PK effects of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs)

Abstract: Objectives: Ripretinib is a novel, oral kinase switch control inhibitor of KIT and PDGFRα. Encouraging clinical benefit from the phase 1 dose escalation and expansion study as measured by ORR, DCR and PFS in 2nd, 3rd, and >4th line GIST patients with a favorable tolerability profile at doses >100 mg/day has been previously reported (ESMO 2018, abstract #1603O). It has been reported that more than 40% of GIST patients use acid-reducing agents. PPIs are the most potent acid-reducing agents that may impair the absorption of kinase inhibitors 1,2. This retrospective analysis aims to explore whether ripretinib can be used regardless of concomitant PPI use. Methods: The analysis assessed the impact of PPIs on the plasma concentration of ripretinib using PK data from the expansion cohort at the recommended Phase 2 dose of 150 mg QD. Plasma concentrations of ripretinib and its active metabolite DP-5439 obtained from patients who used or did not use PPIs were compared on Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1, n=106) and Day 15 (C1D15, n=102). Patients using PPIs were defined as those who continuously took PPIs for at least 4 days prior to C1D1 or C1D15. Patients who did not use PPIs were defined as those who did not take PPIs or any other acid-reducing agents during the study. Results: PK profiles were consistent between patients using and not using PPIs (Table 1), indicating a low likelihood of a clinically significant drug interaction between PPIs and ripretinib. Conclusions: This retrospective PK analysis provides supporting evidence that restriction of co-administration of PPIs with ripretinib may not be necessary. A dedicated drug interaction study is planned to provide a definitive assessment. References: 1. Smelick et al, Mol. Pharmaceutics 2013, 10, 4055−4062 2. Budha et al, Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012, 92(2):203-13 Citation Format: Filip Janku, Michael Heinrich, Ping Chi, Albiruni Abdul Razak, Margaret von Mehren, Michael Gordon, Kristen Ganjoo, Jonathan Trent, Robin L. Jones, Hans Gelderblom, Kelli Running, Jing Wang, Rodrigo Ruiz-Soto, Suzanne George. Ripretinib (DCC-2618) pharmacokinetics (PK) in a Phase I study in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) and other advanced malignancies: A retrospective evaluation of the PK effects of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT058.

Referrals to a Phase I Clinic and Trial Enrollment in the Molecular Screening Era

Abstract: BACKGROUND Enrichment of patients based on molecular biomarkers is increasingly used in early phase clinical trials. Molecular profiling of patients with advanced cancers can identify specific genomic alterations to inform decisions about investigational treatment(s). Our aim was to evaluate the outcomes of new patient referrals to a large academic solid tumor phase I clinical trial program after the implementation of molecular profiling. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective chart review of all new referrals to the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (PM) phase I clinic from May 2012 to December 2014. Molecular profiling using either MALDI-TOF hotspot mutation genotyping or targeted panel DNA sequencing was performed for patients at PM or community hospitals through the institutional IMPACT/COMPACT trials. RESULTS A total of 971 new patient referrals were included for this analysis. Twenty-seven percent of referrals assessed in clinic were subsequently enrolled in phase I trials. Of all new referrals, 41% had prior molecular profiling, of whom 11% (n = 42) were enrolled in genotype-matched trials. Patients with prior molecular profiling were younger, more heavily pretreated, and had more favorable Princess Margaret Hospital Index (PMHI) scores. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1 (p = .002), internal referrals within PM (p = .002), and PMHI (p ≤ .001) were independently associated with successful trial enrollment in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION Although nearly half of new patients referred to a phase I clinic had prior molecular profiling, the proportion subsequently enrolled into clinical trials was low. Prior molecular profiling was not an independent predictor of clinical trial enrollment. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The landscape of oncology drug development is evolving alongside technological advancements. Recently, large academic medical centers have implemented clinical sequencing protocols to identify patients with actionable genomic alterations to enroll in therapeutic clinical trials. This study evaluates patient referral and enrollment patterns in a large academic phase I clinical trials program following the implementation of a molecular profiling program. Performance status and referral from a physician within the institution were associated with successful trial enrollment, whereas prior molecular profiling was not an independent predictor.