scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Craig S. Wilding published in 2015"


Journal ArticleDOI
Daniel E. Neafsey1, Robert M. Waterhouse, Mohammad Reza Abai2, Sergey Aganezov3, Max A. Alekseyev3, James E. Allen4, James Amon, Bruno Arcà5, Peter Arensburger6, Gleb N. Artemov7, Lauren A. Assour8, Hamidreza Basseri2, Aaron M. Berlin1, Bruce W. Birren1, Stéphanie Blandin9, Stéphanie Blandin10, Andrew I. Brockman11, Thomas R. Burkot12, Austin Burt11, Clara S. Chan13, Cedric Chauve14, Joanna C. Chiu15, Mikkel B. Christensen4, Carlo Costantini16, Victoria L.M. Davidson17, Elena Deligianni18, Tania Dottorini11, Vicky Dritsou19, Stacey Gabriel1, Wamdaogo M. Guelbeogo, Andrew Brantley Hall20, Mira V. Han21, Thaung Hlaing, Daniel S.T. Hughes4, Daniel S.T. Hughes22, Adam M. Jenkins23, Xiaofang Jiang20, Irwin Jungreis13, Evdoxia G. Kakani24, Evdoxia G. Kakani19, Maryam Kamali20, Petri Kemppainen25, Ryan C. Kennedy26, Ioannis K. Kirmitzoglou11, Ioannis K. Kirmitzoglou27, Lizette L. Koekemoer28, Njoroge Laban, Nicholas Langridge4, Mara K. N. Lawniczak11, Manolis Lirakis29, Neil F. Lobo8, Ernesto Lowy4, Robert M. MacCallum11, Chunhong Mao20, Gareth Maslen4, Charles Mbogo30, Jenny McCarthy6, Kristin Michel17, Sara N. Mitchell24, Wendy Moore31, Katherine A. Murphy15, Anastasia N. Naumenko20, Tony Nolan11, Eva Maria Novoa13, Samantha M. O’Loughlin11, Chioma Oringanje31, Mohammad Ali Oshaghi2, Nazzy Pakpour15, Philippos Aris Papathanos19, Philippos Aris Papathanos11, Ashley Peery20, Michael Povelones32, Anil Prakash33, David P. Price34, Ashok Rajaraman14, Lisa J. Reimer35, David C. Rinker36, Antonis Rokas37, Tanya L. Russell12, N’Fale Sagnon, Maria V. Sharakhova20, Terrance Shea1, Felipe A. Simão38, Felipe A. Simão39, Frédéric Simard16, Michel A. Slotman40, Pradya Somboon41, V. N. Stegniy7, Claudio J. Struchiner42, Claudio J. Struchiner43, Gregg W.C. Thomas44, Marta Tojo45, Pantelis Topalis18, Jose M. C. Tubio46, Maria F. Unger8, John Vontas29, Catherine Walton25, Craig S. Wilding47, Judith H. Willis48, Yi-Chieh Wu13, Yi-Chieh Wu49, Guiyun Yan50, Evgeny M. Zdobnov38, Evgeny M. Zdobnov39, Xiaofan Zhou37, Flaminia Catteruccia24, Flaminia Catteruccia19, George K. Christophides11, Frank H. Collins8, Robert S. Cornman48, Andrea Crisanti11, Andrea Crisanti19, Martin J. Donnelly46, Martin J. Donnelly35, Scott J. Emrich8, Michael C. Fontaine51, Michael C. Fontaine8, William M. Gelbart24, Matthew W. Hahn44, Immo A. Hansen34, Paul I. Howell52, Fotis C. Kafatos11, Manolis Kellis13, Daniel Lawson4, Christos Louis18, Shirley Luckhart15, Marc A. T. Muskavitch53, Marc A. T. Muskavitch23, José M. C. Ribeiro, Michael A. Riehle31, Igor V. Sharakhov20, Zhijian Tu20, Laurence J. Zwiebel37, Nora J. Besansky8 
Broad Institute1, Tehran University of Medical Sciences2, George Washington University3, European Bioinformatics Institute4, Sapienza University of Rome5, Temple University6, Tomsk State University7, University of Notre Dame8, French Institute of Health and Medical Research9, Centre national de la recherche scientifique10, Imperial College London11, James Cook University12, Massachusetts Institute of Technology13, Simon Fraser University14, University of California, Davis15, Institut de recherche pour le développement16, Kansas State University17, Foundation for Research & Technology – Hellas18, University of Perugia19, Virginia Tech20, University of Nevada, Las Vegas21, Baylor College of Medicine22, Boston College23, Harvard University24, University of Manchester25, University of California, San Francisco26, University of Cyprus27, National Health Laboratory Service28, University of Crete29, Kenya Medical Research Institute30, University of Arizona31, University of Pennsylvania32, Indian Council of Medical Research33, New Mexico State University34, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine35, Vanderbilt University Medical Center36, Vanderbilt University37, University of Geneva38, Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics39, Texas A&M University40, Chiang Mai University41, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation42, Rio de Janeiro State University43, Indiana University44, University of Santiago de Compostela45, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute46, Liverpool John Moores University47, University of Georgia48, Harvey Mudd College49, University of California, Irvine50, University of Groningen51, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention52, Biogen Idec53
02 Jan 2015-Science
TL;DR: The authors investigated the genomic basis of vectorial capacity and explore new avenues for vector control, sequenced the genomes of 16 anopheline mosquito species from diverse locations spanning ~100 million years of evolution Comparative analyses show faster rates of gene gain and loss, elevated gene shuffling on the X chromosome, and more intron losses, relative to Drosophila.
Abstract: Variation in vectorial capacity for human malaria among Anopheles mosquito species is determined by many factors, including behavior, immunity, and life history To investigate the genomic basis of vectorial capacity and explore new avenues for vector control, we sequenced the genomes of 16 anopheline mosquito species from diverse locations spanning ~100 million years of evolution Comparative analyses show faster rates of gene gain and loss, elevated gene shuffling on the X chromosome, and more intron losses, relative to Drosophila Some determinants of vectorial capacity, such as chemosensory genes, do not show elevated turnover but instead diversify through protein-sequence changes This dynamism of anopheline genes and genomes may contribute to their flexible capacity to take advantage of new ecological niches, including adapting to humans as primary hosts

476 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An unexpected finding is apparently ubiquitous amplification of 119S alleles as part of a large copy number variant (CNV) far exceeding the size of the Ace‐1 gene, whereas 119G alleles were unduplicated.
Abstract: Functionally constrained genes are ideal insecticide targets because disruption is often fatal, and resistance mutations are typically costly. Synaptic acetylcholinesterase (AChE) is an essential neurotransmission enzyme targeted by insecticides used increasingly in malaria control. In Anopheles and Culex mosquitoes, a glycine–serine substitution at codon 119 of the Ace-1 gene confers both resistance and fitness costs, especially for 119S/S homozygotes. G119S in Anopheles gambiae from Accra (Ghana) is strongly associated with resistance, and, despite expectations of cost, resistant 119S alleles are increasing significantly in frequency. Sequencing of Accra females detected only a single Ace-1 119S haplotype, whereas 119G diversity was high overall but very low at non-synonymous sites, evidence of strong purifying selection driven by functional constraint. Flanking microsatellites showed reduced diversity, elevated linkage disequilibrium and high differentiation of 119S, relative to 119G homozygotes across up to two megabases of the genome. Yet these signals of selection were inconsistent and sometimes weak tens of kilobases from Ace-1. This unexpected finding is attributable to apparently ubiquitous amplification of 119S alleles as part of a large copy number variant (CNV) far exceeding the size of the Ace-1 gene, whereas 119G alleles were unduplicated. Ace-1 CNV was detectable in archived samples collected when the 119S allele was rare in Ghana. Multicopy amplification of resistant alleles has not been observed previously and is likely to underpin the recent increase in 119S frequency. The large CNV compromised localization of the strong selective sweep around Ace-1, emphasizing the need to integrate CNV analysis into genome scans for selection.

64 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The demonstration of a role for an up-regulated gene in metabolic resistance to insecticides should not be limited to simply whether it can metabolise insecticide; such a strict criterion would argue against the involvement of GSTE4 despite the weight of evidence to the contrary.
Abstract: Insecticide resistance is a major impediment to the control of vectors and pests of public health importance and is a strongly selected trait capable of rapid spread, sometimes even between closely related species. Elucidating the mechanisms generating insecticide resistance in mosquito vectors of disease, and understanding the spread of resistance within and between populations and species are vital for the development of robust resistance management strategies. Here, we studied the mechanisms of resistance in two sympatric members of the Anopheles gambiae species complex—the major vector of malaria in sub-Saharan Africa—to understand how resistance has developed and spread in eastern Uganda, a region with some of the highest levels of malaria. In eastern Uganda, where the mosquitoes Anopheles arabiensis and An. gambiae can be found sympatrically, low levels of hybrids (0.4 %) occur, offering a route for introgression of adaptively important variants between species. In independent microarray studies of insecticide resistance, Gste4, an insect-specific glutathione S-transferase, was among the most significantly up-regulated genes in both species. To test the hypothesis of interspecific introgression, we sequenced 2.3 kbp encompassing Gste4. Whilst this detailed sequencing ruled out introgression, we detected strong positive selection acting on Gste4. However, these sequences, followed by haplotype-specific qPCR, showed that the apparent up-regulation in An. arabiensis is a result of allelic variation across the microarray probe binding sites which artefactually elevates the gene expression signal. Thus, face-value acceptance of microarray data can be misleading and it is advisable to conduct a more detailed investigation of the causes and nature of such signal. The identification of positive selection acting on this locus led us to functionally express and characterise allelic variants of GSTE4. Although the in vitro data do not support a direct role for GSTE4 in metabolism, they do support a role for this enzyme in insecticide sequestration. Thus, the demonstration of a role for an up-regulated gene in metabolic resistance to insecticides should not be limited to simply whether it can metabolise insecticide; such a strict criterion would argue against the involvement of GSTE4 despite the weight of evidence to the contrary.

48 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An AFLP genome scan on samples collected from both sympatric and allopatric populations from Europe and the USA supports the molestus and pipiens status as distinct evolutionary entities with low genomic divergence.
Abstract: Divergent selection can be a major driver of ecological speciation. In insects of medical importance, understanding the speciation process is both of academic interest and public health importance. In the West Nile virus vector Culex pipiens, intraspecific pipiens and molestus forms vary in ecological and physiological traits. Populations of each form appear to share recent common ancestry but patterns of genetic differentiation across the genome remain unknown. Here, we undertook an AFLP genome scan on samples collected from both sympatric and allopatric populations from Europe and the USA to quantify the extent of genomic differentiation between the two forms. The forms were clearly differentiated but each exhibited major population sub-structuring between continents. Divergence between pipiens and molestus forms from USA was higher than in both inter- and intra-continental comparisons with European samples. The proportion of outlier loci between pipiens and molestus (≈3 %) was low but consistent in both continents, and similar to those observed between sibling species of other mosquito species which exhibit contemporary gene flow. Only two of the outlier loci were shared between inter-form comparisons made within Europe and USA. This study supports the molestus and pipiens status as distinct evolutionary entities with low genomic divergence. The low number of shared divergent loci between continents suggests a relatively limited number of genomic regions determining key typological traits likely to be driving incipient speciation and/or adaptation of molestus to anthropogenic habitats.

13 citations